• 2 minutes Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 4 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 7 minutes Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 50 mins Joe Biden the "Archie Bunker" of the left selects Kamala Harris for VP . . . . . . Does she help the campaign ?
  • 24 hours China wields coronavirus to nationalize American-owned carmaker
  • 2 hours Trump Hands Putin Major Geopolitical Victory
  • 1 day Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
  • 2 hours Those Nasty White People and Camping Racism
  • 17 hours COVID&life and Vicious Circle: "Working From Home Is Not Panacea For Virus"
  • 7 hours Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
  • 2 days US will pay for companies to bring supply chains home from China: Kudlow - COVID-19 has highlighted the problem of relying too heavily on one country for production
  • 15 mins The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
  • 16 hours Oil Tanker Runs Aground in Mauritius - Oil Spill
  • 2 days Trump is turning USA into a 3rd world dictatorship
  • 4 days Trumpist lies about coronavirus too bad for Facebook - BANNED!
  • 3 days Liquid Air Battery
  • 3 days What the heroin industry can teach us about solar power (BBC)

Burning Trees For Heating Won’t Help With Climate Change: UK Think Tank

A suggestion by the UK Committee on Climate Change to burn more wood and plant replacement trees as a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels has drawn criticism from think tank Chatham House, which says this is hardly the best approach to reducing emissions.

"Expanding forest cover is undoubtedly a good thing, if you're leaving them standing," energy expert Duncan Brack told the Daily Telegraph. However, Brack, who served as special adviser to the Department of Energy and Climate Change, suggested that burning wood for heating was not the most sustainable way forward. Calling wood burning a carbon neutral process is “highly dubious,” Brack added.

These claims, according to the Telegraph’s environment editor, Emma Gatten, rest on the assumption that the carbon footprint of chopping down trees and burning them is offset by planting new trees to replace them. This assumption excludes the fact that older trees absorb more carbon and that it takes time to replace a forest.

"You can leave trees standing and they will continue to absorb carbon for decades," Brack says. "But the biomass industry implicitly assumes that forests at some point stop reach a saturation point for carbon intake and can be harvested and simply replaced." 

The benefit of planting trees to mitigate the effects of climate change has been put to the test on a wider scale as well. A study released last year found that reforestation could work, but it had to be done at a massive scale.

We need to plant 25 percent more trees than there are on Earth right now, or more than half a trillion in total, the study found. This would reduce the amount of carbon in the atmosphere by a quarter, erasing 20 years of emissions. Yet it would not solve the climate problem on its own, without a sustained effort to cut emissions, commentators on the study said.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Carlos Everett on January 24 2020 said:
    I would suggest you go back and read the study that was and still is supported by ABC News , a liberal paper, wherein the study published and listed in a July 5th, ABC News episode, that indicated, an expansion of reforestation of trees, would in the short term reduce the climate problem by 60% and more if the reforestation continued.

    This , so far, is the most economical way to solve climate change in the short term. No one is suggesting that we discontinue, wind and solar or other renewables, as it sounds like they will be cheaper on a per unit basis, which is a win/win for the consumer. However, lets fix the problem in the cheapest manner, then lets let fossil fuels and renewables battle it out to find the cheapest energy source.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News