• 8 minutes U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 13 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 16 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 37 mins Despite pressure about Khashoggi's Murder: Saudi Arabia Reassures On Oil Supply, Says Will Meet Demand
  • 17 hours Nuclear Pact/Cold War: Moscow Wants U.S. To Explain Planned Exit From Arms Treaty
  • 10 hours Knoema: Crude Oil Price Forecast: 2018, 2019 and Long Term to 2030
  • 5 hours Merkel Aims To Ward Off Diesel Car Ban In Germany
  • 59 mins Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 17 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 14 hours Iraq war and Possible Lies
  • 4 mins Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 10 hours Get on Those Bicycles to Save the World
  • 1 day Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 1 day Long-Awaited Slowdown in China Exports Still Isn’t Happening
  • 12 mins Aramco to Become Major Player in LNG?
  • 11 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
Alt Text

Trump’s Tariffs Lead To Selloff In Oil Markets

The announcement of the Trump…

Alt Text

World Bank To Cut Off Oil & Gas Funding

In accordance with the Paris…

Alt Text

Venezuela Takes Unprecedented Action To Stabilize Currency

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro has…

Robert M Cutler

Robert M Cutler

More Info

Trending Discussions

EU Raids BP and Shell Over Price-Fixing Concerns

Following on the Libor and Euribor interest rate fixing scandals, the European Commission (EC, the executive arm of the EU) has just on Tuesday this week raided the offices of major energy companies BP and Royal Dutch Shell over allegations of price-fixing. The offices of StatOil in Norway, not an EU member, were also subject to "unannounced inspections" there.

Price-fixing in this sector could inflate not only the price of gasoline at the pump and airline tickets but anything made from petroleum derivatives. These include such common materials used in everyday consumer products as plastics and wax.

The concern is that the companies "may have colluded in reporting distorted prices" to Platts, arguably the leading oil pricing agency, and "prevented others from participating in the price assessment process", causing a "distorti[on of] published prices." Unlike trades on the New York Stock Exchange, for example, a complete record of all transactions is not made available. Rather, Platts publishes benchmarks upon which refiners and distributors rely for pricing their purchases.

Related article: How to Spot the Big Oil & Gas M&A Deals of the Future

Part of the problem is that participation in the reporting is voluntary, and traders are not required to report all their trades. This means that selective reporting can be strategized to their own benefit. And some commodities are not reported every day. Collusion in price reporting would represent a violation of various European antitrust rules prohibiting restrictive business practices and abuse of dominant market position.

StatOil offered the comment that what is involved is the Platts market-on-close assessment, which reports prices for various crude and refined oil products, including biofuel. EU officials quickly clarified that such inspections are not an accusation of malfeasance but rather a regular, preliminary step in any investigation. Indeed, they are the sort of inspections carried out by EU officials in the European offices of the Russian company Gazprom in September 2011 over other, different concerns about anti-competitive behavior.

Related article: Canada’s Oil Sands Threatened by Lack of Market

In Gazprom's case, the questions are also about pricing, but rather long-term than short-term market pricing. What is concerned here is the long-term contracts between Gazprom and the companies that it supplies, in particular the inequitable linking of natural gas and oil pricing, as well as contract conditions hindering the energy trade among the EU members and their diversification of energy supply. After the winter cut-offs of natural gas supplies to Europe by Russia in January 2006 and January 2009, the EU's Third Energy Package mandates that member-states should diversify their suppliers.

According to reports, it is not excluded that potential violations by BP, Shell, and StatOil may have begun over a decade ago, in 2002. Companies that have been found in violation of the EU's competition rules may be subject to fines as large as 10 per cent of their annual revenue.

By. Robert M Cutler




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Earl Richards on May 18 2013 said:
    BP and Shell would have no problem in rigging the oil markets, because they partners in the IntercontinentalExchange (ICE). ICE Futures Europe is a subsidiary of ICE. Google the "$2.5 Trillion Oil Scam - slideshare." Most of the world is a victim of scam. Plug your Tesla S, electric car into your household, solar array.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News