• 2 hours API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 2 hours Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 3 hours EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 4 hours IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 5 hours Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 6 hours Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 7 hours Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 8 hours Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 15 hours WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 20 hours Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 24 hours China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 1 day Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 1 day India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 1 day India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 1 day Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 2 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 2 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 2 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 2 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 2 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 2 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 2 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 2 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 5 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 5 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 5 days Kenya Cuts Share Of Oil Revenues To Local Communities
  • 5 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
  • 5 days Russia’s Lukoil May Sell 20% In Oil Trader Litasco
  • 5 days Falling Chinese Oil Imports Weigh On Prices
  • 5 days Shell Considers Buying Dutch Green Energy Supplier
  • 6 days Wind And Solar Prices Continue To Fall
  • 6 days Residents Flee After Nigeria Gas Company Pipeline Explodes
  • 6 days Venezuela To Pre-Mine Petro For Release In 6-Weeks
  • 6 days Trump Says U.S. “Could Conceivably” Rejoin Paris Climate Accord
  • 6 days Saudis Shortlist New York, London, Hong Kong For Aramco IPO
  • 6 days Rigid EU Rules Makes ICE Move 245 Oil Futures Contracts To U.S.
  • 6 days Norway Reports Record Gas Sales To Europe In 2017
  • 7 days Trump’s Plan Makes 65 Billion BOE Available For Drilling
  • 7 days PetroChina’s Biggest Refinery Doubles Russian Pipeline Oil Intake
  • 7 days NYC Sues Five Oil Majors For Contributing To Climate Change
Alt Text

The Most Remarkable Natural Gas Deal Of 2018

The potential first delivery of…

Alt Text

Romania Poised To Ramp Up Gas Output

Often overlooked, Romania has huge…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Did BP Just Unlock A New Major Shale Gas Basin?

Natural Gas

BP made a potentially groundbreaking discovery in New Mexico, which could open up a new area for shale gas development.

BP was drilling in a little-known area in northern New Mexico, in a place called the Mancos Shale. The British oil giant reported huge figures from the shale gas well, suggesting the Mancos could provide a massive new source of U.S. shale gas.

The initial 30-day production rates of the new well hit 12.9 million cubic feet of gas per day, a figure that tops horizontal wells in the highly prolific Eagle Ford shale, which often see wells producing 8 to 12 million cubic feet per day. And the production figures are the highest in 14 years within the San Juan Basin, which encompasses southwest Colorado and northeast New Mexico, and includes the Mancos Shale.

“We are delighted with the initial production rate of this well,” said Dave Lawler, CEO of BP’s U.S. Lower 48 onshore business. “This result supports our strategic view that significant resource potential exists in the San Juan Basin, and gives us confidence to pursue additional development of the Mancos Shale, which we believe could become one of the leading shale plays in the U.S.” BP plans on relocating its U.S. headquarters to Denver, a sign of how important the British oil company views the Rocky Mountain region.

A USGS report from 2016 estimates that the Mancos Shale holes 66.3 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, enough to rank the Mancos as the second largest shale play in the country, just behind the Marcellus. Related: China Outpaces Competition In Renewable Race

The impressive results come from acreage that BP acquired two years ago, in an area that at the time had no natural gas rigs in operation.

But there still plenty of hurdles for BP and any other company hoping to turn the Mancos into a major source of shale gas. First, they need to prove that the BP well was not simply a fluke. "The next test now will be showing some repeatability," said Linda Htein, senior research manager of Wood Mac's upstream research team, according to the Houston Chronicle. "Will they be able to repeat these results in another five wells? They think there's potential for scalability here."

Also, costs need to come down. David Deckelbaum, an energy analyst at Keybanc Capital Markets, told Bloomberg that the geology in the Mancos is much more complex than some more well-known shale plays. Drillers need to go deeper and drill through difficult rock formations. That means that it can cost as high as $13 to $15 million per well in the Mancos, about twice as much as typically seen in the Marcellus at $5.5 to $7 million, while the white-hot Permian Basin sees costs on the order of $8 to $10 million per well.

However, drilling in new areas is always tricky at first. Costs are high because companies are starting from scratch, learning the area, trying to figure out where the best spots to drill are. There is also a lack of infrastructure in the beginning, which keeps costs high and slows the ability to ramp up because of an inability to ship product. These things get worked out in time – costs tend to fall the more drilling activity scales up.

Related: Daily OPEC Oil Prices Now Public For The First Time Ever

But the Mancos will still struggle to compete with more well-established shale gas basins. Why drill in the Mancos instead of the massively prolific and relatively cheap Marcellus Shale? Or why not drill in the Permian, where you can produce oil as well as gas? Plus, those plays have pipelines and processing facilities that make it easy to offload what a company produces.

But the gusher from BP suggests that investing in this new area could be worth the trouble.

“Given the very strong initial production rates of this well, we believe there is potential for the Mancos Shale to be a large gas play,” BP spokesman Brett Clanton told the Denver Post. “It’s still early, but based on this initial success, we will be drilling more wells in the Mancos this year.”

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Scott on August 08 2017 said:
    I think it is very hard to predict future oil demands, but unfortunately governments are pushing electrification, which over time might dampen oil demand. However, a lowerprice response could make oil an excellent commodity versus batteries made with rising lithium costs built in to battery costs.

    The race is not over.
  • Frank on August 10 2017 said:
    Pretty sure this new major shale play has been experiencing horizontal development for almost a decade. Also the San Juan basin has had something like 40,000 wells drilled in it and at times has supplied as much as 20+% of the country's NG. I don't think infrastructure should be a big issue. Definitely not an unknown to anyone in the oil and gas industry.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News