• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 2 hours WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 3 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 7 hours OPEC's No. 2 Producer Wants to Know How Buyers Use Its Oil
  • 1 hour Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 9 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 10 hours U.S. - Saudi Arabia: President Trump Says Saudi Arabia's King Wouldn't Survive "Two Weeks" Without U.S. Backing
  • 4 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 3 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 2 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 5 mins COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 6 hours Who's Ready For The Next Contest?
  • 10 hours Superhumans
  • 7 hours China Thirsty for Canadian Crude
Alt Text

Why The Oil Price Rally May Soon End

Not everyone seems to think…

Alt Text

What’s Next For Oil Prices?

Oil markets will continue to…

Andy Tully

Andy Tully

Andy Tully is a veteran news reporter who is now the news editor for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Canada: A Microcosm Of The Ultimate Effect Of Low Oil Prices?

Canada: A Microcosm Of The Ultimate Effect Of Low Oil Prices?

Canada’s economy, lately driven in large part by oil, is a classic example of the old see-saw axiom: Downward pressure in one place creates upward pressure in another.

In this case, the bad news of low oil prices for the provinces of Alberta, Newfoundland and Saskatchewan, which until recently were enjoying an oil boom, becomes good news for Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec.

Alberta is a good model for what’s begun to go wrong in Canada. Already, three huge oil companies have canceled oil sands projects there: Shell of Britain at Pierre River, Statoil of Norway at the Corner oil field and France’s Total at the Joslyn mine. And more cancellations are expected as what feels like a non-stop drop in oil prices drives even more energy companies to postpone or even cancel projects.

Related: How Broken Are The Energy Markets?

The reason is that Alberta, Newfoundland and Saskatchewan have been experiencing a boom not in oil, but in oil sands, sandstone impregnated with crude oil. While shale oil is expensive to extract, oil sands are expensive to clean. And at the current average price of crude, which is now just above $50 per barrel, both forms of oil are becoming less and less profitable.

All this means hard times ahead for Alberta, and it’s becoming a recurring nightmare. Oil prices dropped fairly precipitously in the 1980s, but the province’s premier at the time, Don Getty, chose to keep his government’s spending static in hopes that oil would recover. Instead, energy revenues fell by $3 billion, creating a provincial deficit of $3.4 billion.

Getty’s successor, Ralph Klein, began his term attacking the deficit, dramatically slashing spending on such programs as the arts and medical care, and even sold off Alberta’s public telephone company, AGT, to private owners.

Alberta’s budget isn’t all that’s at risk from lower oil prices. When a region goes from boom to bust, it also loses jobs in the field and in company offices, which today are housed in modern skyscrapers that define Calgary’s dramatic skyline.

The bad news for Alberta, though, can be very good news for other provinces whose economies aren’t driven by oil. For these provinces, such as Ontario, declining fuel prices mean lower production costs and even more jobs.

Related: If Shell Backs Out, Arctic Oil Off the Table for Years

“Eventually, as we move through 2015, assuming the oil price stays low, it will start contributing to some weakness showing up in Alberta and Saskatchewan,” Paul Ferley, assistant chief economist at RBC Economics Research, told Canada’s Financial Post. “This should also result in a pickup in manufacturing in Ontario, as well as provide a lift in Manitoba and Quebec.”

Still, Canada’s overall economy relies enough on oil that its lower price can’t help but hurt, if only a little. On Nov. 12, the country’s finance minister, Joe Oliver, said the price drop could cut federal revenues by up to $2.5 billion each year from 2015 through 2019. And that was based on the average price of oil in mid-November – $70 per barrel – nearly $20 higher than it is today.

That can’t be good for Canada’s gross domestic product, and by extension it isn’t good for the country’s employment status. Still, Ferley said, his firm is “not expecting a big hit to GDP, so on net, nationally, we’re not expecting a big hit on the overall [employment] numbers.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Rich on January 07 2015 said:
    We see a historic move up in natural gas in the futures market. The demand will be much stinger we see a move above 7.70. We can see a move much higher
  • Rich on January 07 2015 said:
    We see a huge move up on natural gas futures a monster short squeeze. We see reports tomorrow either way natural gas go up . We see a spike up. .50 cents I. Day . We can go to 9. LNG demand on ceiling . Historic up move in natural gas beyond to a. The price will rise
  • Gavin on February 18 2015 said:
    Andy, you should revisit some of your comments. First, it's wrong to suggest that low prices helps Ontario and Quebec. I work in the Oilsands, and I can tell you that thousands of the contract workers and full time employees there come from Ontario and Quebec. Capex cutbacks due to low oil prices mean that many of these workers will be returning home unemployed. Besides this, most of the manufacturing jobs pundits claim will magically appear there due to low oil prices and a lower Canadian dollar, have long been permanently exported to cheaper labour markets. Besides this, the $10 billion Alberta sends the East annually as equalization payments, will end, creating further fiscal problems there. Second, Shell is a Dutch firm, not British. This error could be excused if you weren't presenting yourself and an expert in the industry.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News