• 15 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 17 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 19 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 20 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 21 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 22 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 23 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 1 day New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 1 day Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 1 day Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 1 day Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 2 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 5 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Is OPEC Considering Deeper Output Cuts?

You could argue OPEC and…

Alt Text

Footloose Iraq Cannibalizes Saudi Market Share

OPEC’s de-facto leader Saudi Arabia…

The Final Twist: OPEC Demands A Non-OPEC Cut


With less than a week to go until the much-anticipated OPEC meeting in Vienna on November 30, the oil exporting cartel still seems unable to determine the terms of production cut quotas, who will be exempt from cutting, and even who will participate. According to Reuters, in the latest twist to emerge, as OPEC tries to find the sweet spot for production that reduces the oversupply of crude, the organization will ask non-OPEC oil producers to also make big cuts in output, as it seeks to share the burden of declining output and prevent market share gains by non-OPEC nations.

The oil minister of Azerbaijan was quoted as saying the cartel may want non-OPEC producers to cut output by as much as 880,000 barrels per day (bpd). "It could be expected that OPEC members may ask non-OPEC countries to cut production volumes for the next six months starting from Jan. 1 2017 ... by 880,000 barrels from the total daily production," Azeri newspaper Respublika quoted the country's oil minister, Natig Aliyev, as saying.

Reuters then reported that an OPEC source had claimed the group had yet to decide on the final figures to be discussed on Nov. 28, when OPEC and non-OPEC experts meet in Vienna. As previously reported, OPEC is expected to discuss production cuts of 4.0-4.5 percent among its members at the Vienna meeting, complying with the roughly 1.2 mmbpd reduction as set forth in the Algiers meeting, which outlined a total OPEC output of 32.5-33.0 mmbpd. Iran and Iraq, however, still have reservations about how much they want to contribute.

A cut of 880,000 bpd would represent less than 2 percent of current total non-OPEC output.

Shortly after the report came out, Russian energy minister Alexander Novak said Russia was working with Kazakhstan and Mexico, though not the United States, on joint output curbs, but reiterated that Moscow would prefer to freeze output rather than cut. He said that a freeze would be “quite a difficult and harsh situation for us as our plans envisioned an output growth next year."

In an amusing twist, Russia floated the concept of a "pro-forma" cut, saying that by keeping its production fixed, it would be an effective "cut" to its 2017 production plan.

A production cap would mean Russia pumping 200,000 to 300,000 barrels a day less than planned in 2017, Energy Minister Alexander Novak told reporters in Moscow on Thursday, or as Bloomberg's Will Kennedy put it, Russia is trying to "sell a production freeze as a cut."

"According to our plans, (Russia's) oil output is going up next year. If we keep production at the current level we are making our contribution, for us that essentially means a cut of 200,000-300,000 barrels per day (in 2017)", he said.

(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)

Novak also said that Russia’s position “has remained unchanged and consistent” (even if the algos may have misinterpreted it), and added that “as our president said earlier, we are ready to freeze production at the current levels.” President Vladimir Putin on Monday reaffirmed the country is willing to freeze, adding he sees no obstacles to an OPEC agreement this month after the group made major progress in overcoming differences.

In other words, one can forget about a production cut from Russia, which - like OPEC - is already pumping at record output levels. Russian output increased to a record 11.205 million barrels a day in November, near a post-Soviet record. The country has raised its production forecasts several times a year since 2015. Related: Russia Is Finally Making Headway In Its Pivot East

While Russia, the largest crude supplier outside OPEC, has reiterated its preference for a freeze over a cut for several months, members of the group, including Saudi Arabia, had been expecting the nation would eventually join a cut, according to people briefed on the matter. If Russia and other non-OPEC producers balk at the idea of cutting output, the exporters’ group could reconsider pushing ahead, the people said.

As Bloomberg reminds us, if there’s no agreement to restrict output, the International Energy Agency has said that oil prices are likely to fall in 2017. OPEC’s own estimates of supply and demand also show that the Algiers agreement would barely drain a record oil surplus next year without the cooperation of non-members.

Which means that the role of Russia, and other non-OPEC members, will be critical in the shaping of next week's deal, Emmanuel Kachikwu, Nigeria’s minister of state for petroleum, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. “Russia is as interested in firming up the price as we are,” he said. A senior OPEC delegate told Reuters earlier this week that full participation by Moscow would be required: "Statements from Moscow indicating they are not willing to participate in a cut but just to freeze - this will make it difficult for OPEC to rebalance the market alone and bring prices up."

Putting even a cut of 880,000 bpd in context, this would represent less than 2 percent of current total non-OPEC output. But given few non-OPEC producers are expected to participate in the cuts, the burden could be heavy on those that do so - potentially Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Mexico, all of which rely heavily on oil revenues.

To summarize:

The good news: an ideal scenario, should OPEC and non-OPEC members reach a deal to cut 1 million bpd and 880,000 bpd in production respectively, it would immediately help the market turn into a supply deficit and help erode record stocks amounting to over 3 billion barrels. It would also likely send the price of oil to the upper-$50 range.

The bad news: according to the head of the IEA, Faith Birol, U.S. shale oil producers - which are in no way bound to any production cuts or freezes - will increase their output if oil prices hit $60 a barrel, meaning OPEC will have to walk a fine line if it curtails production to prop up prices, the head of the International Energy Agency (IEA) said.

"If this decision pushes the prices up (to) around $60 dollars, we may well see a significant increase from shale oil from the U.S.," Fatih Birol told Reuters on Wednesday. He said this level would be enough for many U.S. shale companies to restart stalled production, although it would take around nine months for the new supply to reach the market. Related: Is OPEC Playing The Oil Markets Again?

Low prices have led to two consecutive years of falling investment in upstream oil and gas investments, a pattern Birol expects to continue in 2017. This, he said, could lead to tighter oil supply and price spikes in the future.

"We are entering a period of greater oil price volatility and the companies, organizations and countries should prepare themselves accordingly," he said.

Finally, adding to the complexity, there are two more wildcards: one is Iran oil production and whether Trump will seek to undo the Iranian nuclear deal. Should that happen, and if sanctions are reintroduced, some 1 million barrels in daily oil exports from Iran may go offline, further pressuring the market. The other is suddenly waning Chinese demand, on what some analysts have speculated is the result of the Chinese Strategic Petroleum Reserve approaching full status, which could eliminate as much as 1.1 million bpd in demand from the market once China stops filling up its extensive SPR.

By Zerohedge

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Jim Decker on November 24 2016 said:
    So OPEC has raised production the last couple of years, while the U.S. has dropped production substantially. Now, OPEC wants other non-cartel producers to cut production. Don't these fools in the cartel understand how vulnerable they are? Free marketers (if there are any left) abhor cartels.

    It is time to screw the cartel and Russia totally. Put a $10 a barrel tariff on non-NAFTA oil. Make it revenue neutral by cutting the gas tax. This will force the world oil price to be $10 per barrel less than the U.S. price. The U.S. will become energy independent and a few cartel nations will go totally belly up. The rest will not be able to afford their military budgets. Fine, they are all dictatorships. Not a nickel of their oil revenue is getting to the poor in those nations anyway.
  • nicolas ravizzoli on November 25 2016 said:
    Reaching an agreement over production cuts seems complicated at this point. Too many participants from OPEC and non-OPEC. Many of them are even trying to increase production so best case scenario we may get a production freeze. it is tough to trust that everyone might keep their word and not try to take advantage. In addition, shale oil and other private participants might pump more if price goes up, so OPEC is at a crossroad debating what is the best way to go; should they step in to stabilize prices or should they keep waiting for the market to balance on its own?
    Mr. market is more inclined over the former, so if the later ocurrs then we might be going back to the $30's.
    Just the humble opinion from a small investor!
  • Carol on November 29 2016 said:
    Arabs have a population fecundity problem, not an oil price problem. Cut back the population and live happily ever after on $30/bbl oil.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News