• 3 hours LNG Glut To Continue Into 2020s, IEA Says
  • 5 hours Oil Nears $52 With Record OPEC Deal Compliance
  • 8 hours Saudi Aramco CEO Affirms IPO On Track For H2 2018
  • 10 hours Canadia Ltd. Returns To Sudan For First Time Since Oil Price Crash
  • 12 hours Syrian Rebel Group Takes Over Oil Field From IS
  • 3 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 4 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 4 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 4 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 5 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 5 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 7 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls

Breaking News:

LNG Glut To Continue Into 2020s, IEA Says

Alt Text

Kurdistan Accuses Baghdad Of Planning Oil Field Seizure

Kurdistan authorities have accused the…

Alt Text

Trump Just Made Iran A Wildcard

The impact of Trump’s decision…

$12M Bounty Hunt for al-Qaeda in Iran

$12M Bounty Hunt for al-Qaeda in Iran

It’s a lot of cash for prospective bounty hunters, and an equal amount of interesting politics here that we certainly can’t let slide by without pointing out some obvious conflicts of interest.

The US State Department is offering up $12 million in rewards for information leading to the capture of two senior al-Qaeda figures allegedly backed by Iran and “accused” of moving fighters and cash through Turkey into Syria to overthrow the regime of Bashar al-Assad.

Of the two al-Qaeda figures, Muhsin al-Fadhli, “senior facilitator and financer” is worth more--$7 million. His deputy, Adel Radi Saqr al-Wahabi al-Harbi, is worth $5 million.

Al-Fadhli, a Kuwaiti, was one of the key facilitators of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the late leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq.   

According to the State Department, the two are hiding out in Iran.     

We’ll take issue here with two key things: First, the US media’s purposeful misunderstanding of the Iran-al-Qaeda relationship (fostered most obviously by FOX News of recent Sesame-Street-is-Liberal-Brainwashing fame); second, the US (rather than Iranian) facilitation of jihadist infiltration of the Syrian rebels.

Iran and al-Qaeda are mortal enemies, much like the US and al-Qaeda are mortal enemies. But sometimes it is convenient to note that your enemy’s enemy is your friend. Thus, we find ourselves in this unique position.

Though the Sunni jihadists that comprise al-Qaeda are certainly no friends of Shi’ite Iran for a variety of reasons that span geopolitics and ideology, Iran has not been blind to the potential of occasionally throwing some support their way to target US forces in Iraq. At the same time, any support to al-Qaeda elements in Iraq was carefully balanced by ensuring a great deal more support for Shi’ite insurgent groups in Iraq.

One would, however, get the impression from mainstream headlines that there exists a new group called “Al-Qaeda in Iran”, which is not only untrue but impossible. If any al-Qaeda elements are in Iran with the blessing of the Iranian leadership, they are kept under house arrest and constant monitoring.

Related Article: Iran, Turkey & Syria increasing the Volatility of Oil Markets

This is contrary to opinion of the US Treasury Department, which holds that Iran is giving these al-Qaeda figures “freedom to operate and uninhibited travel in exchange for a guarantee it won’t conduct operations or recruit members in the country.”

Much like Iran has seen some advantage in an occasional fling with al-Qaeda, the US government, beginning most prolifically with George W. Bush, has taken this to a dangerously higher level, regardless and even because of 9/11. Of course, the public would rather not understand this policy, but we will in any case endeavor to explain it here.

After 9/11, the war on Iraq, The Bush II administration decided to refocus its efforts on Iran and saw an opportunity for this in its enemy—al-Qaeda, a radical Sunni solution for a Shi’ite problem. The fear was that Iran would succeed in creating a “Shi’ite crescent” with Assad in Syria, Hezbollah in Iran and its growing influence among Iraq’s dominate Shi’ites (courtesy of the US invasion).

The main theaters for this plan have been Lebanon, where the US and Saudis bolstered Sunni radical elements to challenge Iranian-backed Hezbollah; Iraq, in the form of the Sunni Awakening (Sahwa); and Syria. Bush thought that by weakening the Assad regime by also engaging the Saudis to bolster militant Sunni efforts he would destroy Iran’s chance of using this key ally to secure a Shi’ite crescent. 

Years later, we have the conflict in Syria. The idea was that the US could maintain control over their new jihadist friends. They cannot, and thus we have the uncertainty over what to do next in Syria. 

What we have now is a group of Syrian rebels who are not likely to overthrow Assad without a significant amount of help from the Sunni jihad camp. We also have a group of Syrian rebels who are fearful of what this means: and essentially it means that a post-Assad Syria will be a Sunni radical Syria that is arguably worse than anything Assad would have come up with (aside from an alliance with Iran) and that would sideline the Syrian opposition, at best. After all, we are talking about a likely 40% infiltration by Sunni radicals of the Syrian rebel force.

Related Article: Investing in Iraqi Oil and Gas: Too Risky?

Suddenly, the US is not sure if this is the best strategy—hence funds for arms for the Syrian rebels are less than forthcoming from the black budgets of the defense department.

So here is where we will take issue most vehemently: The US has been facilitating the movement of al-Qaeda types across the Turkish border into Syria to fight Assad. Yet suddenly this act is being laid at Iran’s feet. Iran certainly has little desire to see Assad overthrown by Sunni militants loyal to the Saudis.

Even with all this in mind, the $12 million is attractive. Why the bounty hunt, though? Is it that US intelligence isn’t capable of tracking these two down? Or is it because the primary aim of the reward announcement is political, not tactical? (In which case the suspects are not meant to be found.)  For the Obama administration, on the eve elections it a great publicity stunt that attempts to suggest there is such a thing as an organized “al-Qaeda in Iran” and that Iran, not the US, is arming Sunni jihadists in Syria (both wrong). It is meant to say that the administration is taking a tough stance on Iran and not considering creating another terrorist state out of Syria.

Of course, it’s also fodder for the Republican contenders to the throne, who are attempting to demonstrate that the Obama administration is in fact funding terrorists in Syria. This publicity stunt, however, glosses over the fact that this al-Qaeda-funding strategy was the brainchild of the Bush administration and that mess will take a long time to clean up.

In the meantime, for you bounty hunters out there, here are a few types to get you on the road. The two suspects are likely to be in one of three places:

Central Iran, if we are to believe the State Department (under house arrest—good luck with this one)

Iran’s Baloch province, home to a restive militant Sunni lot whose passions are being inspired by their Baloch brethren across the border in Pakistan and benefitting from the strategic largesse of the US and Saudis bent on destabilizing Iran from this angle as well

Iraq’s Anbar Province, where five new training camps have been set up by a regrouping al-Qaeda which is hoping to jump into the Syria melee very soon

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News