• 4 minutes Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
  • 9 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 17 minutes Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 23 hours Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
  • 2 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 13 hours Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 8 hours Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 2 hours Corruption On The Top: Netanyahu's Wife Charged With Misuse of Public Funds for Meals
  • 4 hours Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 5 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 8 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 4 hours U.S. Withdraws From U.N. Human Rights Council
  • 8 hours OPEC Meeting Could End Without Decision - Irony Note Added from OPEC Children's Book
  • 13 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 6 hours What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 7 hours "The Gasoline Car Is a Car With a Future"
  • 1 hour EU Confirms Trade Retaliation Measures vs. U.S. To Take Effect on June 22
  • 19 hours EVs Could Help Coal Demand
  • 7 hours Sell out now or hold on?
Alt Text

Russia Pushes Ahead With Controversial Nord Stream 2

Russia’s controversial Nord Stream 2…

Alt Text

The Permian Faces A Long Term Natural Gas Crisis

Bottlenecks in the Permian have…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Trending Discussions

Dow Opposes US Natural Gas Export Plans

Dow Chemical CO. (NYSE:DOW) is opposed to the idea of unlimited US natural gas exports, and this opposition has led it most recently to completely disown a $6.5 billion project for a Texas export terminal that it partly owns.

Earlier this week, Dow management publicly disavowed Texas-based Freeport LNG, which it partly owns with a limited partner status.

Dow vice president of energy and climate change George Biltz told Bloomberg: “Dow is not going to be part of the new investment. We have taken no role and haven’t worked with them at all” on the export proposal.”

The Freeport LNG export terminal is hoping for federal permission to cool 1.4 billion cubic feet of gas into liquid natural gas (LNG) daily. This LNG would be transported to overseas markets.

Related Article: Betting on Mediterranean Shale: 3 Plays, 1 Winner

Dow is opposed to this project because its senior management believes high volumes of LNG exports will lead to higher prices at home, which in turn would bode ill for the future construction of chemical plants and Dow’s overall bottom line.

Dow’s limited partnership status in the company has brought the conflict of interest to the forefront, not least because it owns a gas-important facility right next to it. Essentially, Freeport wants to expand this gas-import terminal into an expert facility, complete with the necessary refrigeration units and storage tanks. It needs $6.5 billion to do it—and Dow has made it clear that it will not invest a penny in the venture.

Dow rose 1 percent to $34.43 at the close in New York. The stock has increased 6.5 percent this year. Dow is worried that unlimited exports and sees its future in using the shale gas revolution to boost domestic projects—not exports.

In this battle, Dow also finds itself at odds with Exxon Mobil Corp., one of the most vocal proponents of unlimited US gas exports, the profits from which it insists will outpace any potential prices increases at home.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Gordon Steingart on January 28 2013 said:
    I will side with Exxon on this one. If Dow believes Natural gas being exported limits the progress of industrial expansion domestically ,then they should read up on nuclear power. That's the domestic solution,not fossil fuels .

    Dow Chemicals is trapped in a time warp.
  • Fact vs Fiction on January 31 2013 said:
    Where has Dow actually said they had actually "completely disown" their 15% stake in the $6.5 billion project? Did they sell it? Divest it? They still have that stake and they WILL still profit.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News