• 2 minutes California to ban gasoline for lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf blowers, off road equipment, etc.
  • 6 minutes China and India are both needing more coal and prices are now extremely high. They need maximum fossil fuel.
  • 11 minutes Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 2 hours Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 3 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 6 hours "Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The "Crusade" Against Climate Change" - Zero Hedge re: Bank of America REPORT
  • 6 hours Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 58 mins Two Good and Plausible Ideas about Saving Water and Redirecting it to Where it is Needed.
  • 5 hours Did China cherry-pick the factors that affected the economic slow-down?
  • 5 days "A Very Predictable Global Energy Crisis" by Irina Slav --- MUST READ
  • 3 days U.S. : Employers Can Buy Retirement Security for $2.64 an Hour
  • 3 days Nord Stream - US/German consultations
  • 5 days An Indian Opinion on What is Going on in China
  • 409 days Class Act: Bet You've Never Seen A President Do This.
  • 3 days Australia sues Neoen for lack of power from its Tesla battery
  • 2 days Forecasts for Natural Gas
  • 5 days Storage of gas cylinders

Aramco Pulls Out Of Joint Venture Talks With Petronas

Saudi Aramco has pulled out of a planned joint venture with Malaysia’s state-owned oil company Petronas, concerning the construction and operation of a major refining and petrochemical complex in southern Malaysia, according to sources close to the deal.

The multi-billion-dollar Refinery and Petrochemical Integrated Development was planned to have a daily throughput rate of 300,000 barrels of crude, producing 7.7 million tons of petrochemicals annually. The complex would have also included a regasification terminal for LNG.

No reasons were given for the shelving, either by Aramco or by Petronas, with both companies telling the WSJ that they did not comment on speculation.

The Malaysian company last year sought to borrow US$7.2 billion to advance the project, estimated to be worth some US$20.1 billion. According to the Wall Street Journal, Aramco has concluded after a feasibility study that the project will not yield the desirable level of returns.

Both Aramco and Petronas have been hit by the oil price crash and it makes sense for the world’s largest oil company, by output, to be more cautious with future projects especially in light of its upcoming IPO in 2018. Yesterday, media reported that Aramco is seeking advisers on the listing, sending out requests for proposals to large and small investment banks. Aramco expects the IPO to bring in some US$100 billion for 5 percent of the company.

Petronas, for its part, has been looking for new revenue streams after having to axe 1,000 jobs and squeezing capex by US$11.3 billion (50 billion ringgit) over the period from 2016 to 2020.

The Malaysian company last month announced it had found a new location for its US$27-billion LNG project in Canada, the Pacific NorthWest LNG, in response to environmental opposition to its first choice of location. The final investment decision on this project should be made by the end of the first quarter.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Ali on January 25 2017 said:
    Why would ARAMCO ship oil and natural gas 7,000 miles to Malaysia for refining? Saudi Arabia and Qatar need refineries, jobs, and value added exports.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News