• 1 day PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 2 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Oil Fundamentals Overturn Geopolitical Risk

Geopolitical risk from Iraq and…

Alt Text

The Next Big Digital Disruption In Energy

Blockchain technology is transforming the…

Alt Text

Russia And China Continue To Boost Oil Ties

The Russia-China alliance is strengthening…

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel Graeber is a writer and political analyst based in Michigan. His work on matters related to the geopolitical aspects of the global energy sector,…

More Info

The Energy Debate and the War of Emotions

The Energy Debate and the War of Emotions

Advocates of the shale gas boom in the United States and the corresponding oil sands surge in Canada point to the thousands of potential jobs and benefits to national energy security possible through the abundance of natural resources. Critics, for their part, say that conventional resources like oil and gas are relics of a bygone era, noting it's time to embrace new, less threatening forms of energy like solar, wind and wave power. Central to either side of the debate, however, is the power of appeal. It's not so much the information that's integral to the conversation but the level of emotional appeal that's driving the national debate.

In the late 1850s, incumbent Sen. Stephen Douglas squared off against Abraham Lincoln in a series of debates that drew thousands of people and journalists from across the United States. The debate format featured one candidate speaking for an hour, followed by a 90-minute rebuttal and then another 30 minute response. That's three hours if the timing was impeccable. Most Americans today can barely sit through the State of the Union address, and Obama's 2012 address clocked in at roughly an hour, 15 minutes. The point being that debate tolerance today has been sacrificed for the sake of speed and extremity. Few people, outside of those intimately involved in the industry, care to hear about plunger lifts, well-venting and refracture rate data from the 51-page survey of CH4 emissions tied to unconventional natural gas production produced by the American Petroleum Institute and America's Natural Gas Alliance. More news media consumers would prefer earthquakes and groundwater contamination tied to so-called fracking or to hear about how the EPA is ruining the economy with its burdensome regulation.

" Keystone XL Would Increase Gas Prices, Study Finds," reads one headline.

"Keystone pipeline will bring jobs, greater energy independence," reads another.

That's a debate for certain, but about what? And for who? Energy independence? Maybe. Environmental protection? Perhaps.

Does it matter? It does if you're in the business of selling a product, which is what the API and ANGA are doing just as emphatically as the news services, and elected officials, behind those headlines.

It's not popular, or news savvy, to say that Keystone XL would exceed U.S. regulatory requirements when, and if, it's constructed. Nor is it sexy to say those earthquakes in Ohio attributed to fracking were about as severe as a passing train and were the result of an intersection of an existing fault line.

More than 150 years ago, most audiences were content to listen to four-hour debates over slavery in large part because that's all there were available. No Twitter or Facebook. No Bill O'Reilly's or Chris Matthew's. Nothing but deduction, conceptualization, and context-driven debate.

Neil Postman, a media theorist, lamented this growing trend almost 30 years ago. He worried not that societal trends mean the truth is hidden but that it would lost to irrelevancy. To paraphrase his point, consider what you really plan to do about the Keystone XL pipeline, hydraulic fracturing of natural gas, unsightly windmills off the Massachusetts coast, trace levels of radiation from Japan in fish or any number of the hot-button issues in the media. The answer is nothing. You'll do nothing about it. You may express your opinion, but opinion today is tomorrow's headline. You may vote, but at best you do that once every two years.

We're getting there. There's been only one Deepwater Horizon tragedy and, all things considered, very few Chernobyl's. The trees outside your office window look more or less the same as last year even though it was a bit warmer. People's first reaction is always an emotional one. When it comes to issues like energy, which defines everything from how we get to work to what appliances we use, sit back and hold your fire. If you're lucky, you might be able to hear the quiet debate over the din of the war of emotions.

By. Daniel Graeber of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Oliver K. Manuel on June 07 2012 said:
    Daniel,

    Life is sustained by a flow of energy (heat, light, particles and fields) that extend out from the Sun's core to engulf the Earth and all other planets in the solar system.

    Copernicus discovered Earth is a minor satellite orbiting a massive ‘Sol’ (333,000 times more mass than Earth)in 1543:

    http://tinyurl.com/7qx7zxs

    The current demise of society stems from actions world leaders took in 1945 when they saw:

    a.) Energy from the core of uranium atoms vaporize Hiroshima on 6 Aug 1945

    b.) Energy from the core of plutonium atoms destroy Nagasaki on 9 Aug 1945

    c.) Established the United Nations to "save society" from nuclear destruction on 24 Oct 1945

    d.) Promoted misinformation on energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of heavy atoms, stars and galaxies from 1946 [1,2] to the present.

    [1] Fred Hoyle, “The chemical composition of the stars,” Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society 106, 255-59 (1946)

    [2] Fred Hoyle, “The synthesis of the elements from hydrogen,” Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society 106, 343-83 (1946)

    For documentation of events leading to Climategate, see: http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-105

    With kind regards,
    Oliver K. Manuel
    http://www.omatumr.com

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News