• 5 minutes Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 11 minutes Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 6 hours The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 12 hours Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 1 day Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 33 mins Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 11 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 14 mins Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 1 day Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 21 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 1 day France Will Close All Coal Fired Power Stations By 2021
  • 1 day Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 4 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 12 hours Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 20 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
Alt Text

Are The Saudis Involved In The Tesla Buyout Plan?

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund…

Alt Text

The Oil Bulls Are Back

Oil markets had a bullish…

Alt Text

Analysts: SPR Release Won’t Lower Gasoline Prices

U.S. drivers are unlikely to…

Sohbet Karbuz

Sohbet Karbuz

Born in 1965, I am an engineer and an economist by education (BSc, MSc, PhD, PostDoc), a number cruncher by experience, an energy analyst by…

More Info

Trending Discussions

The Real Reason Why the U.S. Military is Going Green

The U.S. military consumed almost 500 thousand barrels per day of oil at the end of the Cold War. In FY 2011, its oil consumption was down to 355 thousand barrels per day despite increasing activity in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. And yet, military oil consumption has become a strategic vulnerability, an operational Achilles’ heel, and a readiness challenge, only in the past decade. Why?

Remember, in March 2003, Lt General James Mattis (former commander of the 1st Marine Division, during the drive to Baghdad) called on the DOD to "unleash us from the tether of fuel." Former Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne spearheaded the DOD’s push into alternative fuels in 2005 by creating a task force. Then came in 2006 Maj. Gen. Richard Zilmer's operational request from Anbar Province for a "self-sustainable energy solution." This was followed by the January 2007 SOTU address of the former US President Bush, who said "For too long our nation has been dependent on foreign oil. And this dependence leaves us more vulnerable to hostile regimes and to terrorists who could cause huge disruptions in oil shipments, raise the price of oil and do harm to our economy." Repeating what Bush has said in 2007, Ray Mabus, Secretary of the Navy, has taken the lead since 2009 for pushing biofuels as a remedy to the DoD’s dependence on oil. Why?

Forget all the talks about becoming a green military, the security threat of climate change etc, the real reason is the DoD’s increasing fuel costs.

Just look at the chart below, between 2003 and 2011, the DOD’s oil consumption decreased 10%. And yet its fuel costs tripled and reached $19 billion.

Fuel consumption and its cost

The reason is the increasing oil price of course.

When we look at the fuel costs by DOD services, we see the biggest increase in the Army (9 times), followed by Air Force, Marines and Navy (less than 3 times).

Fuel costs and oil prices

Between June 2007 and June 2012, the DOD services purchased more than 15 million gallons of alternative fuels for testing and certifying efforts (in tactical vehicles). Army’s share is less than 3 percent. The rest is by the Air Force and Navy. So, why does the Army play such a low profile despite a hefty fuel bill and while the others are always in the news headlines? Why?

As the saying goes, facts are many but the truth is one. The truth is that the US military will continue to run on conventional oil and neither biofuels nor technology can change it at least in the next 2 decades. Better to accept this reality and spend the hard earned taxpayers money wisely.

By. Sohbet Karbuz




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News