• 5 minutes Covid-19 logarithmic growth
  • 8 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 12 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 14 minutes China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 4 hours Cpt Lauren Dowsett
  • 2 hours Which producers will shut in first?
  • 11 mins What If ‘We’d Adopted A More Conventional Response To This Epidemic?’
  • 25 mins Marine based energy generation
  • 11 hours The Most Annoying Person You Have Encountered During Lockdown
  • 13 hours Pumping Dollar V Pumping Oil Match
  • 4 hours Its going to be an oil bloodbath
  • 5 hours Trump will meet with executives in the energy industry to discuss the impact of COVID-19
  • 4 hours The idea that electric cars are lowering demand is ridiculous.
  • 5 hours Russia's Rosneft Oil Company announces termination of its activity in Venezuela
  • 9 hours How to Create a Pandemic
  • 10 hours Natural gas price to spike when USA is out of the market
  • 10 hours Iran-Turkey gas pipeline goes kaboom. Bad people blamed.
  • 21 hours CDC covid19 coverup?

Breaking News:

IEA: OPEC Can’t Save The Oil Market

Alt Text

Why Civil Rights Activists Are Backing Natural Gas

Top American civil rights activists…

Alt Text

Giant LNG Projects Face Coronavirus Death Or Delay

The coronavirus crisis is now…

Energy Digital

Energy Digital

Energy Digital is a leading digital media source of news and content for C-level executives focused on business and all aspects of managing the environment.…

More Info

Premium Content

Chesapeake Energy to Invest $1 Billion in Natural Gas Cars

Natural gas is gaining ground as oil prices still linger around $100 a barrel; however, there are limited vehicles on the road that can run off of natural gas, and fueling infrastructure is certainly lacking.  That is changing as countries like the U.S. diversify their transportation sectors to offer alternative fuel options, such as biofuels, hydrogen, electric and natural gas.  Chesapeake Energy—the second largest producer of natural gas in the United States—is looking to fast-track development of natural gas vehicle fueling infrastructure, and is willing to invest $1 billion over the next 10 years to do so.

Switching from gasoline to natural gas, the company says, will lower energy costs to consumers, enhance national security, stimulate economic growth, create hundreds of thousands of jobs, improve the environment, and “help break OPEC's 38-year stranglehold on the U.S. economy.”

"We have analyzed the U.S. transportation sector during the past four years to determine how to create the best pathway to move our country away from dependence on OPEC oil and the resulting yearly transfer of more than $400 billion of American wealth to foreign countries, many of them often unfriendly to U.S. interests,” said Aubrey K. McClendon, Chesapeake's Chief Executive Officer.

“As a result of our analysis, Chesapeake has developed a three-pronged plan to move America toward greater energy independence and enhanced national security during the next 10 years.”

Chesapeake plans to increase onshore production, currently at around eight million barrels a day, by three to four million using horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing techniques.  The company plans to invest in both compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas fueling stations to give carmakers more incentive to develop natural gas vehicles of all sizes, makes and models.  Chesapeake claims that once their plan goes into effect, natural gas fueling could be $1.50 to $2.00 per gallon cheaper than gasoline and diesel.

The company also plans to deploy a gas-to-liquids process that will convert natural gas into a room temperature fuel that can be blended with existing gasoline supplies to meet the demand of drivers who do not yet own a natural gas vehicle.

By. John Shimkus of Energy Digital


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage






Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on July 15 2011 said:
    Natural gas has much to recommend it as fuel for vehicles powered by Otto-cycle engines (which is true for most of us). It has good antiknock properties, is clean-burning, and at this time offers more energy per dollar than gasoline. Hydrogen has a cache among intellectuals. The most important advantage of hydrogen as I see it, is that fuel cells can use it more easily than anything else. Unfortunately the only practical source of hydrogen right now is from natural gas. So before we spend huge sums of money to develop a hydrogen infrastructure, we need to ask: What is more efficient in terms of "well to wheels" utilization of natural gas? Should we use NG "as is" in vehicles like what we now have, or process it into hydrogen for fuel cell powered vehicles?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News