• 5 minutes Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 9 minutes Sell out now or hold on?
  • 16 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 2 hours Oil prices going down
  • 9 hours Oil and Trade War
  • 8 hours When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 53 mins Sabotage at Tesla
  • 11 hours Russia and Saudi Arabia to have a chat on oil during FIFA World Cup - report
  • 11 hours Sell out now or hold on?
  • 9 hours venezuala oil crisis
  • 7 hours Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 12 hours Malaysia's Petronas vs. Sarawak Court Case - Will It End Up In London Courts?
  • 8 hours Germany Orders Daimler to Recall 774,000 Diesel Cars in Europe
  • 6 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 21 hours Two Koreas Agree To March Together At Asian Games
  • 13 hours Correlation Between Oil Sweet Spots and Real Estate Hot Spots
  • 5 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 7 hours After Three Decade Macedonia End Dispute With Greece, new name: the Republic of Northern Macedonia
  • 19 hours Trump Renews Attack On OPEC Ahead Of Group's Production Meeting
Why There Won’t Be An OPEC For Battery Metals

Why There Won’t Be An OPEC For Battery Metals

A very dynamic market, quickly…

EV Makers Receive Little Support From Trump

EV Makers Receive Little Support From Trump

Electric vehicle makers find themselves…

America's Denial Damages Climate Change Efforts

Given safe haven from the impact of climate change by their privilege and wealth, the decision-making elite of the US has no intention of making the sacrifices that could lessen the impact of that change on the rest of the world. That is just as dangerous a form of denialism as refusing to admit climate change is happening at all.

That the decision makers are in denial is clear from the stated opinions of many energy experts, as well as future trend predictions both by energy companies and by the US intelligence community.  They still see climate change as a largely political issue, rather than as a disaster-in-process, and are reacting as if to a political movement instead of realizing that action must be radical and prompt simply to reduce the scale of that disaster, for there is no stopping it now.

Recently my friends at Oilprice.com published an interview with energy security expert Michael Levi, the David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for Energy and the Environment and Director of the Program on Energy Security and Climate Change at the Council on Foreign Relations. He had some things to say on the current, accelerating, US energy production boom, on the Keystone pipeline and on climate change.

Levi sees the main problem about the glut of US natural gas production as being that producers haven’t done enough to stimulate demand for their gas – that the low price is more of a problem than the amount of gas, in other words. He is happy about the current shale oil boom and while warning about over-hyping the strategic consequences of that boom says that “in this case, reality is pretty radical itself”. He worries that opposition to the Keystone pipeline will lead to “ blocking pipelines all over the place, then that becomes a larger economic problem”, and describes the pipeline as something that is “non-essential to US energy security; it is also not disastrous to climate change”.

To read full article click here.



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News