X

Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!

ERROR

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

  • 3 minutes Texas forced to have rolling brown outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 7 minutes Scientists Warn That Filling The Sahara With Solar Panels Is A Bad Idea
  • 11 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 15 minutes Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 9 hours America Makes Plans to Produce Needed Rare Earth Minerals Domestically
  • 2 hours IS SAUDI ARABIA SENDING A MESSAGE TO BIDEN
  • 9 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 2 days Texas forced to have rolling black outs, primarily because of large declines in output from fossil fuel power plants
  • 2 days Former BP Exec "Biden not in war against oil" . . Really ?
  • 2 days Texas Supply Chain Massacre
  • 2 days Here we go - again: plug-in hybrids cost motorists more than what they were told
  • 5 hours Top Conservative Lawyer Says Trump Can Stand Trial
  • 6 hours “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 2 days An exciting development in EV Aviation: Volocopter
Brian Noble

Brian Noble

Brian Noble is principal with Financial Communications in Toronto, Canada which specializes in communications initiatives for the Canadian and global financial services industry. Brian Noble MA,…

More Info

Premium Content

Why Last Week’s Oil Price Crash Was Inevitable

For traders who were paying attention, the weekly COT (Commitments of Traders) reports from the CFTC (U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission) have recently been screaming out a warning…crude oil bear market ahead.

What the COT reports were showing was wildly bullish investor sentiment matched with equally extreme hedging activity as investors piled into the WTI crude oil futures contract. While bullish sentiment peaked as of the 10 February report, as recently as the beginning of March, hedge funds and other large speculative (that is non-commercial) players held near-record net long positions in WTI crude oil futures. Commercials are industry players who are largely hedgers and are usually considered smart money.

In fact, total net long positions were just over 525,000 contracts for the week ended February 28, 2017, as concurrently the U.S. rig count had increased to 609 and inventories had risen for an eighth week in a row to over 520 million barrels. The COT reports are complicated enough to make out even in short-form format (see Release Schedule), but the industry-focused media, including oilprice.com; usually publishes the key aggregated results for each major commodity, including WTI, on Saturday each week.

The Evidence was Mounting

What was the root cause of the record bullish positioning by so-called smart money players? We may never know precisely. It could have been that the big funds really did believe in the efficacy of the OPEC crude oil production deal and its potential extension into 2017. Alternatively, the funds may have thought that Trump-induced global growth would really put a bid under demand for crude. Or maybe the funds’ algorithms had been in sleep mode as the price of crude hadn’t really budged since the Trump election, stuck in a range of less than 6 percent between say US$51-54. Liquidation, however, began in earnest with the crude oil crash of last week, as net bullish contracts declined by almost 17,000 to 509,000 contracts for a 3.2 percent drop on a weekly basis as of the Friday 10 March reporting date. More liquidation is presumably on the way.

The big question is why the speculative COT position remained above levels last seen in 2014 when the crude price was almost double where it was pre the March crash?

It is clear that certain things were forgotten - if only temporarily. First, the nature of the market in which all this bullishness expressed itself. With futures contracts, there is no optionality. A seller is obliged to make delivery and a buyer is obliged to take delivery, unless the contract is rolled out into future months prior to expiry. That meant that there were going to be a lot of hedge funds obliged in the next short while covering their bullish bets by selling, rolling out or storing physical crude. This is called forced selling and it’s never pretty. On the storage front, U.S. capacity, while difficult to determine precisely, is widely considered once again to be almost topped up at around 540 million barrels. Related: Falling Oil Prices Could Upend The OPEC Deal

Secondly, the relative ease of finding a counterparty to fund bullishness. As was widely expected in the aftermath of the December OPEC cuts, higher crude prices encouraged producers to hedge their production forward, and in doing so hedge funds and other speculators were happy to take the other side of their trades. In addition, while the oil price has been fairly flat, oil equities have been underperforming. So with flat oil, lagging equities and off-the-charts COT participation, a bit of a witches brew had been bubbling just below the surface.

Third was the observable reduction in net longs from the middle of February to the end of the month (about a 6 percent drop). Nothing too exceptional perhaps, but a harbinger of things to come.

Last, the year-out contango (WTI term structure---comparable to the yield curve) was beginning to tell another story. While the contract was flirting with backwardation earlier in February, an increasing reversion to contango and a slight widening of the spreads across the entire crude futures complex, including Brent, were beginning to confirm a potentially bearish trend.

So let’s do the scorecard. In terms of what has been discussed here, I count one bullish factor (the OPEC cuts, which are still reality) and four clearly evident bearish factors (overbullishness, inevitable contract liquidation, storage constraints and return of the contango.) There are many other factors to consider, but the dramatic outcome in the crude oil market in the second week of March should perhaps have seemed more inevitable than the market gave it credit for at the time.

By Brian Noble for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Salcido on March 14 2017 said:
    What I have been saying all along, simple supply and demand. No matter how much OPEC agreement cuts others will produce to meet demand. Until there is a real shortage; meaning running low on earth's oil, which is not going to happen anywhere in the near future. Price will have to drop... back to the 20$ you go. OPEC is just used to not having competition and thinks it can manipulate prices and still turn a profit.
  • Spencer on March 15 2017 said:
    All administered price increases (esp. during the bottom in seasonal demand), are inevitably deflationary, unless validated by monetary policy (as I predicted in Sept).

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News