• 1 hour Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 3 hours Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 5 hours OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 8 hours Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 9 hours Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 10 hours Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 1 day API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 1 day Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 1 day EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 1 day IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 1 day Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 1 day Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 1 day Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 1 day Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 2 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 2 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 2 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 2 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 2 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 2 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 2 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 3 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 3 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 3 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 3 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 3 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 3 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 3 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 3 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 6 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 6 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 6 days Kenya Cuts Share Of Oil Revenues To Local Communities
  • 6 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
  • 6 days Russia’s Lukoil May Sell 20% In Oil Trader Litasco
  • 6 days Falling Chinese Oil Imports Weigh On Prices
  • 6 days Shell Considers Buying Dutch Green Energy Supplier
  • 7 days Wind And Solar Prices Continue To Fall
  • 7 days Residents Flee After Nigeria Gas Company Pipeline Explodes
  • 7 days Venezuela To Pre-Mine Petro For Release In 6-Weeks
  • 7 days Trump Says U.S. “Could Conceivably” Rejoin Paris Climate Accord
Alt Text

Will 1 Billion EVs Crash Gasoline Demand?

Electric vehicle sales are picking…

Alt Text

Oil-Rich Venezuela Is Out Of Gasoline

Iván Freites, a secretary of…

Alt Text

Gas Wars: The First Energy Conflict In 2018

Territorial disputes over newly discovered…

Rising Gas Prices and Political Scapegoats

Rising Gas Prices and Political Scapegoats

Summer is approaching, and that typically means rising gas prices. And when gas prices rise, our political leaders generally start looking around for someone to blame. Over the past few years it has become a regular ritual that as gas prices rise, the CEOs of our biggest oil companies will be marched to Washington D.C. for a public shaming that involves Congress grilling them on why they are doing such horrible things to the American public.

Inevitably, we will spend tax dollars investigating the matter. And as was the case after Hurricane Katrina, one FTC investigation after another has found no conspiracy to fix prices; that supply and demand are in fact the primary reasons that gas prices rise and fall. But while the investigations are always launched with press conferences, the exonerations don’t involve the same sort of fanfare, and the public is left with the impression that someone is taking advantage of them. Of course when record oil company profits come on the heels of record gas prices, it is easy to understand why people feel that way.

I was asked during a recent radio interview who is responsible for high gas prices. While that is a complex answer with many factors contributing, mostly consumers of oil-based products are responsible. If you drive a car that is made from numerous plastics and consumes diesel or gasoline, then you are partially responsible for high gas prices. After all, there are a whole lot of people just like you, and we enjoy the conveniences that oil has brought us. But that convenience has made us very dependent, and other countries want those same conveniences. Growing demand of a depleting resource is a prescription for higher prices.

The 2011 Dog and Pony Show

But, unsatisfied that we could possibly be the ones to blame, our politicians take the easy way out and launch investigations. And now President Obama, responding to pressure that he isn’t doing enough to combat high gas prices, has launched a new one:

LOS ANGELES (KABC) — President Barack Obama has ordered the Justice Department to investigate potential price gouging at the pump.

Attorney General Eric Holder will appoint a task force to examine both gasoline sales and potential manipulation in oil markets.

“Based upon our work and research to date, it is evident that there are regional differences in gasoline prices, as well as differences in the statutory and other legal tools at the government’s disposal,” Holder said in a memo accompanying a statement announcing the task force.

I can save them some time and explain why there are regional differences in gasoline prices. I have seen it many times firsthand. Neighboring regions often have different requirements for their gasoline. This can mean that a shortage in one area can’t be easily alleviated by shipping in gasoline from another area. Further, sometimes there are no pipelines to easily get fuel from one area into another. I experienced this when I worked in a refinery in Montana. Gasoline prices at one time were very high in Utah, but we had no easy way to get fuel into that market. We also sometimes saw very low oil prices in North Dakota, but once more no easy way to get that oil into our refinery due to lack of pipelines.

President Obama went on to admit that it’s all a dog and pony show:

Neither the president nor Holder have offered any evidence of actual fraud, and both admit there are legal, logical reasons for the rising price of gas. But Obama says he wants to make sure that no one uses the current market as an opportunity for criminal activity.

So, no evidence of fraud, and logical reasons for the price increase. Then let’s waste taxpayer money by launching an investigation. Maybe we will find a small group of speculators this time pulling the strings. While we are at it, I can think of a few more things we should investigate.

Additional Investigations to Consider

Standard & Poor’s lowered the outlook on its triple-A rating of U.S. debt from stable to negative. The U.S. dollar has been incredibly weak against most major foreign currencies. This has been cited as one of the biggest factors behind increased oil prices. Shouldn’t we launch an investigation to determine who is responsible for the debasing of our currency?

Corn prices have doubled over the past year. Corn farmers in Iowa are celebrating Christmas in April. Doesn’t this mean they are taking advantage of us? Given the importance of corn in the food supply, shouldn’t we launch an investigation into this gouging? Or shall we nominate Donald Trump to tell corn farmers to lower prices?

Easter candy was marked half off the day after Easter. Doesn’t that mean I was being gouged and taken advantage of prior to Easter? This warrants an investigation into the pricing policies of Cadbury’s, as well as the retail outlets who sell it. I demand cheap chocolate, and I see no reason why I should have to pay more for it before Easter.


It seems that this political merry-go-round of investigations is part of the very fabric of our lives. Gas prices go up, and politicians start looking for scapegoats. It can’t possibly be the policies they have passed, nor can it be the world’s insatiable demand for oil. Someone, somewhere must be pulling the strings and taking advantage of people.

There are many factors behind the increase in gas prices, and one of them is in fact speculation. But we place far too much emphasis on this speculation bogeyman. Speculation goes on in all commodity and stock markets. Corn prices are up partially because of speculation. The price of metal is driven up by speculators. All of these things impact consumers. But speculation works in both directions, which is why oil fell so sharply from $147 in mid-2008 to the $30’s by the end of 2008 (and why stock price bubbles lead to stock price crashes).

The single-biggest factor behind the price rise, though, is simply growing demand for oil. Donald Trump can pontificate about there being so much oil that they don’t know where to dump it, but he simply doesn’t know what he is talking about. There is very little spare capacity in the world, and demand is growing. A more productive investigation would be to figure out how to increase supplies and curb demand. But that of course would require a bit more effort on the part of our political leaders.

By. Robert Rapier

Source: R Squared Energy Blog

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on April 26 2011 said:
    It cannot be emphasized enough how contradictory it is that the same politicos who wage an ever more intense campaign of regulatory aggression against the auto industry, demanding 27-1/2, then 35, and possibly in the future 45 or even 60+ miles per gallon CAFE, are the same ones who cry in their coffee (or whatever they drink) about high gas prices. Recently we have heard in the news that demand for hybrid-electric or other fuel-efficient vehicles is rising. Let's face it: This is not happening because of jawboning about global warming. Its happening because of free-market incentives.
  • Anonymous on April 27 2011 said:
    No, no. You've got the 2008 story wrong. The oil price fell because an oil price of $147/b cut the ground out from under the macroeconomy, and demand collapsed. When smart people in the financial institutions saw what was happening, they went short, which helped to push the price down faster and lower. But OPEC had a remedy for that: reduced supply.What will happen now? Well, dumb Sarkozy and dumb Cameraon and pretentious Obama can take some advice from the Pope, and think in terms of "diplomacy" and "discourse" instead of the stupidity they have practiced during the last few months. If they and the completely ignorant NATO boss Fogh Rasmussen want to protect civilians, they can protect civilians in their own countries. For the US this includes young American children who are going to school hungry, and who are living in automobiles.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News