• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 7 days Solving The Space Problem For America’s Solar Industry
  • 3 hours Investment in renewables tanking
  • 7 days Russian Officials Voice Concerns About Chinese-Funded Rail Line
  • 17 hours If hydrogen is the answer, you're asking the wrong question
  • 1 day "Mexico Plans to Become an Export Hub With US-Drilled Natural Gas" - Bloomberg - (See image)
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy

Australian Gas Giant Wants To Import Carbon Dioxide From Asia

Santos, an Australian energy major with a focus on gas, wants to import carbon dioxide from Asia and store it in local reservoirs.

The idea may have sounded somewhat eccentric a few years ago but it seems that carbon capture and storage is gaining traction thanks to government support for such projects.

The support comes despite the scarcity of such projects in operation, with Bloomberg reporting there were only 30 carbon capture and storage projects across the world last year.

Santos, however, has ambitious plans: it wants to collect carbon dioxide from Asia and ship it to a storage facility in the Cooper Basin in South Australia. At the same, Santos plans to store some 1.7 million tons of its own carbon dioxide emitted during gas production activities in the basin.

Hard to abate sectors such as fertilizer, such as cement, such as steel manufacturing, all require solutions beyond what’s being currently offered,” said Santos energy solutions president Brett Woods as quoted by Bloomberg.

He went on to add that the Moomba facility in the Cooper Basin has the capacity to store 20 million tons of carbon dioxide annually for 50 years.

One of the arguments of carbon capture critics is that the technology is too expensive to be worth the investment. Santos, however, says that the first stage of the Moomba capture facility will cost less than $150 million (A$220 million) and the cost of storing CO2 there would be as little as $16 per ton.

Despite the track record of limited success, carbon capture may be beginning to take off. Governments are providing subsidies and companies are being pressured into reducing their emissions footprints by any means available.


The schemes face criticism from environmental advocates who say that carbon removal credits do not address the problem of emissions reduction and could lead to more greenwashing from the big polluters. Some have slammed the technology as an excuse for the oil industry to continue existing.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News