• 20 mins Trader Trafigura Raises Share Of Oil Purchases From State Firms
  • 2 hours German Energy Group Uniper Rejects $9B Finnish Takeover Bid
  • 3 hours Total Could Lose Big If It Pulls Out Of South Pars Deal
  • 5 hours Dakota Watchdog Warns It Could Revoke Keystone XL Approval
  • 22 hours Oil Prices Rise After API Reports Major Crude Draw
  • 23 hours Citgo President And 5 VPs Arrested On Embezzlement Charges
  • 23 hours Gazprom Speaks Out Against OPEC Production Cut Extension
  • 24 hours Statoil Looks To Lighter Oil To Boost Profitability
  • 1 day Oil Billionaire Becomes Wind Energy’s Top Influencer
  • 1 day Transneft Warns Urals Oil Quality Reaching Critical Levels
  • 1 day Whitefish Energy Suspends Work In Puerto Rico
  • 1 day U.S. Authorities Arrest Two On Major Energy Corruption Scheme
  • 2 days Thanksgiving Gas Prices At 3-Year High
  • 2 days Iraq’s Giant Majnoon Oilfield Attracts Attention Of Supermajors
  • 2 days South Iraq Oil Exports Close To Record High To Offset Kirkuk Drop
  • 2 days Iraqi Forces Find Mass Graves In Oil Wells Near Kirkuk
  • 2 days Chevron Joint Venture Signs $1.7B Oil, Gas Deal In Nigeria
  • 2 days Iraq Steps In To Offset Falling Venezuela Oil Production
  • 2 days ConocoPhillips Sets Price Ceiling For New Projects
  • 5 days Shell Oil Trading Head Steps Down After 29 Years
  • 5 days Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 5 days Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 5 days $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 5 days Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 5 days Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 5 days Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 5 days Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 6 days Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 6 days Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 6 days Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 6 days Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 6 days Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 6 days Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 6 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 7 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 7 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 7 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 7 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 7 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 7 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners

This Week in Energy: April D-Day for Alaska’s Massive Gas Plans

This Week in Energy: April D-Day for Alaska’s Massive Gas Plans

Alaska stands at an interesting energy crossroads, with the State Legislature considering the fate of a massive liquefied natural gas project that would be an economic boost for the state and a new supply boost for Asian markets hungry for US LNG. The State Legislature session ends on 20 April and approval is by no means a foregone conclusion: Some Alaskan lawmakers don’t like the deal, which they say panders to oil companies at the expense of the state.

The project will cost between $45 billion and $65 billion and is backed by giants Exxon Mobil, BP and ConocoPhillips. It envisions transporting Alaskan North Slope gas 800 miles across the state to a new LNG plant on the south coast. The pipeline project is hoping to be green-lighted in full in 2018, but first it has to get past the state legislature. As the plan stands now, the state will take a 20-25% stake in the project and as such foot the bill for $10 billion of the project’s cost, with TransCanada potentially putting up half that amount.

Under the plan the state would commit to take its one-eighth royalty share of gas production in kind or in the form of gas for the duration of the project and also take state production taxes as a share of the gas.

Related Article: Alaska’s Largest Refinery to Close Down

The massive pipeline will run from the North Slope to the Kenai Peninsula south of Anchorage   and its total cost is seven times more than Keystone XL, whose approval is still languishing in Washington where it requires a presidential sign-off because of its cross-border element. The Alaskan pipeline project is more than a pipeline, though; it includes harbors, roads and gas liquefaction facilities.  

One of the biggest bolsterers of this project has been Alaska’s recent oil and gas tax reforms, which pave the way to tap into over 8 trillion cubic feet of gas in Alaska’s North Slope. This is one of the world’s largest reserves, so there is much at stake.

These tax reforms are also the origin of the bulk of criticism of this project. Oil companies provide around 90% of the state’s unrestricted revenues, and the oil tax reform passed last year and taking effect in January 2014, removed some of the bigger fees oil companies had to pay before. There is plenty of public opposition to these reforms and a referendum to repeal the new system is scheduled to be held in August.

Economically, for Alaska the new pipeline/LNG project could be up to $3 billion more in revenues annually by 2024 and thousands of jobs. It would also mean more energy stability for Alaskans and afford them an opportunity for lower heating costs as the pipeline would have five offtake points to provide gas to Alaskans.

Legislators are now examining the details of the proposal, which would give TransCanada, the Canadian pipeline giant, a the right to invest in and own a share of the North Slope gas treatment plant and pipeline, while the state would invest directly in, and own a share of the LNG plant in sufficient to convert the state gas into LNG for sale. The state would the option to purchase all or part of TransCanada’s share of the project at certain points. What the state needs to decide by April is whether it is going to participate in the project at all, what the level of participation should be and what the next steps are. If the state legislature approves the “enabling legislation” in April, a longer-term “Precedent Agreement” between the state and TransCanada could be the next step.

Related Article: More Trouble in the Arctic for Shell

In an exclusive interview this week with Oilprice.com, Adam Sieminski, administrator of the US Energy Information Agency (EIA), says that Alaska just might surprise us. (coming out on Monday)

“We think the economics ultimately will favor construction of an LNG facility in Alaska that would allow the production from the associated gas in the North Slope of Alaska,” Sieminksi said.

We also have a great letter lined up for subscribers to premium. Take a moment to see why so many others have subscribed to our premium service by clicking here. Best of all it costs you absolutely nothing to give it a try.

By James Stafford
Editor, Oilprice.com




Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News