• 15 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 17 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 19 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 20 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 21 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 22 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 23 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 1 day New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 1 day Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 1 day Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 1 day Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 2 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 5 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

2 Red Flags For The World’s Top Shale Play

Changing legislation and taxation for…

Alt Text

The U.S. LNG Boom Could Be About To Stall

United States LNG has seen…

Llewellyn King

Llewellyn King

Llewellyn King is the executive producer and host of "White House Chronicle" on PBS. His e-mail address is lking@kingpublishing.com

More Info

What Shale Oil and Gas Can Learn from Nuclear

What Shale Oil and Gas Can Learn from Nuclear

The Arab oil embargo, imposed on the United States 40 years ago this fall, brought the instant chaos of gas lines, dire predictions and a new concentration of political minds on the Middle East. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) became a household word -- and a pejorative one at that. The economy shuddered.

Although directed against the West for supporting Israel, the embargo unleashed general global frustration with the way U.S. and European oil companies had negotiated contracts and with the modest returns the oil-producing countries were getting for their asset.

With the largest proven reserves, Saudi Arabia became, in some ways, the most important country on Earth. A small, desert monarchy – more like medieval than modern monarchies -- was both courted and reviled.

Even when the embargo was lifted in March 1974, the crisis continued throughout the decade – and new chaos gripped the world with the Iranian Revolution of 1979. Inflation ravaged the world; in 1974, 24 heads of state lost their jobs due to the inflation.

Oilprice.com Premium: Get the same inside information as the CEOs of Exxon, Chevron and BP - as fast as they get it, often before they get it

In 1975, Congress converted the Atomic Energy Commission into the Energy Research and Development Administration; later, President Jimmy Carter upped the government role with the creation of the Department of Energy. Congress also, in 1978, passed a rather crazy piece of legislation, long repealed, called the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act, which posited that natural gas was in such short supply and so precious that it could not be used for much of anything except fertilizer and industrial processes – no electricity generation, ornamental flames or pilot lights.

Heroics in Congress did little to fix the situation. But plodding, technological innovation, much of it in government research programs, did. Drilling improved and took a giant step forward with the perfection of horizontal drilling. Also the old oilfield practice of geological fracturing (fracking) improved substantially, opening a bonanza of new oil and gas and changing the face of oil and gas production by putting shale deposits into big-time play.

The world energy picture is turned upside down now. The impossible in 1973 – energy self-sufficiency for the United States -- is in sight.

But all could be lost.

There is mounting evidence that fracking can cause seismic temblors thousands of miles from the site. The fracking is not the culprit but rather the disposal of the brine used to do it.

Oilprice.com Premium: Find out first about the latest technology and technology investments being made by energy industry insiders

The key ingredient in fracking besides water is sand, which wedges itself between the shale rocks and allows the gas or oil to come out. But sand -- or silicate as the drillers like to call it – doesn't suspend in water, so chemicals are added. This makes the water useless for other functions and it is disposed of in “injection wells” where tens of thousands of gallons of waste water, chemicals and other impurities that have been picked up are forced into the ground and abandoned. There are thousands and thousands of these waste-water dump wells across the United States.

Now comes a study, conducted by England's Durham University and published in the journal Science, which confirms that seismic activity, and possibly major earthquakes, can be triggered by injection wells, banned in the United Kingdom and elsewhere in Europe. Sadly, many drillers have reacted with denial. The industry should throw a lot of science at the problem quickly, before a major event is blamed on fracking and the brave new world of abundance is shut down.

The nuclear industry, always sure of its safety, responded to the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 by vastly improving that safety regime and establishing new national and international institutions devoted solely to best practices and enhanced safety. After the Japanese experience at Fukushima Daiichi, the nuclear world again tightened its standards and expectations.
But it has never totally regained public confidence, and that is important.

If fracking could, as the Durham study suggests, lead to a major earthquake, that event would be as catastrophic for shale oil and gas recovery as Three Mile Island was for nuclear power. And if the public comes to believe that earthquakes are triggered by fracking, then the hope of energy independence will be doomed and the 1970s could be replayed.

By. Llewellyn King

Llewellyn King is executive producer and host of “White House Chronicle” on PBS. His e-mail is lking@kingpublishing.com.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • bmz on July 24 2013 said:
    If this weren't provable poppycock, the author would provide a searchable citation to the "study."
  • Steve Everley, Energy In Depth on July 26 2013 said:
    "There is mounting evidence that fracking can cause seismic temblors thousands of miles from the site. The fracking is not the culprit but rather the disposal of the brine used to do it."

    These two sentences highlight a serious flaw in how "fracking" is being described by all too many reporters and pundits. Read both of these sentences, and you'll notice that they contradict each other. And yet, there's an insistence on blaming "fracking" for as much as possible -- even if it's not actually fracking, but rather something else. We're not engaging in a fact-based dialogue if we are simply looking for as many ways to implicate fracking as possible.

    No doubt, the author will claim that since fracking produces wastewater, then the disposal of that wastewater should be discussed in the context of fracking. In the context? Yes. Conflating a very specific process in shale development (fracking) with a disposal technique that's been around for decades? No.

    Need more proof? The major study that was recently released looked at three wastewater disposal sites that weren't even receiving wastewater from fracking operations! Is that mentioned? Is that carefully fleshed out? Of course not. "Fracking" is a hot topic, and great for search engine optimization. The fact that including it obscures the facts is apparently less important -- and that's really unfortunate.
  • TheContrarian on August 22 2013 said:
    Energy self-sufficiency?! Ahahahahahahahah!

    It's a joke I keep reading everywhere, but it cracks me up every time. More, please.

    In case you wanted facts instead of buzzwords, read (amongst others) https://oilprice.com/Energy/Natural-Gas/Can-the-US-Export-its-Way-to-Energy-Independence.html

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News