• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 3 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 7 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 9 days By Kellen McGovern Jones - "BlackRock Behind New TX-LA Offshore Wind Farm"
  • 5 days Solid State Lithium Battery Bank
  • 9 hours If hydrogen is the answer, you're asking the wrong question
  • 4 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
Robert Rapier

Robert Rapier

More Info

Premium Content

Will the World See a “Staggering” Oil Supply Glut in 2030?

  • The IEA predicts a future oil supply glut due to electric vehicles and rising non-OPEC+ production.
  • Past predictions of oil decline have been inaccurate, such as Bloomberg's forecast of a crash in 2023.
  • The IEA's current prediction relies on assumptions that may not hold true.
Oil

The International Energy Agency (IEA) recently released its Oil 2024 report, which examines the global dynamics for oil supply security, refining, trade, and investment. The report received considerable media attention because of the projection that by 2030 oil production will reach “a staggering 8 million barrels per day above projected global demand.”

The report cites the proliferation of electric vehicles, the growing utilization of renewable energy, and China’s declining oil consumption growth are key contributors to this projected trend. However, the IEA still expects oil demand to grow. From a global base of 103.2 million barrels per day (BPD) in 2024, the IEA believes demand will grow to 105.6 million BPD by 2029 and decrease slightly to 105.5 million BPD in 2030 (Table 2 in the report).

Supply growth is expected to be largely driven by non-OPEC+ countries, particularly the United States, Brazil, Guyana, and Canada, which are projected to pump at record levels. Non-OPEC+ countries are predicted to add 6 million BPD of supply by 2030.

In contrast, OPEC+ output is expected to remain relatively steady, with voluntary production cuts being a significant factor in maintaining market stability. The imbalance is projected to have far-reaching implications for geopolitics and may diminish OPEC’s capacity to influence oil prices.

The IEA makes its supply projections in part by looking at announced projects. However, to project a supply excess, the IEA also must make assumptions regarding depletion in existing fields, future discoveries, and demand trends.

In 2016, Bloomberg made a similar prediction in Another Oil Crash Is Coming, and There May Be No Recovery. The article looked at trends of electric vehicle sales, and wrote “If that level of growth continues, the crash-triggering benchmark of 2 million barrels of reduced demand could come as early as 2023.” I took exception to the assumptions that were made in the Bloomberg article and concluded:

“Thus, don’t be surprised in 2023 to see that instead of crude oil demand being 2 million bpd lower than today per the Bloomberg article, we see that oil demand grew despite the continued growth of electric vehicles.”

That is in fact what happened. Global oil demand in 2023 was around 5 million BPD higher than it was in 2016 when Bloomberg made the prediction, and as we know oil prices in 2023 certainly didn’t signal an oversupply.

But consider what might have happened if the markets took the Bloomberg projections at face value. If investments in oil projects had dried up because of the predicted supply excess, instead of oil prices averaging $78 per barrel in 2023, they might have averaged $130-$150 as supply fell short of demand. Volatile prices can be a consequence of wrong projections.

The bottom line is that it is hard to make these projections, as Bloomberg learned. For that matter, if you had predicted in 2005 that U.S. oil production would grow at the fastest rate of any country over the next decade, energy analysts everywhere would have laughed. But that’s exactly what happened.

I don’t know if the IEA projection will prove to be accurate. I do know that over the past 10 months, U.S. oil production — although still near record levels — has flattened. Most of the best tight oil sites in the U.S. have been drilled. U.S. oil production may be reaching a plateau, while the IEA is projecting another 2 million BPD of growth in the U.S. by 2030.

There are many assumptions behind the IEA’s projection. All it takes is for one or two of those assumptions to be wrong, and the IEA’s projections of a “staggering” excess could be staggeringly wrong.

By Robert Rapier via rrapier.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mike on June 19 2024 said:
    Would you buy an electric vehicle for your teenager?

    All of this could have been avoided with hybrids and a 50% reduction in emissions right.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on June 19 2024 said:
    My answer is an emphatic NO. The reason is that the IEA's projection is based on two flawed assumptions.

    1- The first is that rising numbers of EVs will lead to a steep decline in global oil demand causing oil demand to peak by 2030. This has been discredited by OPEC+ the most astute reader of the global oil market and its trends forecasting a growth in oil demand to 110.0 million barrels a day (mbd) in 2028 and hitting 116.0 mbd by 2045. Another disputing factor is that despite an expenditure of more than $10 trillions on EVs during the last 10 years, daily media promotion and very fat government subsidies, there are only 20 million EVs compared with 1.4 billion ICEs according to American auto research.

    2- The second is that US oil production will rise by 2.0 mbd by 2030. Current US production is estimated at less than 8.0 mbd once 5.2 mbd of condensate and national gas liquids (NGLs) are deducted from the total. Moreover, shale oil production is already flattening. The proof is that the US is importing an estimated 8.0 mbd . Furthermore, shale oil has been unable to contribute to the refilling of the SPR.

    My verdict is that any projections by the IEA are dud and therefore should be totally ignored exactly as OPEC+ stopped five years ago using its energy data as politicized, shallow and flawed.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News