• 4 minutes "Natural Gas Trading Picks Up Considerably Amid High Volatility" by Charles Kennedy - ...And is U.S. NatGas Futures dramatically overbought at the $6.35 range?
  • 8 minutes How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 12 minutes  What Russia has reached over three months diplomatic and military pressure on West ?
  • 1 hour GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 1 day Revisiting: "The U.S. Grid Isn’t Ready For A Major Shift To Renewables" from March 2021 by Irina Slav at OILPRICE
  • 4 days How cheap Chinese tires might explain Russia's 'stalled' 40-mile-long military convoy in Ukraine
  • 4 hours Failure To Implement Russian Oil Ban Could Send Oil Crashing To $65
  • 8 days Will Variants and Ill-Health Continue to Plague Economic Outlooks?
  • 8 days "The Calm Before The Storm In Oil Markets" by Tom Kool of OILPRICE and seen at YahooFinance
  • 2 days Natural Gas is the Cleanest and most Likely Source of Energy to Fuel the World.
  • 8 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 8 days "Russia will stop 'in a moment' if Ukraine meets terms - Kremlin" by Reuters via Yahoo News...but Reuters suddenly cut out the balanced part of the story.
Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Russia Sanctions Scandal Only Begins With Flynn’s Resignation

The resignation of General Michael Flynn after only 24 days as national security advisor over secret conversations with a Russian diplomat may only be the beginning of a wider scandal.

As the White House considers a new national security advisor, and the debate now is centered on whether Flynn’s undisclosed talks concerned sanctions, and whether he was acting ‘rogue’, the controversy may not simply end with a resignation.

National security is in question here.

Last week, the Washington Post revealed that Flynn and Kislyak had discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia in the leading up to Trump’s inauguration as president, despite assurances from Flynn and Pence that sanctions were never discussed with Russian officials.

Flynn has assumed responsibility, with his resignation, as a rogue actor in this scenario, claiming to have kept Vice-President Pence in the dark.

Trump supporters are shifting the scandal to one of wiretapping and leaks, focusing on the press leaks that uncovered the wiretaps of Flynn’s conversations with Russian diplomat Sergei Kislyak.

“I expect for the FBI to tell me what is going on, and they better have a good answer,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), told the Washington Post. Nunes was a member of the Trump transition team executive committee. Related: Trump’s First Law Removes Transparency Rule For Big Oil

“The big problem I see here is that you have an American citizen who had his phone calls recorded,” said Nunes.

On the other side of this deepening national security debate, which has conjured up talk of treason, Foreign Policy magazine noted today that “The Trump administration no doubt hopes that by firing Flynn, it can signal he was acting alone, that he “went rogue.” But without a credible, thorough investigation into what transpired before the election, it is impossible to know if Flynn was following the administration’s playbook and whether Trump or his administration is guilty of something much more serious.”

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Max on February 15 2017 said:
    47 days as National Security Advisor? You mean 24 days? Flynn's time with the campaign and during the transition don't count as an official term of office, that only begins when he is sworn in. Already his supporters are trying to make the case that since he was the "designee" it was "ok" for him to start calling other governments before he was official. It is not. We only have one president at a time in this country (and one administration), for a reason.
  • Dar Danes on February 15 2017 said:
    Your first mistake is getting you information from the Washington Post, which is fake partisan news similar to CNN or MSNBC. Let us know when you write another article using reliable sources. Otherwise you are really just wasting the readers time.
  • Bud on February 15 2017 said:
    This is about Iran.
  • will on February 15 2017 said:
    The WaPo article did NOT say Flynn had discussed sanctions. It specifically said "The FBI in late December reviewed intercepts of communications between the Russian ambassador to the United States and retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn — national security adviser to then-President-elect Trump — but has not found any evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties to the Russian government, U.S. officials said."
  • Rock on February 16 2017 said:
    The public is already losing interest over this ginned up scandal. We have no one's word for all of these leaks except the media. The media is becoming known for its fake news. It is a sad case of the media pleasuring itself with an auto-hand job and imagining a grand affair with a world class beauty. The sad and poignant decay of modern journalism takes one's breath away.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News