• 20 mins Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 3 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 4 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 5 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 7 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 8 hours New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 10 hours Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 11 hours Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 17 hours Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 22 hours British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 1 day Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 1 day Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 1 day Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 1 day OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 1 day London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 1 day Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 1 day Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 2 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 2 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 2 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 2 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 3 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 3 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 3 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 3 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 3 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 3 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 3 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 3 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 4 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 4 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 4 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 4 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 4 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 7 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Leaked Memo Reveals Trump’s Energy Priorities

Trump speech

The major news out of Trumpland this week was his selection of ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson to lead the State Department. Tillerson has sparked a bit of backlash, mainly revolving around his close relationship with Russia and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Indeed, ExxonMobil has some high-profile drilling projects at stake – Exxon could presumably proceed with a major project in the Russian Arctic if U.S. sanctions on Russia were removed, which should present some conflicts of interest during Tillerson’s confirmation hearings.

But while Tillerson will likely catch all the headlines this week, a much less publicized leaked memo from the Trump camp will likely prove to be more news-worthy. The Center for Media and Democracy got its hands on an internal memo from Thomas Pyle, who was selected to lead the transition team for matters related to the Department of Energy. The memo, which was written before Pyle was appointed to the transition team, details some agenda items for the Trump administration, and they will mark a huge departure from the Obama era and will upend longstanding U.S. energy policy if they implemented. Because Pyle is now working with the Trump transition team, the memo can be viewed as roadmap of sorts for energy policy priorities for the next few years.

Some of the items are predictable given Trump’s clear position on supporting oil and gas drilling and his opposition to efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For example, the Pyle memo says that Trump will withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, “hit the reset” on the Clean Power Plan, and increase leasing for oil and gas drilling on public lands. Related: After Burning Himself On The OPEC Deal: Gartman Says ‘’Buy Oil’’

But there are a few nuggets in the memo worth noting that might not be immediately obvious to those trying to discern what the Trump administration will mean for the energy industry (to read the full memo, click here). Trump could accelerate the approval of LNG export terminals, which is particularly relevant because just this week FERC denied a request by developers of the proposed Jordan Cove LNG export terminal on the West Coast to rehear their case. FERC rejected a permit for the LNG export facility earlier this year on grounds that the project’s detriment to landowners outweighed the potential benefits of the project. The project would see U.S. natural gas, likely from Colorado, exported to Asia.

While the Trump administration has been expected to open up more federal lands for drilling, the Pyle memo singled out the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, the Atlantic Ocean, the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPRA), and federal lands in the Western U.S. The Arctic was just put off limits in the Interior Department’s five-year plan for 2017-2022. The Atlantic is also off limits for now. And western lands have thought to be on the list for development in the coming years under Trump; his selection for who will lead the Interior Department will be relevant for all of these issues.

A more radical move to undo U.S. climate policy would be to reconsider the “endangerment finding,” which the Pyle memo lays out. The endangerment finding was the determination by the EPA early on in the Obama administration that greenhouse gas emissions pose a threat to the public, which was used as the legal basis for regulations on CO2 in a variety of sectors – from the EPA’s Clean Power Plan to the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards for passenger vehicles. Undoing the endangerment finding could strip the federal government of a lot of its tools to attack climate change and would be a boon for the industry. Related: Legit OPEC Cuts To End Global Oil Glut In H1 2017

The Pyle memo also says that the Trump administration will look at the environmental effects of wind energy, which means restricting wind power because of its effects on birds and wildlife. It is curious that the administration would suddenly be concerned about the environment when it pertains to wind and not oil and gas, but the move would be consistent with the incoming government’s efforts to boost fossil fuel over other forms of energy.

In a move that might be a bit more predictable than the rest, given Trump’s public statements, the memo places a priority on building more pipelines. Just a few days ago, Trump said that he would make a decision “fairly soon” on reviving the Keystone XL and Dakota Access Pipelines. His administration would streamline permitting, where it can, on new pipeline projects.

To enact this agenda, Trump has selected the most pro-industry cabinet out of any administration in recent memory: Tillerson at State; Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt for EPA; former Texas Governor at the Department of Energy; and the handful of candidates for the all-important Interior Department all support more development.

In recent days the Trump team has also sent a letter to the Department of Energy, asking for names of staff that worked on climate change, raising fears within the agency about a witch hunt. Staff are worried about a purge of people working on climate.

As it stands right now, there are few hurdles standing in the way of most of the agenda items in the Pyle memo.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • JohnSmart on December 14 2016 said:
    This is what people voted for. They've given Trump a mandate and they shouldn't be surprised when he enacts his mandate. This will either be a lesson in getting what you paid for.

    People seemed to be worried about what kind of planet they were going to be leaving their children (as they drive their big V8 pickup trucks) and now they only care about 'member berries and "making "Murica great again".

    It would be great if they could learn their lesson without 4 years of insanity.
    Trump put a guy in charge of the EPA that has wanted to dismantle it.
    He put Rick Perry in charge of the Energy Dept. Perry couldn't even remember the name of this department and he also wants to dismantle it.

    Good luck America, you're going to need it.
  • Jonathan on December 14 2016 said:
    I'm personally very worried. I didn't vote for this clown. He is a danger to everyone. I'm just hoping the republic survives his presidency. I miss Obama already.
  • Chris on December 14 2016 said:
    Jonathan:::Obama train wreck leaves the station on Jan.20/2017. Just make sure to purchase one way ticket and get on board......and close the door behind you. Bon voyage...LOL.
  • mulp on December 14 2016 said:
    The point of leasing Federal offshore is to pump up big oil share prices, not to produce more oil and gas. The last thing big oil wants is more oil and gas production. They want less which means shutting down the hundreds of drillers on private land who can get into exploration with a few million, and into production for perhaps a hundred million. Big oil needs the entry cost to be a minimum of a billion, and deals with governments cost billions.

    Trump is correct that high tariffs will create jobs in the US, so he should immediately impose a $50 a barrel tariff on imported oil. If he did so, all the jobs lost from the cratering price of oil two years ago would be recovered in six months, and US oil production would rapidly increase 50% making the US energy independent.

    That would be bad for EXXON but great for the smaller US oil and gas companies who would employ far more US workers.
  • Jeff Dallas on December 14 2016 said:
    Trump admin wont go after wind, except in reducing subsidies to make the energy markets more of a level playing field.

    The rest, such as exporting natural gas and drilling on federal lands and rolling back economy-smotherinv environmental regulations? You bet.

    This economy will be rocking and rolling again and the people need it badly after these last 8 years. The environment will look and test out exactly the same. Trust me ive been doing environmnetal science including monitoring for over 20 years. Most part, enviro regulations only change the economy not pollution levels or extent.
  • Jonathan Brilliance on December 14 2016 said:
    This is what the people voted for, the real people and not the dead people and the illegal aliens who voted. It is what they expected and what they demand.

    Wind and solar power cannot survive without government mandates, subsidies, loan guarantees, and nonsensical EPA rules of economic destruction.

    The people did indeed vote for a reckoning against government agencies acting far above their constitutional authority, and will happen.
  • Cowpoke on December 15 2016 said:
    More Winning!! Love It. Go Trump, Go America..

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News