• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 4 days They pay YOU to TAKE Natural Gas
  • 5 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 9 hours What fool thought this was a good idea...
  • 3 days Why does this keep coming up? (The Renewable Energy Land Rush Could Threaten Food Security)
  • 9 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
Oil Rig Counts Falls as WTI Holds Below $80

Oil Rig Counts Falls as WTI Holds Below $80

The total number of active…

Inflation Fears Keep Oil Prices Suppressed

Inflation Fears Keep Oil Prices Suppressed

The week began positively with…

Republicans Pressure Biden to Deliver Weapons to Israel

Republicans Pressure Biden to Deliver Weapons to Israel

The U.S. House of Representatives…

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba is a writer and journalist based in Mexico City. She has extensive experience writing and editing environmental features, travel pieces, local news in the…

More Info

Premium Content

Putin’s Energy Weapon Is Losing Its Power

  • Russia is slowly but surely, losing its war against Ukraine.
  • Putin’s energy weapon was nullified by unseasonably warm weather in Europe. 
  • The Kremlin has threatened to flex Russia’s considerable nuclear might, but experts believe it may be the empty rhetoric of a losing team.

Vladimir Putin’s plans are falling to pieces. Slowly but surely, Russia is losing its war against Ukraine. At the same time, it is losing nearly all of its most key political and economic allies, and losing a decent chunk of the market for its energy exports, which serve as the backbone of the Russian economy. Euractive has called Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine a “profound miscalculation” and states that “at the political level, Putin is trying to influence the UN agenda but has succeeded in being little more than a pariah." 

This doesn’t mean, however, that the war is over. Experts estimate that Russia still has approximately 1.3-1.5m tons of Soviet-era munition stored away. This hoard would be enough to last until May or June of this year at the present bombardment rate. And then there’s the country’s annual munitions production capacity of around 500,000 tonnes per year. “Putin might not escalate, reports Euractiv, “but buying time will support a war of attrition rather than accept failure.”

Of course, Russia is threatening to escalate. As world leaders converge to arm Ukraine in support of the besieged country, Putin has made threats to flex the Kremlin’s considerable nuclear might. Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu has also said that Russia will not be backing down, but rather be deploying more soldiers and more military infrastructure. However, many experts believe this to be the empty rhetoric of a losing team. Put simply, it’s not clear whether Russia has the funds to continue to draw out this war. "Shoigu's announcements since December have been a little surreal to see," said Dara Massicot, a senior policy researcher at RAND Corporation, was quoted by CBS News. "[His] statements of more billets and more divisions will need more people and equipment to populate them (even if they fall short of targets). This is a tall order to achieve by 2026 without major changes to the Russian economy and personnel system."

The fact is that Russia is running out of money. An unseasonably warm winter in Europe has so far foiled Putin’s plans to ratchet up oil and gas prices to fund the nation’s considerable military expenses. Last month, Russia’s fossil fuel export revenues fell 17%, marking their lowest level since before the invasion of Ukraine early last year. The European Union’s most recent round of sanctions, buoyed by the warm weather, have also hit the Kremlin where it hurts: since December, Russia’s net energy export revenues declined a whopping €160 million ($172 million) a day.

Yes, gas prices are still high, but the punishing prices and shortages predicted have not materialized, and Europe’s natural gas storage has been refilled. There’s still the chance that an extreme and prolonged cold snap in the coming months could tip the scales back in Russia’s favor, but as of now the projections are rosy for the European bloc. “Most industry predictions are now for the spring and summer gas storage refill season to start from a high base,” reports the Financial Times, “calming fears that winter 2023/24 could be a bigger challenge given the much lower Russian flows compared with the first half of last year.”

What’s more, other oil and gas producers are stepping up to fill the gap left by flagging Russian imports. According to Quartz, “the US is surpassing Russia as Europe's top energy supplier,” while also warning that the market is set to tighten later this year, meaning it may be a bit too early to celebrate. China is a major factor in volatile energy prices, and the country’s return to the world economy after finally ending its zero-Covid policy could majorly upend the market once the current Covid surge is under control. 

Considering this, it’s important that Europe keeps its eye on the horizon. Even if this winter continues to be mild, there’s no guarantee that Russian energy exports will remain sufficiently suppressed to bring about an early end to the war. The only real way to win the energy war, according to the Financial Times, is to divest from fossil fuels and bolster domestic energy production capacity through longer-term climate-resilient solutions such as nuclear, wind, and solar.

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com


More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • DoRight Deikins on January 24 2023 said:
    Talk of energy security, nuclear energy is the bottom of the list. Chairman Putin doesn't need to use nuclear weapons, one well-placed salvo of conventional weapons 'by mistake' on a western sited nuclear facility in Ukraine (Khmelnytskyi or Rivne) would serve his purpose. And my personal guess is that NATO would not retaliate, since it was a mistake by conventional weapons for which there would be generous apologies. A good westerly wind would spread the pollution cloud over a significant proportion of Ukraine, perhaps even Kyiv.

    Of course the reactors are reputedly hardened against attack (by the Russian builders!). That's energy security, for ya.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on January 24 2023 said:
    It is obvious that geopolitical, strategic and energy affairs are beyond the author’s depth and grasp otherwise it wouldn’t be writing such an article.

    Russia will prevail in the Ukraine conflict and get all its legitimate demands regarding Ukraine. President Putin will never accept defeat in Ukraine even if this leads to a full-fledged nuclear war.

    Moreover, Putin’s energy weapon is neither losing its power nor will it ever lose it for the following reasons.

    1- Russia is the world’s superpower of energy.

    2- Its energy exports are irreplaceable now or ever.

    3- As long as the global economy continues to be driven by fossil fuels, Russia’s energy weapon could never lose power.

    4- Russia’s energy weapon forced the EU to pay in ruble for its Russian oil and gas imports thus making the ruble an energy currency.

    5- This same weapon enabled Russia to achieve surpluses in both its current account and trade balance amounting to $228 bn and $290 bn respectively in 2022.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Global Energy Expert

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News