• 3 hours Saudi Aramco CEO Affirms IPO On Track For H2 2018
  • 5 hours Canadia Ltd. Returns To Sudan For First Time Since Oil Price Crash
  • 6 hours Syrian Rebel Group Takes Over Oil Field From IS
  • 3 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 3 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 3 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 3 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 4 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 4 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 4 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 5 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 5 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 5 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 5 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 6 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 6 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 6 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 7 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 7 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 7 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
Gregory Brew

Gregory Brew

Gregory Brew is a researcher and analyst based in Washington D.C. He is currently pursuing a PhD at Georgetown University in oil history and American…

More Info

How Trump Could Change LNG Markets

Pipeline

The surprise victory of Donald Trump in the November 8 U.S. presidential election is still being processed by news outlets and industry analysts worldwide. But while the outlook for oil and gas has widely been positive—Trump has repeatedly vowed to cut environmental regulations, open up federal land for drilling and sign off on pipeline projects—the impact of his presidency on American natural gas, and the LNG industry in particular, is a little harder to gauge.

While many Trump policy proposals remain vague and ill-defined, it seems certain that his administration will encourage increased U.S. natural gas production, both onshore and offshore. A key analyst for GlobalData has predicted Trump will open up new leases for shale and oil drilling in Alaska while also confirming the divisive KeyStone XL pipeline. It seems likely that Trump will confirm the North Dakota Access pipeline, currently held up by strong protests, thus kick-starting production in the Bakken. Trump holds personal investments in Energy Transfers Partners and Phillips 66, both sponsors of the project.

This, together with the greater crude piped in from Alberta, will improve the supply side of crude oil. GlobalData pointed out, however, that the likely emphasis of Trump’s policies on domestic, rather than international considerations could end up complicating the overall impact of these developments. His vow to carry out a trade war with China, as well as his calls for heavy tariffs on imported goods and for US energy independence, could limit US access to export markets and reduce the competitiveness of US energy products.

That’s where things get complicated for LNG. Federal clearance is needed to approve additional LNG export terminals, and an expansion in American LNG export capacity would need at least some cooperation from the federal government. Charif Souki, former head of Cheniere Energy, spoke in Paris last week, saying that President Trump’s protectionist policies won’t get in the way of business. Souki’s Tellurian Investments is planning a new LNG export plant in Louisiana, Driftwood LNG, with construction set to begin in 2018. The plan will have a capacity of 26 million metric tons per year. Related: Expert Commentary: Why OPEC Has To Make A Deal Happen

As of October 2016, the U.S. government has confirmed a number of LNG import and export terminals, mostly in the Gulf of Mexico, while Canada has approved four of its own in British Columbia and Nova Scotia. Should all approved terminals be constructed, total North American LNG export capacity will increase dramatically.

Other oil and gas experts believed the impact of Trump’s policies may be minimal; they noted that rhetoric on the campaign trail wasn’t always a great indicator of actual policy plans. Certainly Trump’s confusion over what LNG is doesn’t generate confidence. But if Trump is serious about putting “America first” and concentrates on domestic demand rather than exports, it could be an obstacle to those like Souki who see a future for the U.S. as a major energy exporter.

Trump’s aggressive stance regarding Mexico, a major partner in the American energy industry, could complicate U.S. natural gas exports south of the border. In 2016 U.S. natural gas imports to Mexico exceeded Mexican domestic production, and this trend will likely continue in years to come. Trump’s vows to build a wall along the Mexican-American border, limit immigration and generally re-evaluate U.S. polices towards Mexico could seriously impede further natural gas exports. Related: Does A Link Remain Between Inflation And Oil Prices?

Others are more confident. A recent contributor to the Houston Chronicle noted that LNG would benefit from the slowly emerging “revolution” in global natural gas prices, which are now more free-flowing and transparent than in the past, when spot prices would vary widely and profits rested on long-term contracts. As global prices fell, U.S. gas production ramped up and opportunities emerged in Europe, which has been dependent on Russian natural gas for years. Even with the increase in the global natural gas trade, LNG represents only about 10 percent of the market, and will likely rise to 15 percent by 2020.

But that optimism could be misplaced. American LNG exports to Europe have yet to materialize, Russian gas remains competitive, and with Trump’s apparently close relationship with Russian president Vladimir Putin acting as a stop to any strategically-focused U.S. energy initiatives, the likelihood of U.S. export ambitions to Europe being realized seems remote. Moreover, heavy investment has created the possibility of an LNG supply glut for the foreseeable future.

On Wednesday the EIA released a report indicating record high levels of natural gas inventories, a sign that supply is out-pacing demand. The IEA, meanwhile, predicts global natural gas demand to outstrip demand for other fossil fuels; while the Trump Administration will have an impact on U.S. energy policy, the IEA doesn’t anticipate the change in U.S. government to alter major shifts in global energy use. “Governments come and go around the world…We will wait for real policies to be announced and put in place,” said the IEA statement.

LNG enthusiasts like Souki and major players like Cheniere, which has invested billions in LNG export terminals, will keep banking on growth in global natural gas demand to keep their businesses afloat. President Trump may embark on isolationist, “America first” energy policies that prove detrimental to energy exports. Then again, he may not. And even if he does, market conditions and global trends could continue shaping the natural gas landscape. The contributions of the new American president and his administration could end up being rather limited.

By Gregory Brew for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Bill Simpson on November 22 2016 said:
    As he has done his entire life, Trump will do whatever he thinks will put the most money in his pocket. He won't cancel NAFTA, or start any trade war with China, because he knows that the resultant depression could wreck his personal business empire. Another Great Depression would take all but the super rich down. The Donald isn't there yet, but will be by the time he leaves office, with the US military as his free enforcement/ insurance company.
    It's funny to watch all the 'never Trump' Republicans have to grovel for a few of the crumbs.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News