• 4 minutes Pompeo: Aramco Attacks Are An "Act Of War" By Iran
  • 7 minutes Who Really Benefits From The "Iran Attacked Saudi Arabia" Narrative?
  • 11 minutes Trump Will Win In 2020
  • 15 minutes Experts review Saudi damage photos. Say Said is need to do a lot of explaining.
  • 18 mins Ethanol, the Perfect Home Remedy for A Saudi Oil Fever
  • 6 hours Hong Kong protesters appeal to Trump for support.
  • 4 hours Millennials: A boil on the butt of the work ethic
  • 5 hours A little something for all you Offshore swabbies
  • 18 hours Iran Vows Major War Even If US Conducts "Limited Strikes"
  • 13 hours Ban Fracking? What in the World Are Democrats Thinking?
  • 16 hours Europe: The Cracks Are Beginning To Show
  • 40 mins When Trying To Be Objective About Ethanol, Don't Include Big Oil Lies To Balance The Argument
  • 4 hours Memorize date 05/15/2018 cause Huawei ban is the most important single event in world history after 9/11/2001.
  • 52 mins LA Times: Vote Trump out in 2020 to Prevent Climate Apocalypse
  • 3 hours Saudi State-of-Art Defense System looking the wrong way. MBS must fire Defense Minister. Oh, MBS is Defense Minister. Forget about it.
  • 6 hours US and China are already in a full economic war and this battle for global hegemony is a little bit frightening
  • 4 hours Shale profitability
  • 13 hours Let's shut down dissent like The Conversation in Australia
Alt Text

US To Supply More Than Half Of Global Gas By 2035

The United States is expected…

Alt Text

U.S. And Russia Battle It Out Over This Huge Iraqi Gas Field

The geopolitically strategic gas field…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

The Beginning Of The End For Europe’s Natural Gas War

Russia’s Gazprom is on the verge of striking a deal with EU regulators to settle a half-decade old dispute over natural gas pricing, and the resolution could change the way Gazprom does business and lead to lower gas prices for much of Eastern Europe.

The conflict began back in 2011 when EU antitrust regulators began investigating Gazprom for anticompetitive behavior, citing Gazprom’s practice of pricing natural gas differently to different countries depending on how compliant they were to Moscow. The EU Commission launched a formal investigation that ultimately led to negotiations, which were temporarily put on ice after Russia’s takeover of Crimea.

The details are arcane, but Gazprom is about to offer concessions to the EU in order to avoid potentially having to pay billions of dollars in fines. These include allowing recipients of Russian gas to resell that gas. Gazprom has opposed that practice because it undercuts their ability to demand certain prices from individual customers and countries. Gazprom and Russia were much happier under the old system, in which they could sign an array of bilateral deals on an individual basis, rather than negotiating with European countries collectively. That allowed the company to tie gas contracts to political aims – should a European country lend its support to a Russian cause, such as a pipeline, they would receive better terms.

That leads to the second concession that Gazprom will have to grant Europe: they will have to charge customers similar rates for natural gas. But the agreement stops short of entirely breaking Gazprom’s practice of linking gas prices to oil prices.

“We are now putting the final touch to our commitment proposal. It will be sent to the European Commission shortly,” Alexander Medvedev, Gazprom’s deputy chairman, said this week after meeting with the EU’s top antitrust official, Margrethe Vestager. The deal is not yet secured – it still needs to be reviewed by European countries – but if it is, Gazprom will avoid having to pay billions of dollars in fines. However, the agreement could then become legally binding, subjecting Gazprom to European law, something it has objected to up until now. Gazprom would have to pay fines if it violates the terms of the agreement.

The settlement would seem to bolster relations between Russia and Europe, which had become strained in recent years after the conflict in Ukraine. Some countries in Eastern Europe are wary of such a thaw and have demanded a much tougher line from European officials. Others in Europe that are at odds with Russia’s actions in Ukraine and Syria are not eager to soften the tone either. To be sure, the settlement over the antitrust charges still needs to survive input from European governments. Poland, in particular, is not happy with the deal. “These decisions pose a real threat to the stability of gas supplies to central and eastern Europe,” the Polish state-owned oil and gas company PGNiG said in a statement.

Resolving the conflict could also lead to more Russian gas flowing into Europe, which already depends on Russia for about one-third of its gas needs. Russia is hoping to double the gas flows through the Nord Stream pipeline, hoping to gain some market share in a market that is no longer growing. Again, European officials, especially in Eastern Europe, are not keen to see a greater reliance on Russian gas. But the business interests involved in building the expansion of the Nord Stream pipeline, as well as German officials who feel comfortable with Russia as a reliable source of energy, are pushing the deal forward.

“Another missing point of these puzzles is the future of Nord Stream 2,” a Polish official told the FT. “Now, it looks like they give the Russians too much.”

Overall, though, the deal would solidify some changes already underway. Gazprom has already begun to link its gas prices closer to hub prices. It needs to do that anyway because it is seeing increased competition from other sources of natural gas, particularly LNG. The U.S. began sending LNG to Europe, and several new LNG ships and import terminals are allowing a few European countries, such as Lithuania, to gain leverage over Gazprom. No longer at the mercy of one supplier, parts of Europe are becoming emboldened to demand lower gas prices from Russia. Whether EU officials will force Gazprom’s hand or not, the Russian gas giant will be forced to keep a lid on its gas prices if it wants to avoid losing market share.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Amvet on October 28 2016 said:
    The EU´s treatment of Russia and Gazprom has been shameful.
    Russia was a reliable supplier but was attacked by the US and its camp followers.

    One can only hope that the stabbing in the back done to the Russians by the Europeans can return in spades. This may happen. Spot prices are used and, surprise, there is a shortage of gas.
  • Alfred on November 01 2016 said:
    It would seem that some Europeans have decided to think of their own self-interest - for a change. I mean, the whole sanctions nonsense (i.e. economic war) against Russia hurt Europe far more than the USA.

    It also looks as though Ukraine will be left to stew in its own juices.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play