• 8 minutes U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 13 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 16 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 hours Dyson Will Build Its Electric Cars in Singapore
  • 2 hours Iraq war and Possible Lies
  • 2 hours Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 6 hours Despite pressure about Khashoggi's Murder: Saudi Arabia Reassures On Oil Supply, Says Will Meet Demand
  • 10 hours China Opens Longest Mega-Bridge Linking Hong Kong to Mainland
  • 2 hours How Long Until We Have Working Nuclear Fusion Reactor?
  • 8 hours The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 4 hours Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 6 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 57 mins The Touching Story of a First Nation that Sued Trans Mountain
  • 6 hours World to Install Over One Trillion Watts of Clean Energy by 2023
  • 9 hours These are the world’s most competitive economies: US No. 1
  • 13 hours Aramco to Become Major Player in LNG?
  • 3 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
Alt Text

Oil Majors Win Big In New NAFTA Deal

The recent renegotiation of NAFTA…

Alt Text

Oil Markets Tremble As Chinese Stocks Crash

The steep plunge in Chinese…

Alt Text

Canadian Oil Patch Grapples With Cannabis Legalization

Canada has officially legalized recreational…

Robert Bryce

Robert Bryce

Robert is a writer at Energy Tribune

More Info

Trending Discussions

The Reality of Global Power Demand and Oil Consumption

When considering the global energy sector, one of the most difficult tasks is understanding the gargantuan scale of our energy consumption.

Talking about scale should be an integral part of our energy discussion now, particularly given the large number of politicians and activists who are contending that we must completely overhaul our energy and power delivery systems and in doing so, give up all carbon-based fuels.

That notion appeals to many people. And it’s been given a big nudge by the oil blowout in the Gulf of Mexico. But that notion must be confronted with reality. And that’s where the issue of scale comes roaring onto the scene.

Oil Consumption Figures

Global commercial energy use now stands at about 226 million barrels of oil equivalent. Of that quantity, about 79 million barrels comes from oil, 66 million from coal, 55 million from gas, about 12 million from nuclear and about 14 million from hydropower. Obviously, hydrocarbons are the biggest portion of the global energy mix, accounting for about 200 million barrels of oil equivalent per day.

But those quantities of energy are nearly impossible to comprehend.

What is 226 million barrels of oil equivalent? Well, try thinking of it this way: it’s approximately equal to the total daily oil output of 27 Saudi Arabias. Since the 1973 Arab Oil Embargo, Saudi Arabia’s oil production has averaged about 8.5 million barrels per day.

So let’s suppose we want to quit using hydrocarbons. Fine. Global daily hydrocarbon use is about 200 million barrels of oil equivalent, or about 23.5 Saudi Arabias per day. Thus, if the world’s policymakers really want to quit using carbon-based fuels, then we will need to find the energy equivalent of 23.5 Saudi Arabias every day, and all of that energy must be carbon-free.

While Saudi Arabia provides an easily understandable metric for global energy use, what we humans really care about is power. (Remember that energy is the ability to do work. Power is the rate at which work gets done.)

Let’s convert those global energy consumption numbers into power terms. That will be easy as they are provided in barrels of oil equivalent per day, and that means they are readily converted into familiar power metrics: watts and horsepower.

A barrel of oil contains 5.8 million Btu. That’s equal to about 5.8 billion joules (5.8 GJ). To obtain watts, we must divide those joules by seconds. (Remember that power = energy/time). We must therefore divide our 5.8 gigajoules by 86,400 seconds, which is the number of seconds in 24 hours.

We must also account for the heat lost during the conversion of that oil into useful power. The result: each barrel of oil equivalent produces about 22,152 watts, or about 29.7 horsepower. For simplicity, let’s call it 30 horsepower per barrel of oil equivalent per day.

Multiplying global energy use of 226 million barrels of oil equivalent in primary energy each day, by 30 horsepower per barrel means the world consumes about 6.8 billion horsepower, all day, every day.

Therefore, roughly speaking, the world consumes about 1 horsepower per person. Of course, this power availability is not spread evenly. Americans use about 4.5 hp per capita, while their counterparts in Pakistan and India use less than 0.25 hp.

World Power Consumption, By Primary Energy Source, in Horsepower (Watts)

Energy Usage

By Seth Myers  Source: Power Hungry: The Myths of “Green” Energy and the Real Fuels of the Future

While those numbers are telling, they are somewhat unwieldy. Thus, it makes sense to look at global power consumption in watts. Using the numbers cited above, we find that global power consumption is about 5.1 trillion watts, or 5.1 terawatts.

Using watts allows us to see the disparity in power consumption much more clearly. For instance, the average resident of India consumes about 167 watts while the average Brazilian uses 516 watts. Meanwhile, the average resident of the US consumes 3,366 watts.

Per-Capita Power Consumption in the Six Most Populous Countries, in Watts

Green Energy

By Seth Myers  Source: Power Hungry: The Myths of “Green” Energy and the Real Fuels of the Future

Amidst all of our discussions about energy and power we must keep the issue of scale foremost in mind. We cannot, we will not, make a major change in our energy and power delivery systems at any time in the near future because the vast scale of those systems will make any transition away from our existing systems slow and expensive.

By Robert Bryce

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on May 28 2010 said:
    $65/barrel is the cut-off point for profitability for deep ocean drilling and also tar sand and oil shale. Like you say, it costs more. A few days ago the price of oil was about $68/barrel. Speculation is one thing, but supply and demand still applies. A international slowdown is appropriate to push down the price of crude below $65 dollars. It's a step at mobilizing and helping consumer's understand that they(we) are not helpless. When you "Drive Easy" you save gas. Our grassroot's organization is 30,000 global supporter's and we have all the physics on our web site www.driveeasy.org. Conservation needs to be totally explored and applied along with more bikes and walking shoes. We really need to empower the consumer's and that would be step one. Remember...DriveEasy...Conserve.
  • Anonymous on May 30 2010 said:
    New energy is only half the picture. The other is efficiency:1) the reurbanization of our city instead of sprawl2) the reconstruction of trolleys, light rail, passenger rail, high speed rail, etc.3) LED and OLED lighting4) the redesign of electronics to be energy sipping5) LEED standards in western buildings, insulation and even simple things like heat pumpsOn the energy front there are Thorium Reactors which consume toxic waste in the burn, algae and bacteria genetically engineered bio-reactors for all forms of renewablesIF THE GOVERNMENT WOULD ONLY EQUALIZE SUBSIDIES ACROSS ALL FORMS OF ENERGY AND EQUALIZE SUBSIDIES FOR BASED ON ENERGY CONSERVATION/EFFICIENCY THE TRANSITION WOULD BE EMBRACED INSTEAD OF FOUGHT AND CHEAP INSTEAD OF EXPENSIVE!BUT THE GOVERNMENT LIKES TO PICK WINNERS AND LOSERS...

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News