• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 39 mins Maybe 8 to 10 "good" years left in oil industry * UAE model for Economic Deversification * Others spent oil billions on funding terrorism, wars, suppressing dissidents * Too late now
  • 6 hours Russia Accuses U.S. Of Stoking Tensions With Missile Test
  • 6 hours OPEC will consider all options. What options do they have ?
  • 5 hours CLIMATE PANIC! ELEVENTY!!! "250,000 people die a year due to the climate crisis"
  • 58 mins Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
  • 2 hours TRUMP'S FORMER 'CHRISTIAN LIAISON' SAYS DEEPWATER HORIZON DISASTER WAS GOD'S PUNISHMENT FOR OBAMA ISRAEL DIVISION
  • 5 hours What to tell my students
  • 10 hours With Global Warming Greenland is Prime Real Estate
  • 29 mins NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 20 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 17 hours In The Bright Of New Administration Rules: Immigrants as Economic Contributors
  • 13 hours Get First Access To The Oilprice App!
  • 3 hours Flaring is at Record Highs in Texas
Alt Text

Venezuela: A Real Threat To Guyana's Oil Boom

Venezuela’s incursion in Guyanese waters…

Alt Text

Russia Begins To Fear Maduro May Lose

Russia, one of Venezuelan President…

Editorial Dept

Editorial Dept

More Info

Premium Content

Ecuador Continues Its Defense in Arbitration Commenced By Chevron

On March 11, 2010, the Honorable Leonard Sand, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, denied the Republic of Ecuador’s Petition to Stay the pending arbitration commenced by Chevron Corp. under the U.S.-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty.

Chevron commenced the arbitration on September 23, 2009, claiming that Chevron is not being afforded adequate due process in the Ecuadorian courts with respect to an environmental claim currently being litigated between private parties, namely, a group of indigenous citizens of Ecuador and Chevron. Importantly, the plaintiffs in that case first filed their claims in the U.S. federal court in New York in 1993.

From 1993 to 2002, Chevron defended that case by arguing that the claims should be adjudicated in Ecuador rather than in the United States. To obtain dismissal of the environmental case in New York, Chevron agreed to consent to jurisdiction in Ecuador, and to satisfy any final judgment rendered there. Chevron agreed to contest the judgment only in an enforcement hearing, after judgment, under a specified New York law.

By way of Ecuador’s petition to stay the arbitration, the Republic sought to enforce Chevron’s promises to the New York court, promises the court relied upon in dismissing the environmental action in favor of an Ecuadorian forum. Today, while calling some of Chevron’s requested relief “imaginative, “ the court nevertheless declined to stay the arbitration. In so doing, the court emphasized that it was not addressing the merits of Chevron’s arbitration claims, finding only that, in its view, under New York state law, the issues raised by Chevron are matters to be addressed in arbitration.

Once the decision was rendered, the Republic of Ecuador’s Attorney General, Diego García Carrión, stated: “The Republic guarantees all litigants before its courts, including Chevron, procedural due process safeguards, including in litigations against the Government. In recent years, Chevron and its affiliates have in fact obtained money judgments against the Government in Ecuadorian courts. The Republic has not interfered and will not interfere in the pending environmental litigation still pending in Ecuador; it instead will continue to ensure that the judicial processes continue in a fair and impartial manner consistent with the procedural rights afforded all parties.”

The Republic is considering its rights of appeal. The decision of the U.S. District Court does not affect, whatsoever, the arguments to be raised by Ecuador in the Arbitral proceeding, and the ruling does not take any particular position on the issues been claimed by Chevron. The Republic is confident that Chevron’s allegations of misconduct will be rejected in whatever forum they are heard.




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play