• 4 minutes Pompeo: Aramco Attacks Are An "Act Of War" By Iran
  • 7 minutes Who Really Benefits From The "Iran Attacked Saudi Arabia" Narrative?
  • 11 minutes Trump Will Win In 2020
  • 15 minutes Experts review Saudi damage photos. Say Said is need to do a lot of explaining.
  • 2 hours Iran Vows Major War Even If US Conducts "Limited Strikes"
  • 5 hours Shale profitability
  • 5 hours When Trying To Be Objective About Ethanol, Don't Include Big Oil Lies To Balance The Argument
  • 8 hours Ethanol, the Perfect Home Remedy for A Saudi Oil Fever
  • 12 hours A little something for all you Offshore swabbies
  • 15 hours New designs will reduce transport fuels consumption
  • 32 mins Memorize date 05/15/2018 cause Huawei ban is the most important single event in world history after 9/11/2001.
  • 26 mins Europe: The Cracks Are Beginning To Show
  • 12 hours Let's shut down dissent like The Conversation in Australia
  • 6 hours One of the fire satellite pictures showed what look like the fire hit outside the main oil complex. Like it hit storage or pipeline facility. Not big deal.
  • 20 mins LA Times: Vote Trump out in 2020 to Prevent Climate Apocalypse
  • 16 hours Democrats and Gun Views
  • 3 hours Yawn... Parliament Poised to Force Brexit Delay Until Jan. 31
  • 14 hours US and China are already in a full economic war and this battle for global hegemony is a little bit frightening
Alt Text

The Biggest Winner In The Saudi Oil Supply Crisis

The weekend attacks on vital…

Alt Text

Wealthy Saudis Are Being Bullied Into Buying Aramco

Saudi Arabia is pressuring wealthy…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Oil Won’t Stage A Serious Rebound Until This Happens

Oil prices have shown signs of life over the past few weeks, as production declines in the U.S. raise expectations that the market is starting to adjust. As a result, Brent crude recently surpassed $40 per barrel for the first time in months.

A growling list of companies are capitulating, announcing production cuts for 2016. Continental Resources, for example, could see output fall by 10 percent. A range of other companies have made similar announcements in recent weeks. The energy world has been speculating about declines from U.S. shale, and the declines are finally starting to show up in the data.

Despite the newfound optimism that oil markets are balancing out, crude oil sitting in storage is at a record high in the United States. Energy investors may have preferred to focus U.S. production declines, or the fall in gasoline inventories in early March, but meanwhile crude oil stocks continue to signal that oversupply persists. Related: Why Oil Prices May Not Move Higher

Crude stocks rose once again last week, hitting yet another record of 521 million barrels. Storage levels at Cushing, Oklahoma, an all-important hub where the WTI benchmark price is determined, have surpassed 90 percent of capacity. U.S. output may be starting to decline, but it is doing so at a painfully slow rate.

(Click to enlarge)

It isn’t just a U.S. problem. Crude oil storage levels continue to climb around the world. Commercial stocks in the OECD surpassed 3 billion barrels in 2015. The EIA sees oil storage in the OECD rising to 3.24 billion barrels by the end of this year. It doesn’t stop there. Storage levels rise a bit more next year, hitting 3.30 billion barrels by the end of 2017.


That is a staggering forecast that should scare any oil investor. It also suggests that the price rally over the past few weeks, which has pushed oil prices up around 40 percent since early February, could be fleeting. There is evidence that suggests the rally was driven by speculators closing out short bets on oil, after accruing net-short positions at multiyear highs in recent months. In early March, hedge funds and other major investors shed short positions at the fastest rate in almost a year. The rally, then, hinged on the sudden shift in sentiment from oil speculators. Related: Solar Power Is About To Get MUCH Cheaper

The underlying fundamentals, however, have not appreciably changed in recent weeks. U.S. oil production is declining, but more or less at the same pace that it has for months.

On the other hand, rising inventories undercut the notion that the market is adjusting. As a result, as the short-covering rally reaches its limits, and the markets digest the fact that the world is still oversupplied with oil, prices could fall once again.

The problem, as mentioned above, is that inventories could continue to rise around the world through the rest of this year, if EIA data is anything to go by. Oil prices may have rallied in recent weeks, but the EIA was more pessimistic in March than it was in February. The EIA says that global storage levels could rise by 1.6 million barrels per day (million b/d) in 2016 and by another 0.6 million b/d in 2017. Those predictions are higher than the EIA’s February estimate. Related: Iran Aims For Highest Oil Production Since 2008

“With large global oil inventory builds expected to continue in 2016, oil prices are expected to remain near current levels,” the EIA concluded in early March. The EIA lowered its price forecast for Brent by $3 per barrel, expecting it to average $34 for the year.

2017 does not look much better: the EIA sees Brent prices averaging just $40 per barrel next year, a whopping $10 lower than what the EIA predicted last month. That could mean prices stay below $50 per barrel through 2017.

Price forecasts are always wrong, and often wildly off the mark. While it is difficult, if not impossible, to accurately predict price movements, especially a year or two out, it is impossible to argue with the sky-high levels of oil sitting in storage. Even if U.S. oil production continues to decline, the greater than 500 million barrels of oil inventories – a record high – need to start declining in a substantial way before the oil markets will see a sustained rally.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Jimmy Endle on March 15 2016 said:
    More oil in storage since the 19th century and economies in crawl mode.
    So why is WTI trading anywhere above $28 / b?
  • JOHANN SCHMEISSNER on March 16 2016 said:
    Hi Nick ,

    First the oilprice will soon climb and then much later the oilstocks will gradually decline securing highest profits not harming the pricerise.
    brgds from Moscow
  • James Rose on March 16 2016 said:
    Predictions of storage effect on oil pricing has to be adjusted for growth in storage capacity. Price collapse this year is a little bitter further away than last year because of the expansion of storage. Storage which hasn't reached 100% saturation also dampens price volatility.
  • Amvet on March 16 2016 said:
    So stored oil in the USA and in the OECD countries is above normal? So what? Over half of global oil is consumed in the non-OECD countries. Are their storage levels above normal??? Are their storage levels known?
    In addition, the US imports oil. If storage levels in the US were a problem, how about an undiscussed, radical, solution? Import less.
    Finally, the cat is out of the bag, oil prices are disconnected from supply and demand.
    Look at the futures trades of the giant funds and banks to see where oil prices are going.
  • Matt on March 16 2016 said:
    Interesting that the author quotes a total stocks volume figure in the billions of barrels but the chart is in "days of supply". Billions of barrels is certainly a more discouraging way to present the data. However, the chart reveals that it's a mere 12-14 days of extra supply over the period 2011-14. This larger stockpile is good if you ask me. In case the proverbial poo should hit the fan someday. Also, I don't know the approximate number, but much of that stock volume is what it takes to "prime" the transportation and refining system needed to supply the world with refined products.

    We do have too much supply on hand currently, but with the drastically reduced investment in future supply that has resulted from low prices, a day of reckoning is in the (mostly near) future on the supply/demand curves.
  • dhewitt on March 17 2016 said:
    a collegian article. Good try. Let me tell you how an executive looks at this. There are billions of dollars building these inventories for one reason, Profit.

    Get the picture?
  • JBH on May 19 2016 said:
    I'm late to the party but... The author and a lot of other people have completely missed the boat on the storage issue. It's not about the amount in storage it's about the percent of working capacity. At least some of the commenters got it right. Cushing is not a good measure anymore because of what is actually filling Cushing up...

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play