• 4 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 7 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 11 minutes Algorithms Taking Over Oil Fields
  • 14 mintues NIGERIAN CRUDE OIL
  • 9 hours How Much Oil Does Aramco Have?
  • 14 hours Spy&State: Huawei Founder Says Firm Does Not Spy For China
  • 40 mins Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 4 hours BofA Sees Oil at $35-70
  • 44 mins How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 32 mins "Peace Agreement" Russia vs Japan: Control Over Islands Not Up For Discussion
  • 4 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 20 hours China's Exports Shrink Most In Two Years, Raising Risks To Global Economy
  • 5 hours China Car Sales Plummet: Can Musk Unshovel His Groundbreaking?
  • 15 hours Oil Slide Worries Traders. *relax* This Should Get Sorted by Year End.
  • 1 day protests in Canada over pipeline
  • 22 hours Bolsonaro Wins in Brazil
  • 25 mins WSJ: Gun Ownership on Rise in Europe After Terror Attacks, Sexual Assaults
  • 1 hour Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
Alt Text

The Mediterranean Pipeline Wars Are Heating Up

The Eastern Mediterranean gas scene…

Alt Text

Natural Gas Prices Could Fall Further

Natural gas prices rallied to…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Surging Australian Gas Prices Turn Asian Consumers Towards Russia

The world’s largest market for natural gas imports is East Asia, dominated by the economies of China, Japan and South Korea, all largely bereft of indigenous resources.

The trio’s importance to energy-exporting economies, battered by the global recession that began in 2008, has never been higher, leaving the trio to choose amongst a number of suppliers, with China favoring pipelines crisscrossing Central Asia, lessening its exposure to maritime liquefied natural gas imports from such volatile regions as the Middle East, to Japan and South Korea, currently the world’s largest LNG importer, eyeing any and all options.

Australia, previously having regarded itself as East Asia’s energy back yard, is about to experience some major “blowback” on its predatory “buy cheap, sell dear” policies, with a rising competitor being – the Russian Arctic.

The Russian Federation’s Novatek, which holds 80 percent of the Yamal LNG development license, is offering a 29 percent holding sale to help fund development.

The downside?

Related article: Environmental Issues that Could De-Rail the Natural Gas Boom

Novatek has no rights yet to export future production.

Problems with Moscow aside, Novatek is second only to the Russian Federation’s Gazprom natural gas state monopoly, being Russia’s second largest producer.

Obviously seeing its future in eastern Asia, Novatek via Yamal LNG has set up a 100 percent subsidiary company, Yamal Trade Pte. Ltd., to trade on Asian stock exchanges, with the company registered in Singapore.

The deal represents Kremlinology at its finest.

In late 2011 Novatek pressured the Kremlin to end Gapzrom’s monopoly to export LNG, currently a Gazprom monopoly. Moving at extraordinary speed for the Russian bureaucracy, earlier this month the Presidential Commission on Energy considered the feasibility of liberalizing the country’s LNG export policies, and Russian President Vladimir Putin instructed the government to study the possibility of liberalizing the nation’s export of LNG, with analysts believing that a governmental decision on the issue will be hammered out by the end of next month.

While Gazprom's current monopoly on Russian natural gas exports is seen as a major barrier to the Novatek’s sale, the fact that it is being considered at all represents an extraordinary policy shift in the Kremlin’s thinking towards dealing with companies that can move quickly to nail down Russia’s market advantage in Asia, as Asian options face rising costs, with Novatek chief financial officer Mark Gyetvay citing the rising costs of Australian projects being pursued by Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron and others making Russia’s Yamal arctic option more alluring. Earlier this week Gyetvay said, "From our experience with the Australian side we are seeing more interest from Asia-Pacific buyers to look at our project, where a year ago their primary focus would have been closer to home. We are talking to companies now in the Asia-Pacific region largely because they see that there's a huge amount of risk from all these Australian projects … that either may not come on stream, or they can get a better deal by coming into a more cost-effective, conventional onshore type development."

Related article: To Avoid Volatile Gasoline Prices, Why not use More Natural Gas?

A not insignificant threat to Australian energy expansion plans, as the country currently has nearly $190 billion of LNG export projects under construction that would add more than 80 million tons per annum of LNG production by 2020, an increase that would make the country the world's top LNG exporter.

The downside Down Under?

Late last year, three of the seven Australian LNG projects in early stages of construction announced cost hikes averaging more than 20 percent, primarily caused by rising labor costs and the strong Australian dollar.

Gyetvay sees advantage in the chaos, telling reporters, "There've been discussions over the last week with the Russian government about liberalizing the LNG markets, and we'll wait for them to come back to us, supposedly by the end of March."

Place your bets – kangaroo vs. the bear in the land of the rising sun.

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Ronald Wagner on February 28 2013 said:
    The eagle is coming too though.
  • Philip Andrews on March 04 2013 said:
    This article reminds me of the article in Stratfor.com;

    http://www.stratfor.com/sample/geopolitical-diary/china-and-russia-building-energy-land-bridge

    which talks of the energy relationship between Russia and China. They make the interesting point that in the event of a confrontation between China and the US, the US would likely carry out a sea blockade of China.

    This would then necessitate China relying on Russia for a large part of her energy supplies and Central Asia. Also on railways such as the TS for importing goods from the West through Russia. It might learn much from Iran about blockade/sanction survival strategies.

    The point being that the present Western: Eurasian impasse re Iran and China is probably leading the leaders of those countries plus Russia seeking ways to enlarge trade routes overland to avoid the US ability to blockade. This in turn will mean that China for example will think twice about importing energy and goods by sea if she can get them overland - a modern revived Silk Route. At present this won't make that much difference, but in the longer term, Eurasia may strive for greater internal overland trade in basic commodities to avoid hostile sea activity causing economic collapse.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News