• 4 mintues Texas forced to have rolling brown outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 7 minutes Forecasts for oil stocks.
  • 9 minutes Biden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs
  • 13 minutes European gas market to 2040 according to Platts Analitics
  • 11 hours Fukushima
  • 2 days America's pandemic dead deserve accountability after Birx disclosure
  • 15 hours Today Biden calls for Summit with Putin. Will Joe apologize to Putin for calling him a "Killer" ?
  • 1 day CO2 Mitigation on Earth and Magnesium Civilization on Mars – Just Add Water
  • 5 hours Simple question: What is the expected impact in electricity Demand when EV deployment exceeds 10%
  • 6 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 9 hours Biden about to face first real test. Russia building up military on Ukraine border.
  • 11 hours Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 1 day New Chinese Coal Plants Equal All those in U.S.A
  • 4 days Does .001 of Atmosphere Control Earth's Climate?!
  • 3 days Oh the Dems!!! They cheer for helping people while stabbing them in the back!!! Enbridge asks Canadian government to support oil pipeline in dispute with Michigan
  • 3 days The coming Cyber Attack
  • 5 days NG spot prices hit triple digits for weekend delivery

Breaking News:

Oil Soars 5% As Bullish News Mounts

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Dow Opposes US Natural Gas Export Plans

Dow Chemical CO. (NYSE:DOW) is opposed to the idea of unlimited US natural gas exports, and this opposition has led it most recently to completely disown a $6.5 billion project for a Texas export terminal that it partly owns.

Earlier this week, Dow management publicly disavowed Texas-based Freeport LNG, which it partly owns with a limited partner status.

Dow vice president of energy and climate change George Biltz told Bloomberg: “Dow is not going to be part of the new investment. We have taken no role and haven’t worked with them at all” on the export proposal.”

The Freeport LNG export terminal is hoping for federal permission to cool 1.4 billion cubic feet of gas into liquid natural gas (LNG) daily. This LNG would be transported to overseas markets.

Related Article: Betting on Mediterranean Shale: 3 Plays, 1 Winner

Dow is opposed to this project because its senior management believes high volumes of LNG exports will lead to higher prices at home, which in turn would bode ill for the future construction of chemical plants and Dow’s overall bottom line.

Dow’s limited partnership status in the company has brought the conflict of interest to the forefront, not least because it owns a gas-important facility right next to it. Essentially, Freeport wants to expand this gas-import terminal into an expert facility, complete with the necessary refrigeration units and storage tanks. It needs $6.5 billion to do it—and Dow has made it clear that it will not invest a penny in the venture.

Dow rose 1 percent to $34.43 at the close in New York. The stock has increased 6.5 percent this year. Dow is worried that unlimited exports and sees its future in using the shale gas revolution to boost domestic projects—not exports.

In this battle, Dow also finds itself at odds with Exxon Mobil Corp., one of the most vocal proponents of unlimited US gas exports, the profits from which it insists will outpace any potential prices increases at home.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Gordon Steingart on January 28 2013 said:
    I will side with Exxon on this one. If Dow believes Natural gas being exported limits the progress of industrial expansion domestically ,then they should read up on nuclear power. That's the domestic solution,not fossil fuels .

    Dow Chemicals is trapped in a time warp.
  • Fact vs Fiction on January 31 2013 said:
    Where has Dow actually said they had actually "completely disown" their 15% stake in the $6.5 billion project? Did they sell it? Divest it? They still have that stake and they WILL still profit.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News