• 6 minutes Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 23 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 2 hours Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 2 days The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 1 day Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 1 day Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 1 day Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 2 days Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 2 days Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 1 day Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 1 hour Hey Oil Bulls - How Long Till Increasing Oil Prices and Strengthening Dollar Start Killing Demand in Developing Countries?
  • 1 hour China goes against US natural gas
  • 2 days Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 2 days Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 19 hours Why hydrogen economics does not work
Alt Text

Venezuela’s Key Refineries At Risk Of Seizure

A decade ago, analysts suggested…

Alt Text

Philippines Cracks Down On Fuel Pirates

Though fuel smuggling in Southeast…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Trending Discussions

No End to BP Settlement Deal

No End to BP Settlement Deal

BP is hoping that a US appeals court will get it out of a big fix over a settlement deal for the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill as billions more in claims pour in as loopholes open up new opportunities for settlement losses.

The interpretation of an $8 billion settlement with oil spill victims last year leaves a lot of doors open here, specifically because the agreement does not stipulate that claimants must prove that losses were related to the spill and sets no cap on compensation.

BP is now concerned that it could see countless billions added to its settlement bill, which has already cost $42 billion.

Among those new claims is a $21 million settlement for a rice mill operating 40 miles from the coast and from the oil spill, and whose profits, BP maintains, actually increased in 2010.

Related article: Are Pipeline Spills a Foregone Conclusion?

BP is now pleading with a US appeals court to have the interpretation of the 2012 settlement deal amended. A US District Judge has already agreed with the interpretation.

But the fact is, BP was a bit hasty with this deal, hoping to close out the case of the worst oil spill in history and start fresh. It was a panicked decision.

The 2012 settlement deal is only an estimate—one that is likely to be way off, to the tune of tens of billions.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans will hear BP’s appeal on 8 July, but analysts are not optimistic that they will reverse any earlier decisions.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News