• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 8 days Does Toyota Know Something That We Don’t?
  • 2 days America should go after China but it should be done in a wise way.
  • 7 days World could get rid of Putin and Russia but nobody is bold enough
  • 9 days China is using Chinese Names of Cities on their Border with Russia.
  • 11 days Russian Officials Voice Concerns About Chinese-Funded Rail Line
  • 11 days OPINION: Putin’s Genocidal Myth A scholarly treatise on the thousands of years of Ukrainian history. RCW
  • 11 days CHINA Economy IMPLODING - Fastest Price Fall in 14 Years & Stock Market Crashes to 5 Year Low
  • 10 days CHINA Economy Disaster - Employee Shortages, Retirement Age, Birth Rate & Ageing Population
  • 1 min Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 1 day How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 10 days Putin and Xi Bet on the Global South
  • 11 days "(Another) Putin Critic 'Falls' Out Of Window, Dies"
Houthi Red Sea Attacks Are Boon for Pirates as Ships Reroute

Houthi Red Sea Attacks Are Boon for Pirates as Ships Reroute

It’s unlikely that surging piracy…

Microwave Energy Could Fix The Biggest Problem Facing EVs

Microwave Energy Could Fix The Biggest Problem Facing EVs

Researchers from the University of…

How To Play The Nuclear Power Renaissance

How To Play The Nuclear Power Renaissance

A nuclear renaissance seems likely,…

Climate Progress

Climate Progress

Joe Romm is a Fellow at American Progress and is the editor of Climate Progress, which New York Times columnist Tom Friedman called "the indispensable…

More Info

Premium Content

NASCAR's Effect on the Environment

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about possible ways that climate change could affect baseball. This time I want to talk about how a sport can impact the climate.

From constant travel to keeping the stadium lights on, every sport is energy intensive. But NASCAR — in which drivers race vehicles 500 miles at speeds of 200 miles per hour — takes energy intensity to a whole new level.

NASCAR is arguably the second most popular sport in America. Though it lacks some of the broad appeal of other sports, the 75 million people that watch it each weekend put the sport behind only the NFL in popularity. And that popularity has its environmental impact beyond what the casual fan might think about.

For example, NASCAR race cars are not subject to the EPA regulations that govern other vehicles on the road. They do not have catalytic converters mandated for every other car on the road. And until 2007, NASCAR used leaded gas — a toxic fuel that has hasn’t been used in the rest of the U.S. since the 1980′s.

On average, NASCAR cars get between 2 and 5 miles per gallon of gas. How Stuff Works explains:
“In a single typical NASCAR race weekend, with more than 40 cars at high speeds for 500 miles (804 kilometers) — plus practice laps — at 5 mpg of gas, you’re looking at, conservatively, about 6,000 gallons (22,712 liters) of fuel [source: Finney]. Each gallon burned emits about 20 pounds (9 kilograms) of carbon dioxide, so that’s about 120,000 pounds (54,431 kilograms) of CO2 for a race weekend [source: FuelEconomy]. Multiply that by roughly 35 races per year, and NASCAR’s annual carbon footprint is in the area of 4 million pounds (1.8 million kilograms).”

Four million pounds certainly isn’t going to tip the climate over the edge, but it’s still a heck of a lot of CO2 spewed into the atmosphere. And that number doesn’t even include the fleet of diesel powered support vehicles that accompany each racing team at every event around the country.

NASCAR has been mildly cooperative in making its sport more “green.” In 2011, they introduced an ethanol based additive, E15, into the racing fuel. This increased the power generated by the fuel, but it did so by reducing efficiency significantly.

Beyond just the fuel, NASCAR cars go through a lot of tires. In fact, each team uses approximately 8-10 sets of tires per weekend. The tires are made primarily with synthetic rubber and therefore require oil to produce. According to the Rubber Manufacturers Association, it takes about 7 gallons of oil to make one tire.

Assuming we have the 40 racers we had when we looked at fuel consumption, and, conservatively, 8 sets of tires per racer, then NASCAR uses about 8,960 gallons of oil per race weekend on tires alone. Its a little tough to tell how much CO2 is emitted when oil is burned, but one estimate places the number at about 317 kg (or 698.86 lbs) per barrel. That amounts to roughly 149,090 lbs of CO2 emitted into the air per weekend.

Again, that number doesn’t take into account any of the support vehicles needed to make the races happen, just the actual race cars.

When taking into account all the other factors that aren’t unique to this sport — the cars the fans drive to the game/race, the air travel, the TV crews, the land used for stadiums/racetracks, the lights — it’s clear just how much impact NASCAR has on the environment.

Does that mean we need to stop it? Of course not.


NASCAR is exciting. The cars go extremely fast and the action is non-stop. The sport shouldn’t be abolished any more than baseball, hockey, or football. Instead, the leadership at NASCAR should take car racing’s energy use seriously and consider new ways to grow the sport and entertain fans — all while helping develop new, less energy-intensive technologies.

By. Max Frankel

Max Frankel is a senior at Vassar College and an intern at the Center for American Progress.

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • spacecase0 on June 27 2012 said:
    I think that nascar has saved total oil usage buy the research it has caused and trickeled it's way into regular cars, not that that matters much in if we keep it or not, but racing research makes our cars safer and more efficient. this is why I would like to see more unlimited racing or at least limits that resemble nature (like fuel or air limits) and I think we would get way more benifit and still have all the fun of racing to watch, to bad nascar bans things like turbochargers that can really help with better milage if done correct.
  • Mel Tisdale on June 28 2012 said:
    Missing from the list of consumption figures is the increased fuel consumption by the fans when they get all excited by what they have just seen, or about to see, and drive accordingly. I imagine that such driving causes a significant increase in CO2 emissions.

    I see no reason to ban NASCAR, after all, life is for living. But it would be nice if they could do something to encourage more economical, and thus less polluting, driving techniques. Though that is going to be difficult, seeing as one of the biggest draws in any motor race is the noise of the engines and they only make a real noise when working hard and to hell with the pollution.

    While climate change is far more serious than many imagine it to be, especially if they listen to those politicians who care more about their votes than their children and grandchildren, there are a lot of ways to cut CO2 emissions before we are forced to consider banning such things as NASCAR.

    Though if we delay taking action much longer, NASCAR will have to change dramatically. I just hope that its fans can see the urgency of the issue and support acting to combat climate change now, if only to preserve their sport.
  • Enviro Equipment Blog on June 29 2012 said:
    Forget about NASCAR's impact on the environment, I'd like to know what impact global warming will have on hockey?

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News