• 3 hours UK On Track To Approve Construction of “Mini” Nuclear Reactors
  • 7 hours LNG Glut To Continue Into 2020s, IEA Says
  • 9 hours Oil Nears $52 With Record OPEC Deal Compliance
  • 12 hours Saudi Aramco CEO Affirms IPO On Track For H2 2018
  • 14 hours Canadia Ltd. Returns To Sudan For First Time Since Oil Price Crash
  • 15 hours Syrian Rebel Group Takes Over Oil Field From IS
  • 3 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 3 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 3 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 3 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 3 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 3 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 4 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 4 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 4 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 4 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 4 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 4 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 4 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 4 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 4 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 5 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 5 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 5 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 5 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 5 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 5 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 6 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 6 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 6 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 6 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 6 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 6 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 6 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 7 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 7 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 7 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 7 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
Alt Text

With A World Awash In Oil, Kazakhstan Faces Fuel Crisis

Kazakhstan is struggling with a…

Alt Text

OPEC Seeks Help From U.S. Shale

OPEC’s secretary general has asked…

Alt Text

Global Oil Supply Disruptions Lowest Since 2012

Unplanned disruptions in global oil…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Will Trump Send Electricity Bills Soaring?

Donald Trump

After the election of Donald Trump as President, one of the cornerstones of the modern global economic system is being questioned. Trump built his campaign on questioning the status quo, and in economics that has largely meant deriding free trade. This could impact an under-the-radar area of trade between the U.S. and Canada – wholesale electricity.

Electricity trading is a new area of opportunity for trade among the NAFTA members, and it’s an area that has been growing rapidly. For instance, in resource and waterway rich Canada, hydroelectric power is abundant and cheap. Electricity harnessed from dams and reservoirs in Quebec, Manitoba, and British Columbia accounted for 63 percent of Canada’s overall electric supply in 2015.

While the U.S. and Canada have been trading electricity for more than a century - since well before NAFTA – free trade between the countries has contributed to greater levels of trade. In 2014 for instance, Canada exported 45.6 Terawatt hours of electricity to the U.S. In 2015 that number rose to 59.7 Terwatt hours.

That electricity was worth roughly $2.1 billion.

Those electricity imports helped to stave off potential blackouts as electricity production in the Pacific Norwest suffered due to a drought reducing output from hydropower in Washington, Oregon, and California.

Related: Asian Crude Markets On Edge As OPEC Meets

In New England, where power prices are extremely high compared to national averages, Canadian exports would help cut costs for consumers. Canadian exporters are attempting to tap this market through six new transmission line projects that are in various stages of planning and construction.

It’s unclear if all of the projects will go through because of local opposition to power lines and a preference by some area residents for other sources of power. Still, with retail rates in some areas of New England as high as $0.26 per kwh, it is clear this is an opportunity.

Energy exports from Canada could be either clean exports like hydropower or conventional like shale oil.

Both types have value in different areas, just as U.S. exports to Canada do.

Indeed, because of the difficulty of transmitting electricity or moving oil, it’s entirely possible that Canada could export to the U.S. while the U.S. exports the exact same good to Canada as well. U.S. oil and natural gas production from Pennsylvania could help power Ontario and Quebec for instance, even as Canadian shale flowed through pipelines from Alberta to the U.S. Infrastructure matters a lot in these settings, especially given the difficulties most companies are facing in building new pipelines (Exhibit A: see the Dakota Access Pipeline).

Related: This Oil Major Just Circumvented Sanctions On Iran

Only time will tell how changes in free trade impact the U.S.-Canada energy markets or the nascent market for Mexican oil. Still, it is clear that companies looking to capitalize on trade probably face an uphill political battle compared to the environment a year ago.

The irony of President Trump’s position is that economists from both sides of the aisle almost universally agree that free trade is good.

There are actually more Republican economists than Democratic economists according to industry surveys, yet President Trump is ignoring that wing of the party.

Despite the economic reality that free trade is an overall positive for the country as a whole, there are several weaknesses which make it vulnerable as a political point.

First, trade is not positive for every single individual in a country, and second, trade may have short term negative consequences. These points are what has undermined the free trade argument for many Americans and are what is jeopardizing U.S.-Canadian electricity trading.

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Oilracle on November 30 2016 said:
    --"Only time will tell how changes in free trade...."--

    What is "free trade?" As of today it means America looses and lives from swelling National Debt.

    Try to buy all these imports without borrowed and printed money...
  • Joe on November 30 2016 said:
    Although President Trump feels that America needs to revamp trade relationships with its trading partners, I think this pertains mostly to countries that have ultra low wage structures that are sapping American jobs. Canada on the other hand, has a wage structure that is quite similar to the USA. There is no significant risk of losing jobs to Canada. Canada has always been a good trade partner, supplying oil, natural gas and electrical power when America needs it. Canada can be relied upon to displace the entirety of Saudi Oil imports if President Trump wishes. Another thing. When America was fighting terrorism in Afghanistan, Canadian soldiers were fighting side by side with American solders.
    Who would want to damage a relationship like that?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News