• 4 minutes Energy Armageddon
  • 6 minutes How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 10 minutes Wind droughts
  • 2 days "Biden Is Running U.S. Energy Security Into The Ground" by Irina Slav
  • 2 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 1 day "Natural Gas Price Fundamental Daily Forecast – Grinding Toward Summer Highs Despite Huge Short Interest" by James Hyerczyk & REUTERS on NatGas
  • 1 day "How to Calculate Your Individual ESG Score to ensure that your Digital ID 'benefits' and money are accessible"
  • 1 day Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 8 days "Forget Oil, The Real Crisis Is Diesel Inventories: The US Has Just 25 Days Left" by Zero Hedge - 5 Stars *****
  • 1 day The Federal Reserve and Money...Aspects which are not widely known
  • 6 days Is Europe heading for winter of discontent with extensive gas shortages?
  • 1 day "Europe’s Energy Crisis Has Ended Its Era Of Abundance" by Irina Slav
  • 1 day "Dodgy Demand Data? The Oil Price Collapse Conspiracy" by Alex Kimani
  • 8 days "The Global Digital ID Prison" by James Corbett of CorbettReport.com
  • 9 days Goldman Betting on Cryptocurrencies
  • 12 days Сryptocurrency predictions
RFE/RL staff

RFE/RL staff

RFE/RL journalists report the news in 21 countries where a free press is banned by the government or not fully established. We provide what many…

More Info

Premium Content

U.S. Warns Of “Catastrophic Consequences” If Putin Uses Nuclear Weapons

  • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy says Kyiv’s counteroffensive is seeing “positive results.”
  • Russian President Vladimir Putin’s nuclear threats are receiving mixed responses from the West.
  • British Prime Minister Liz Truss wrote the threats off as “bogus,” while the U.S. warned of “catastrophic consequences” if Putin “crosses the line.”

Ukraine's president said late on September 25 that there was fierce fighting taking place on the front lines of its 7-month-old defense against Russia's invasion but that Kyiv was seeing "positive results."

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's battlefield assessment came after he warned in a broadcast interview earlier in the day against dismissing Russian President Vladimir Putin's nuclear threats as Moscow's forces lose ground.

Meanwhile, new British Prime Prime Minister Liz Truss downplayed Putin's recent statements as "saber-rattling" and "bogus threats," and U.S. national-security adviser Jake Sullivan said Washington had outlined to Moscow the "catastrophic consequences" it would face if it used nuclear weapons against Ukraine.

In his nightly video address, Zelenskiy claimed gains against Russian forces in the eastern Donetsk, northeastern Kharkiv, and the southern Mykolayiv and Zaporizhzhya regions.

"We have positive results in several directions." he said.

Russia and its separatist allies in the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhya regions of Ukraine have been holding votes on possible independence and union with Russia that they call referendums but Kyiv and many in the international community have said are a sham.

The votes are scheduled to conclude on September 27.

They were announced amid Ukrainian counteroffensives in northeastern and eastern Ukraine that Kyiv has said have wrested back thousands of square kilometers this month.

Putin and other Russian officials have suggested the votes will result in an irreversible transformation of those areas to make them part of Russia. And Putin suggested this week that Moscow could use all means at its disposal to defend them.

After his speech to the UN General Assembly in New York, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was asked if Moscow would have grounds for using nuclear weapons to defend the annexed regions.

He said territory "further enshrined" in Russia's constitution "is under the full protection of the state."

Related: Putin Forces All Energy Workers To Register For Military Draft

Zelenskiy, who has vowed Ukraine will reclaim all of its lost territory, said in an interview with a U.S. broadcaster on September 25 that "maybe yesterday it was a bluff. Now, it could be a reality."

He added of Putin: "He wants to scare the whole world. These are the first steps of his nuclear blackmail. I don't think he's bluffing."

Truss told CNN in a September 25 interview: "We should not be listening to [Putin's] saber-rattling and his bogus threats."

"Instead, what we need to do is continue to put sanctions on Russia and continue to support the Ukrainians because if Putin is allowed to succeed, this wouldn't just send a terrible message in Europe and, of course, huge threats to the Ukrainian population themselves, but it also would send a message to other authoritarian regimes around the world that it's somehow acceptable to...invade a sovereign nation."

U.S. officials were less dismissive of the Kremlin threat.

"If Russia crosses this line, there will be catastrophic consequences for Russia; the United States will respond decisively," Sullivan said on U.S. television.

By RFE/RL

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on September 26 2022 said:
    What are the catastrophic consequences of which the United States is threatening President Putin if he uses nuclear weapons? The options are:

    1- Impose further and harsher sanctions on Russia but sanctions have failed utterly to deter Putin or frighten him.

    2- Involve US-led NATO directly in the fight inside Ukraine against Russian forces. The downside is that NATO countries become automatically a legitimate target for Russian nuclear missiles. This could precipitate a nuclear war.

    3- Enforce a no-fly zone over Ukraine but such a move could spark a direct conflict with Russia with the possibility of escalation to a nuclear war.

    4- The US could retaliate against a Russian use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine by attacking and sinking Russian Navy ships in the Black Sea. But it would lead to a corresponding retaliation by Russia against American targets and could precipitate a nuclear war between the two countries.

    So the risk of nuclear war is ever present since President Putin said he isn’t bluffing about using whatever weapons at his disposal to defend the eastern Ukraine regions if they vote to join Russia.

    I doubt that President Biden will retaliate in kind if Russia uses tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine because this will mean a nuclear war and the destruction of both his country and Russia and all for the sake of Ukraine. The US military doctrine is to wage war with overwhelming force against weaker enemies. A case in point is Iraq. But when their enemy is capable of inflicting as much damage on them as it receives, they will think twice before starting a war.

    Against such a very gloomy and dangerous situation, President Biden might call for a ceasefire in the Ukraine and agree to address Russia’s legitimate security concerns, something he could have done before the hostilities started but for lack of statesmanship.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News