• 3 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 8 minutes Why Is America (Texas) Burning Millions of Dollars Per Day Of Natural Gas?
  • 11 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 15 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 7 hours The Pope: "Climate change ... doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain."
  • 2 days Hormuz and surrounding waters: Energy Threats to the World: Oil, LNG, shipping markets digest new risks after Strait of Hormuz attack
  • 4 hours Greenpeace claims one oil rig is "pushing the world closer to a climate catastrophe"
  • 12 hours The Latest: Iranian FM Says US Cannot Expect To ‘Stay Safe’
  • 4 hours Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 3 mins Hydrogen FTW... Some Day
  • 1 day Russia removes special military forces from Venezuela . . . . Maduro gone by September ? . . . Oil starts to flow ? Think so . .
  • 11 hours Emmissions up, renewables nowhere
  • 2 days Never Knew Gasoline Prices were this important!
  • 1 day Plants are Dying
  • 2 days The Magic and Wonders of US Shale Supply: Keeping energy price shock minimised: US oil supply keeping lid on prices despite global risks: IEA chief
  • 2 days We Are Better Than This
  • 2 days (Un)expectedly: UK Court Sets Assange U.S. Extradition Hearing For February 2020
Alt Text

Pentagon Accuses Iran Of Tanker Sabotage

The Pentagon has accused Iran’s…

Alt Text

Iran Won’t Leave OPEC

Iran has no intention of…

Alt Text

Iraq’s Ambitious Oil Plan Faces One Major Problem

Iraq has significantly increased its…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Chinese Oil Companies Apparent Victors in Post-Saddam Iraq

It was not supposed to be like this.

After 2003’s U.S.-led Operation Iraqi Freedom, Iraq’s vast oil reserves, a monopoly under the Baathist government of deposed President Saddam Hussein, were opened to foreign investment.

That optimistic assessment proved somewhat naïve however, as the country quickly descended into a prolonged power struggle between Sunni Arabs, who had dominated the Saddam administration, Shia Iraqis, the majority in the country, and northern Iraq’s Kurdish population, which had suffered years of repression.

Nevertheless, a political calm ultimately prevailed to the point where foreign oil companies could tentatively begin to explore and develop Iraq’s vast hydrocarbon riches, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reporting, “Iraq was the world’s 12th largest oil producer in 2009, and has the world’s fourth largest proven petroleum reserves after Saudi Arabia, Canada, and Iran. Just a fraction of Iraq’s known fields are in development, and Iraq may be one of the few places left where vast reserves, proven and unknown, have barely been exploited.”

The problem for foreign oil companies was who to deal with in the chaotic post-Saddam Iraqi political miasma? The alienated Sunnis, the increasingly dominant Shia, or the northern Kurds, who had their own quiet agenda of both carving out increased political autonomy from Baghdad while enticing foreign investment.

Related Article: The Coming Oil War in Iraq

Now, a major U.S. corporation after winning a massive contract in 2009 in southern Iraq from Baghdad, has decided to divest itself of its investment, there, preferring to develop Kurdish oil fields. And the major foreign contender for ExxonMobil’s Qurna-I concessions is – China.

West Qurna is one of Iraq's largest oil fields, located north of Rumaila field, west of Basra, and estimated to contain 43 billion barrels of recoverable reserves, making it potentially the world’s second largest “superfield” after Saudi Arabia's giant Ghawar oil field. In November 2009, an Exxon Mobil - Shell joint venture won a $50 billion contract to develop the estimated 9 billion barrel West Qurna Phase I, with Iraq’s Oil Ministry estimating that developing the site would require an initial $25 billion investment.

It now appears that China National Petroleum Corp. may acquire West Qurna-1 oilfield from Exxon Mobil. Iraqi and Chinese sources said that CNPC unit Petrochina is currently in negotiations for Exxon's 60 percent in the West Qurna-1 project. Speaking on condition of anonymity, a senior Iraqi official knowledgeable of the discussions said, "CNPC has shown interest; they are there. And from our side, there is no problem with them taking on a bigger position. We are not sensitive about this."

Related Article: Iran Asks OPEC to Cut Output so Countries can't Find Alternative Sources of Oil

Unlike the western interests increasingly focused on Iraq’s Kurdish regions, where oil must be sent via pipelines through Turkey, a major advantage for China of Qurna-1 is that the superfield’s crude could be sent out by sea from Iraq’s Persian Gulf Basra port.

Adding to China’s advantage in the bidding war for Qurna is the fact that the country’s search for energy resources worldwide already make China a major buyer of Iraqi crude. Furthermore, as access to global oil reserves is a high strategic priority for Beijing, China is willing to negotiate more severe terms and lower profits than Western oil majors and even Russia’s Lukoil in the interest of long term access. This will play well in Baghdad, as it confirms its sovereignty over the nation’s hydrocarbon reserves, even as ExxonMobil attempts to bypass the central government by cutting deals directly with the Kurdish Regional Government.

China’s offer of both financial largesse and political support is music to the regime of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s government in Baghdad, given that Iraq has the world's fourth-largest oil reserves and wants to at least double its production in the next few years and ultimately challenge Russia and Saudi Arabia as the world's biggest oil nation.
Looking at the view from inside the Beltway, ExxonMobil's departure from Qurna-1 would decimate America’s presence in Iraq's southern Shia oilfields – which will cause interested DC pundits to wonder – is this why America went to war in 2003, to overthrow Saddam to make the country safe for Chinese oil companies?

Perhaps Michael Corleone summed it up best – “its just business” – and ExxonMobil is not the U.S. government.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • Collin on December 28 2012 said:
    After Afghanistan and Iraq, I am coming to believe controling of Middle East is sort like trading for Stephen Marbury. He has the potential to be Hall Of Famer basketball player but every team that trades for him wins less. I say let the Chinese oil companies have Iraq oil and Afghanistan minerals. Either one of two things will happen. One, everybody profits and Middle East countries develop. Or Two, when the profits end, armed conflict starts.

    Long term that is not a bad deal.
  • don c on December 30 2012 said:
    ok, the usa taxpayer paid for the war......so the next court of law that gives the oil to someone else.....should be asked to get out of the usa

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News