• 5 minutes Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 8 minutes IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 14 minutes Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 17 minutes Could Tesla Buy GM?
  • 1 min Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 6 hours OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 6 hours Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 9 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 2 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 5 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 3 hours Sleeping Hydrocarbon Giant
  • 3 hours USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 7 hours And the War on LNG is Now On
  • 5 hours Air-to-Fuels Energy and Cost Calculation
  • 20 hours Rigs Down
  • 19 hours Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
Alt Text

OPEC Surprises Markets With Last Minute Deal

Oil markets appeared to have…

Alt Text

Will Canadian Oil Producers Cut Output?

The Canadian oil industry is…

Alt Text

Hapless Alberta Takes Action As Oil Prices Crash

Alberta’s politicians are scrambling to…

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel Graeber is a writer and political analyst based in Michigan. His work on matters related to the geopolitical aspects of the global energy sector,…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Power, Greed, Political Influence: Whose Energy Debate is This?

Billionaire Tom Steyer launched a campaign to rival the conservative Koch brothers and supporters of the Keystone XL oil pipeline. A rival campaign that cost a Nevada solar power project more than a quarter of its designed capacity, however, shows there are deep divisions, along with powerful political forces, driving U.S. energy policy.

Steyer, founder of global investment firm Farallon Capital Management, hosted top Democratic leaders last week, vowing to put up $50 million of his own money and raise $50 million more to back the party's pro-green leaders.

The event, backed by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, was meant as a counterweight to a conservative effort from the billionaire Koch brothers, Charles and David, to drive the Republican agenda through along with the Keystone XL pipeline.

Related Article: Keystone XL’s Miniscule CO2 Impact and the Bigger Picture

Gene Karpinski, president of the League of Conservation Voters, said there's a "jarring disconnect" in how Democrats and Republicans frame the national energy debate. Republicans, he said, have an obvious "anti-environmental" agenda, while rivals in the Democratic party "are overwhelmingly pro-environment."

When President Obama announced measures to improve fuel efficiency for medium- and heavy-duty trucks last week, he sang a refrain familiar to Republicans that the effort could help reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.

"America is closer to energy independence than we’ve been in decades," he said.

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said Obama's much-lauded "all-of-the-above" energy policy was also blazing news trails in the solar power sector. When Obama took office in 2009, she said, there were no solar projects approved on public lands. With the Stateline solar farm in California and Nevada's Silver State South project, however, there will be enough solar capacity online to meet the demands of 170,000 households serviced by Southern California Edison, one of the largest utility companies in the country.

Related Article: This Week in Energy: April D-Day for Alaska’s Massive Gas Plans

First Solar, the company behind the facilities, proposed State South as a 350 megawatt plant. It was forced to downsize by 100MW and fork over $7.1 million to mitigate risks to a desert tortoise habitat. Last year, environmental group Defenders of Wildlife threatened to sue over the solar project.

U.S. energy policy, Jewell said, requires a "long view." While high-profile issues like the "dirty" Keystone XL pipeline is fodder for energy wonks, issues like the broader climate debate don't do much in terms of driving a political agenda forward, according to critics mindful of Al Gore fatigue. Seyer's $100 million bet on a low-carbon Capitol Hill is likely a low energy initiative in and of itself. But even the greenest of debates has its foes, showing Obama's "all-of-the-above" energy policy may just as well describe its wide range of critics as much as its initiatives.

By Daniel J. Graeber




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News