• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 5 hours Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 9 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 13 days What fool thought this was a good idea...
  • 2 days The U.S. Is Determined to Revolutionize Its Microchip Industry
  • 11 days A question...
BYD Unveils Hybrid Powertrain with 1,250-Mile Range

BYD Unveils Hybrid Powertrain with 1,250-Mile Range

BYD's new hybrid powertrain technology…

The World’s Big Bus Electrification Plan

The World’s Big Bus Electrification Plan

Electric buses are expected to…

Igor Alexeev

Igor Alexeev

Igor Alexeev is a Russian journalist and blogger for Strategic Culture Foundation, The Energy Collective and Route Magazine. He writes on the oil and gas…

More Info

Premium Content

Kiev Should Stop Playing Politics With Gas Debt

Kiev Should Stop Playing Politics With Gas Debt

Ukraine’s energy system can stay afloat only as long as the country’s underground gas-storage facilities are full. But by the end of the year the government in Kiev may start siphoning off natural gas destined for the European market.

The issue of natural gas has divided European opinion on the civil war in Ukraine. Brussels’ plan to force EU members into “energy solidarity” with the disintegrating state of Ukraine and to use illegal reversed gas flows is losing support. “The EU has no intention of repaying Ukraine’s debts for Russian gas,” said Dominique Ristori, the director general of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Energy, adding that all debt problems should be settled through the International Monetary Fund.

The reference to the IMF is worthy of note. According to the Fund’s official statements, it will offer assistance to Kiev only if President Petro Poroshenko’s “Drang nach Osten” in the Donbass region is successful. Therefore, the end result of the civil war may affect Ukraine’s ability and willingness to pay its debts. The IMF has also given strict guidelines for Ukraine’s international reserves and has set cash-shortage limits for debt-ridden joint-stock gas company Naftogaz Ukraine.

(The IMF demanded an increase of up to 40 percent in residential gas rates by May 2015. The rates will go up 20 percent  every year until Naftogaz Ukraine’s gas debt has been paid.)

Historically, countries left on their own in talks with the IMF have often found themselves in danger of sovereign default. The IMF today is anything but a welfare institution -- it does not normally assist countries engaged in war.

Ukraine’s government will have to increase domestic gas prices to reach a level on par with the IMF’s standards. This means that in 2015, the Euromaidan babushkas will receive their first 250-euro monthly gas bills. Ukraine’s energy officials often mention their ambitious plans to use fracking or reverse flows from Slovakia and Poland to make up for any gas shortfalls. In reality, the so-called “big gas reverse from Slovakia” would provide for only about 15 percent of Ukraine’s gas needs (after deducting the natural-gas consumption in the Crimea and the Donbass region). In any event, the price of this reversed gas would probably be close to the European contract price.

Related Article: 5 Things Ukraine Must Do To Become Energy Independent

In regard to fracking, Ukraine’s shale projects are either half-dead or have been officially halted. The European Commission is much more skeptical about shale gas than it was two or three years ago. “Shale gas extraction will bring about no significant reduction in Europe's dependence on gas imports,” claimed European Energy Commissioner Günther Oettinger in an interview with B.Z. am Sonntag. Oettinger said that in the long-term future, Europe will be able to cover around one-tenth of its overall need for gas by using fracking technology.

Therefore, the government in Kiev may start siphoning European gas out of Ukraine’s transportation system in order to make up for a shortage of natural gas despite all its solemn promises. The media’s fear mongering will be used to portray social unrest as a threat to national security. Meanwhile, Ukraine’s smart prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, announced his resignation in response to parliament’s failure to pass gas legislation (abandoning the sinking ship of Ukraine’s economy just in time).  

In July, Ukrainian Energy Minister -- and Yatsenyuk’s successor -- Volodymyr Groysman, announced Kiev’s midterm plan. He does not think that either the $5.3 billion Ukraine currently owes for gas or its refusal to make regular payments “will stop Ukraine from buying gas from Russia.” In the light of Ukraine’s newfound European identity, Mr. Groysman should try this tactic during talks on receiving reverse gas supplies from Slovakia and Poland.

However, if the solidarity with Europe plan does not work out, Kiev’s last resort will be its notorious tactic of “taking without paying.”

“We know from experience that in winter and autumn Ukraine needs natural gas. And it may be -- if you’ll forgive me – that they will begin to steal it,” predicts Sergey Ivanov, the chief of staff of the presidential administration of Russia.


The punitive operation in eastern Ukraine has ruined the country’s reputation as a reliable transit route. The recent shoot down of a passenger airliner in Kiev’s zone of control is a sign that it’s actually a zone of chaos, and it’s widening. But the solution to the transit problem, at least, is obvious: Kiev should pay its bills and stop using political arguments in its gas talks.

By Igor Alexeev for Oilprice.com

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • andrey on July 28 2014 said:
    So true...
    In addition to taking hostages, killing civilians, intentionally destroing the infrustructure and bringing down civilian planes russian terrorists make it very hard to develope nat resources in Ukraine.
    Well, what can I say, the rules are clear:
    - ANY autoritarian state makes West it's enemy
    - ANY petrostate is aggressive when oil is high
    priced and minding it's own business when oil is
    - and ALL the neighbours of such a state get worried
    and unite

    Thanks, Igor, for reminding those basics to all of us.
  • Arkadiy on July 28 2014 said:
    Andrey, I kindly ask you to present the proofs you are talking about!
    What is about MH017? Do you know the results of investigation?
    Who does destroy Lugansk and Donetsk? Would you say if it Russia?!
    For sure Ukrainian Army uses heavy military against Ukraine civil population.
    Tell us, please, why the civilians run away from Ukraine to Russia, not to Kiev?
    Do you know Russia opens humanitarian corridors to let to go Ukrainian wounded
    soldiers (not separatists! No! To soldiers from Ukrainian Army).

    And look, why do you blame Russia? Russia did supplied Ukraine with gas till mid of June, BUT UKRAINE DID BLOCKED THE CHANNEL to Crimea and stopped the fresh water flow starting May! Do you know Ukrainian Army uses the systems om volley fire killing the CIVILIANS?! Does it have smthg to do to Russia like petrostate?!

    Nobody in Russia makes West the enemy! If West did not support the military coup
    in Kiev in February, MH017 would not be shoted down, nobody would be killed, and Russia would supply the gas to Ukraine with the price of 286 USD, Moscow would give the loan to Kiev for 18 bln USD, and Viktor Janukovich would be changed by the end of 2014!

    Thanks, Andrey, for reminding
  • andrey on July 29 2014 said:
    If and when, you had the mushrooms growing in you mouth...
    I don't blame Russia, as Russia is a country and the majority of russians are peacefull people. Unfortunatelly, in no so distant past , in 1917, 1939, 1953, when at around 17 million people were murdered in one way or another,the peacefull majority didn't matter.

    So RF establishment should be held responsible.

    When GRU officer posts that the plain were brought down without knowing that it was a civilian plain and removes the post later, you don't start looking for the tiny missle parts at huge territory, assembling it, matching serial number to the record in the storage and wonder if the rocket is missing.You take a stand.
    When a thief, that shits in the golden w.c. pan, is ousted and professional terrorists and recruited former army men are sent to occupy the territory of the other country, release criminals from prisons and handle them guns, you don't listen to the stories of how Crimea was always part of Russia, how russians in Ukraine are in danger and how the shelter is kindly provided to the refugies of war, that Russian establishment itself started. You take a stand.

    So whoever West is for you, it has a moral obligation to take a stand.

    Ukraine has to pay for it's gas and Russian establishment has to pay for it's crimes. Let's help both of those transactions to take place.
  • IA on August 18 2014 said:
    to andrey, Arkadiy

    Your comments prove that it is almost impossible to discuss Ukrainian energy crisis online in a neutral way. The plane crash story, the Crimea status and other "hot topics" are very far from the gist of the article: gas bills should be paid. That's all, folks. It has nothing to do with your beloved political battles.

    to andrey

    Allegations and radical nationalism just don't work. If you are a citizen of Ukraine, I recommend you to take a quick break and refrain from Ukraine's national media (at least for a while).

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News