• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 days "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
  • 7 days America should go after China but it should be done in a wise way.
  • 15 hours Even Shell Agrees with Climate Change!
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 3 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
  • 2 days World could get rid of Putin and Russia but nobody is bold enough
  • 5 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing for news outlets such as iNVEZZ and SeeNews. 

More Info

Premium Content

TotalEnergies: Oil Majors' Exit From Russia Easier Said Than Done

  • Oil majors were quick to announce their withdrawal from Russia during the first days of the war in Ukraine.
  • TotalEnergies CEO Pouyanne said that there are a lot of practical complications in selling Russian energy assets.
  • TotalEnergies has drawn a lot of criticism for not announcing an immediate withdrawal from Russia.

Despite pledges from numerous international oil majors to leave Russia, this is easier said than done, and companies from the U.S. and the UK are still stuck with their Russian assets, Patrick Pouyanne, CEO at TotalEnergies, said on Wednesday.

In the days after the Russian invasion of Ukraine began, UK's BP and Shell said they would divest their Russian assets and stop trading with Russian oil.  

The war in Ukraine "has caused us to fundamentally rethink bp's position with Rosneft. I am convinced that the decisions we have taken as a board are not only the right thing to do, but are also in the long-term interests of bp," BP's chief executive Bernard Looney said just days after the invasion.  

U.S. supermajor ExxonMobil said it would discontinue operations at Sakhalin-1 and will make no new investments in Russia, deploring "Russia's military action."  

Only TotalEnergies has not announced an immediate withdrawal from Russia, drawing a lot of criticism from investors and campaigners.

"Everybody's telling me that my Anglo-Saxon competitors are leaving," TotalEnergies's CEO Pouyanne told France's RTL radio today. "None of my competitors has left Russia, and knows how to leave Russia," he added.

"Do you want me to abandon assets in Russia to enrich Russians whom we have placed under sanctions? I won't give in to it, because that's demagogy," said Pouyanne, as quoted by Bloomberg.

On Tuesday, TotalEnergies shared its view and steps it had taken regarding its business in Russia "after the serious and unfounded accusations of "complicity in war crimes" leveled against TotalEnergies."

Condemning the Russian invasion of Ukraine once again, the company said it would not provide further capital for the development of projects in Russia, and it would no longer enter into or renew contracts to purchase Russian oil and petroleum products, "in order to halt all its purchases of Russian oil and petroleum products as soon as possible and by the end of 2022 at the latest."

TotalEnergies said it does not operate any oil and gas fields or any liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants in Russia.

Moreover, the company said that "The current environment of European sanctions and Russian laws controlling foreign investments in Russia would prevent TotalEnergies to find a non-Russian buyer for its minority interests in Russia. Abandoning these interests without consideration would enrich Russian investors, in contradiction with the sanctions' purpose."  


By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on March 23 2022 said:
    The reason Western oil companies have been investing in Russia’s oil and gas projects is because they get a very good return on their investments given that the Russian Arctic has huge proven reserves of both oil and gas. However, divesting of their investments in the aftermath of the Ukraine conflict will be extremely difficult and very costly.

    BP was the first Western oil major to announce its decision to divest of almost 20% investment in Russia’s oil giant Rosneft. This is the most lucrative investment BP currently has. However, BP may not be able to sell its share in Rosneft to a non-Russian buyer which could mean that either Rosneft or the Russian government could buy BP’s share on the cheap. This could cost BP an estimated $25 bn according to the Wall Street Journal.

    The same happened with ExxonMobil when sanctions were imposed on Russia in 2014 in the aftermath of its annexation of the Crimea. Exxon was not given a waiver to continue operating in a joint project with Rosneft in Russia’s Arctic and was forced to withdraw from the country at considerable losses.

    In the aftermath of Exxon’s departure, Russian oil companies jointly developed a homegrown state-of-the-art technology to continue developing Arctic oil and gas reserves and the Russian government poured hundreds of billions of dollars into these projects. By 2024 Russia will be adding 1.5 million barrels a day (mbd) to its production while Novatek has become a major LNG producer and exporter on its own.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News