• 2 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 11 minutes China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 16 minutes When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 8 mins Oil prices going down
  • 2 hours We Need A Lasting Solution To The Lies Told By Big Oil and API
  • 2 hours Another WTH? Example of Cheap Renewables
  • 2 days Bullish and bearish outlook for oil
  • 2 days Rolls Royce shedding 4,600 jobs
  • 23 hours Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 1 day When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 1 day Russia's Rosneft 'Comfortable' With $70-$80 Oil Ahead of OPEC Talks
  • 33 mins What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 2 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 6 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 2 days U.S. Cars Will No Longer Need 55mpg Fuel Efficiency By 2025.
  • 39 mins The Permian Mystery
  • 2 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
  • 20 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 2 days OPEC soap opera daily update
Alt Text

Will Iran Pursue Relations With North Korea?

Some foreign policy analysts criticized…

Alt Text

The Nuclear Reactor That Makes Its Own Fuel

New nuclear reactor technology known…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Trending Discussions

No End to BP Settlement Deal

No End to BP Settlement Deal

BP is hoping that a US appeals court will get it out of a big fix over a settlement deal for the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill as billions more in claims pour in as loopholes open up new opportunities for settlement losses.

The interpretation of an $8 billion settlement with oil spill victims last year leaves a lot of doors open here, specifically because the agreement does not stipulate that claimants must prove that losses were related to the spill and sets no cap on compensation.

BP is now concerned that it could see countless billions added to its settlement bill, which has already cost $42 billion.

Among those new claims is a $21 million settlement for a rice mill operating 40 miles from the coast and from the oil spill, and whose profits, BP maintains, actually increased in 2010.

Related article: Are Pipeline Spills a Foregone Conclusion?

BP is now pleading with a US appeals court to have the interpretation of the 2012 settlement deal amended. A US District Judge has already agreed with the interpretation.

But the fact is, BP was a bit hasty with this deal, hoping to close out the case of the worst oil spill in history and start fresh. It was a panicked decision.

The 2012 settlement deal is only an estimate—one that is likely to be way off, to the tune of tens of billions.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans will hear BP’s appeal on 8 July, but analysts are not optimistic that they will reverse any earlier decisions.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News