• 2 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 5 minutes The Inconvenient Truth Of Electric Cars
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 1 hour Here we go folks, the wish of so many: Pres. Trump threatens to lessen US security role in Strait of Hormuz, unveils sanctions
  • 3 hours Climate change & Wildfires: More Wildfires To The Western U.S., Will Affect Tens Of Millions Of People
  • 17 mins Wonders of Shale - Gas, bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 17 mins Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 7 hours Hard To Believe: UAE Will Work To Defuse Middle East Tension
  • 1 hour The Plastics Problem
  • 3 hours Looks like Trump is putting together a "Real" Coalition to protect Persian shipping lanes. Makes perfect sense. NO Fake "Coalition's of the Willing" UPDATE REUTERS Pompeo "Sentinel Program"
  • 5 hours Cherry Picking Climate Data
  • 15 hours Solar Panels at 26 cents per watt
  • 8 hours Oil Demand Needs to Halve: Equinor
  • 8 hours Green vs. Coal: Bavaria Seeks Fast-Track German Coal Exit in Snub to Merkel Plan
  • 52 mins Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 14 hours Huge UK Gas Discovery
Alt Text

Russia Pushes Back Against “Freedom Gas”

The global gas market has…

Alt Text

The LNG Shipping Market Is Set For A Bull Run

In contrast to the volatile…

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel Graeber is a writer and political analyst based in Michigan. His work on matters related to the geopolitical aspects of the global energy sector,…

More Info

Premium Content

Clinton Thinks Azeri Gas is Important and so Should You

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said U.S. energy policies extend beyond high-profile issues like the Keystone XL pipeline and retail gasoline prices. The State Department, she said, conducts a "great deal" of energy-related diplomacy when specific needs arise. In states like Iran, statecraft is needed to prevent the country from using oil and gas revenue to fund a controversial nuclear program. In Libya, diplomacy was needed to ensure oil market stability during last year's civil war. For countries in the European Union, meanwhile, ensuring energy security is a matter of international and U.S. national concern.

Clinton told students at Georgetown University in Washington D.C. that energy issues cut across the entire spectrum of U.S. foreign policy.

"It’s a matter of national security and global stability. It’s at the heart of the global economy," she said. "It’s also an issue of democracy and human rights."

Energy policy, she said, is at the "core" of geopolitical manoeuvring. Nation's rich in oil and natural gas reserves may be more powerful than others, meaning energy is also a source of conflict and cooperation.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, staving off criticism of monopolizing power in the Kremlin, met recently with BP's Chief Executive Officer Bob Dudley to review the status of joint venture TNK-BP. Dudley was run out of his Moscow offices in 2008 when, as chief of TNK-BP, he was accused of favoring British interests. If BP shareholders approve of a sale of its half of the troubled venture to Rosneft, the Russian oil company may become one of the biggest in the world.

Related Article: Baghdad is Losing Iraqi Kurdistan - Empowered by Oil and Gas

Europe, meanwhile, is eager to break the Russian grip on the regional energy sector. Most of the Russian natural gas bound for European markets runs through Soviet-era pipelines in Ukraine. A troubled relationship between Kiev and the Kremlin has left downstream consumers in the Eurozone in the cold on more than one occasion.

Clinton said her focus on energy diplomacy was aimed at promoting competition and preventing monopolies in Europe. For many decades, the secretary said, the European community got most of its gas from Russian energy company Gazprom. With more gas reserves on hand in the United States, however, there are more alternatives on the global market, namely from Azerbiajan.

"They’d like to sell it, and Europe would like to buy it," she said. "But first, they need to build pipelines."

European leaders are pushing for a network of projects dubbed the Southern Corridor, a series of pipelines that includes the much-debated Nabucco pipeline. By tapping into Azeri reserves in the Caspian Sea, troubled economies in the European Union would no longer be vulnerable to the risky take-or-pay pricing schemes of Gazprom.

Clinton said that breaking up energy monopolies leads to stronger economies.  When one nation relies too much on another for energy, it's at risk of being controlled by that nation. That, in turn, leads to national security threats, something NATO recognized when it placed a priority on energy security. With issues like energy, the secretary said, everything's on the table.

"It’s not just a matter of economic competition, as important as that is," she said. "It’s also a matter of national and international security."

By. Daniel J. Graeber of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • David B. Benson on October 21 2012 said:
    Helpful.

    Thank you.
  • Philip on October 22 2012 said:
    Well if Clinton thinks Azeri gas so important she should leave Iran alone.

    Indications are that if the US and/or Israel attacks Iran, this will probably affect power supplies to Armenia. If Armenia is left without power, then Russia may well intervene by driving straight through Georgia to come to Armenias aid. If this happens she will take control of Georgia and of the gas and oil flowing from Azerbaijan through Georgia.

    Interesting scenario...?
  • Bob on October 22 2012 said:
    It's amazing how often the Western press loves to bash Russia and Gazprom, citing re-cycled old stories of price disputes between Ukraine and Russia, which are altogether moot now that Russia's new pipeline bipasses Urkraine entirely. As for take or pay contracts, Russia has been forced by Europe's recession to drop such contracts, has even gone away from gas price linkage to Brent oil. As for building expensive new pipelines for Azeri gas, the truth is no is offering to finance that, with Russia's second Southern pipeline to Europe in process and expected to be finished in 2013. As for rooting for Azeri energy to Europe, a lot depends on where your money is invested. Lots of portfolios hold Gazprom, including Mitt's and Ryan. Are they now also expected to root for Azeri nationalized energy, that no one can invest in? I think it would be good if the US kept its nose out of European problems, which the Europeans are very capable of handling on their own.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News