• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 16 mins GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 7 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 1 day e-truck insanity
  • 7 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 7 days China deletes leaked stats showing plunging birth rate for 2023
  • 8 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
  • 5 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
China’s Secret Weapon in the Global Copper War

China’s Secret Weapon in the Global Copper War

China's strategic use of copper…

BP Gives Up On Drilling Project In The Australian Bight

BP has quit a US$600-million drilling operation in the Great Australian Bight. According to the company’s Australian managing director for exploration and production, Claire Fitzpatrick, the project was not in line with BP’s “strategic goals.”

Another reason for the withdrawal could be the strong public opposition to drilling for oil in the pristine Bight, and several regulatory delays, including two rejections from Australia’s National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority.

The Great Australian Bight, a marine reserve, had, according to BP, the potential to turn into a new Gulf of Mexico, so the company splashed millions on exploration and commissioning a platform while applying for a drilling permit with Nopsema. The regulator rejected BP’s plans twice, and repeatedly sought more information about its environmental protection mechanisms. The latest request for information came at the end of September.

In that request, Nopsema asked BP to amend its oil spill modeling and response plans, after they were found to not be up to par as per industry best standards by an Australian National University professor. According to the Guardian, Nopsema’s stringency was reinforced by a growing worry among environmental regulators about faulty bolts used in offshore platforms that could cause a major spill if the problem is not addressed quickly.

BP said in its official statement on the project suspension that its decision had nothing to do with Nopsema’s delays and rejections, and that it does not change the company’s view that the Bight is very rich in crude oil. However, the statement read, “It is an outcome of our strategy and the relative competitiveness of this project in our portfolio.”

Related: Oil Surges To One-Year High As Putin Backs OPEC Deal

The withdrawal from the Bight may have serious consequences for the economy of South Australia. “They made a promise to the Australian Government that they would spend nearly $1.4 billion on exploration in the Great Australian Bight when they tendered for these tenements and now, they withdraw,” Australian Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis said, adding that BP’s decision to withdraw was “bitterly disappointing”

Meanwhile, an Australian environmental group, is discouraging all other interested oil majors to follow BP’s lead and abandon all hope for the area, after estimating that a potential spill in the Bight would have severe economic consequences. According to the Wilderness Society, an oil spill in the Bight would destroy the local fishing industry, worth US$422 annually, along with regional tourism.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

ADVERTISEMENT

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News