• 4 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 6 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 8 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 9 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 10 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 11 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 12 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 14 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 15 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 17 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 23 hours Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 1 day British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 1 day Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 1 day Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 1 day Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 1 day OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 3 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 3 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 3 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 3 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 4 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 4 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Kobe Steel Scandal Could Rattle Nuclear Industry

The scandal at Japan’s Kobe…

Alt Text

Corbyn Seeks To Renationalize Britain’s Utilities

Jeremy Corbyn wants to renationalize…

Alt Text

What’s Stopping An Oil Price Rally?

Oil prices rallied in Q3…

Fabius Maximus

Fabius Maximus

Fabius Maximus discusses geopolitics – broadly defined as economics, government, sociology and the military arts – from an American’s perspective.  This includes topics such as…

More Info

Why Renewable Energy Will Not be Saving us Any Time Soon

Why Renewable Energy Will Not be Saving us Any Time Soon

Summary:  Optimists about energy give glowing forecasts of new technologies, often with wildly underestimated estimates of when when these can generate substantial fractions of our energy.  In the real world technologies take decades to evolve from the laboratory to commercialization. And then building new energy sources on a large scale takes decades. 
Here we sketch out realistic timelines.


1. Time, often the missing element from analysis about the energy problem
2. The path from lab to megawatts
3. Where are the hot new energy sources it the R&D development process?
4. How long will it take to scale up successful new energy sources?
5. So when should we get started?

(1) Time, often the missing element from analysis about the energy problem

There are two common errors about time when discussing new energy sources.  First, exaggerating how quickly new technology develops from lab to commercialization.  That’s the subject of this post.  But optimists often make a more fundamental error.

“Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if, in tempestuous seasons, they can only tell us that when the storm is long past the ocean is flat again.”
— John Maynard Keynes in A Tract on Monetary Reform (1923)

Much of the cornucopians’ optimism comes from confidence that eventually new energy sources will be found.  I agree.  Future generations will use energy sources beyond anything in our science fiction.  But that probably will not help us or our children.  Our prosperity almost certainly depends on what we do.  Trusting to the invisible hand (an exaggeration of what Adam Smith said) means that either we’re lucky — or our children might be poorer than us.

More specifically, the energy sources we will rely on in the next 25 (probably even 50 years) have already been discovered.

(2) The path from lab to megawatts

1. Laboratory:  testing proof of concept.

2. Pilot Plant: A larger unit built to generate information. Such as about the optimal engineering design, impact of operating parameters on process efficiency and product quality, qualification of input requirements, development of safe operating procedures, and estimates of capital and operating costs.
3. Demonstration plant:  A larger scale plant that generates significant quantities of product, testing decisions made at the pilot level.
4. Production and commercialization.

There are no agreed-upon definitions for each of these stages.

Update:  Just because something has been proven to work does not mean it is profitable in its current form.  Such as coal-to-liquids (converting coal into liquid fuel).  It was used as a desperate expedient by the NAZI’s and South African apartaid regimes, but even with improved technology it remains of uncertain profitability today (see yesterday’s post for details).

(3) Where are some hot new energy sources in the R&D development process?

Enthusiasts often exaggerate when cheering their favorite technology’s state of development.  Here’s a quick review of some energy tech:

• The various fusion programs such as the polywell, the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) are all at the laboratory stage

• Cellusosic ethanol:  from laboratory to demonstration plant (see the Range Fuels fiasco, Ineos Bio pilot plant, SuGanit Systems pilot plant, Woodland Biofuels demonstration plant, Genera Energy demonstration plant).

• Mining and refining oil sands (bitumen):  large scale commercial plants running using surface-mining; underground mining in the pilot and demonstration plant stages (see this list).  Most of the deposits are deep underground.

• Coal to liquids:  plants are running in the pilot, demonstration, and production stages.  Cost-effective new plants are in the pilot and demonstration stages.

New tech, especially break-through technology, usually takes decades to evolve from the lab bench to commercial use.

(4) How long will it take to scale up successful new energy sources

Politicians often speak of energy independence for America.  Unfortunately it’s an absurd dream, except perhaps over several generations.  The US imports roughly ten million barrels of oil per day.  Nothing will replace imports during the next 10 years, and probably during the next 20 years.  There are no fast solutions.

Considered the microwave oven (from Wikipedia):

• 1934 – first patent on the technology roughly
• 1945 – a discovery of the heating effect of microwaves at Raytheon
• 1947 – Raytheon builds the the first commercial microwave oven. The Radarange was 6 feet tall, weighted 750 pounds, and cost $5,000 (the cost of a home).
• 1967 – the first microwave with large sales, costing $500  (average cost of a car was $2800)
• 1971 – aprox 1 percent of US homes have a microwave oven
• 1986 – aprox 1 in 4 US homes have a microwave over
• now — aprox 90% of US homes have one

Look at bitumen (oil sands) mining in Canada.  The first mine opened in 1967; the third in 2003.   By 2005 (aprox) Canada produced over one million barrels per day (MBD), and 1.4 mbd in 2009.  Their goal is 3.3 mbd by 2020 (down from a  20 mbd target a few years ago).  Perhaps 4.2 mbd by 2030.  But the next development is new technology  tap deeper deposits (in situ mining), and progress is slower than expected.

China planned to build plants converting coal to liquid fuels producing one million barrels/day by 2020, before putting most of the program on hold (see yesterday’s post for details).

And large projects require more time to build in the US.  A new mine in the US takes  7-10 years from initial application.  If needed to move the coal from mines to the CTL plant, a new railroad can require 5 or 10 years to build, depending on the location (people hate dirty, noisy coal trains running through their neighborhoods).

Of course, we could do crash programs.  Which have some serious side-effects.  Most important, accelerated programs drive up costs.  A lot, as companies operating in the Albert oil sands boom discovered.  WWII is not a useful comparison.  Not only was cost not a factor for the US (great news for the war contractors), but the Great Depression resulted in vast idle resources (both plant and people) that could be quickly mobilized.

For more about this see Could a new “Manhattan Project” produce radically new energy sources?, 29 June 2010

(5) So when should we get started?

“Knowledge is the great sun of the firmament,” said Senator Daniel Webster. “Life and power are scattered with all its beams.”
In its light, we must think and act not only for the moment but for our time. I am reminded of the story of the great French Marshal Lyautey, who once asked his gardener to plant a tree. The gardener objected that the tree was slow-growing and would not reach maturity for a hundred years. The Marshal replied, “In that case, there is no time to lose, plant it this afternoon.”
Today a world of knowledge — a world of cooperation – a just and lasting peace — may be years away. But we have no time to lose. Let us plant our trees this afternoon.

— President Kennedy, speech at U California at Berkeley, 23 March 1962

By. Fabius Maximus

This article was published with permission by: http://fabiusmaximus.wordpress.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News