• 3 minutes Nucelar Deal Is Dead? Iran Distances Itself Further From ND, Alarming Russia And France
  • 5 minutes Don Jr. Tweets name Ukraine Whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella. Worked for CIA during Obama Administration, Hold over to Trump National Security Counsel under Gen McCallister, more . . . .
  • 9 minutes Shale pioneer Chesepeak will file bankruptcy soon. FINALLY ! The consolidation begins
  • 12 minutes China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 13 hours Science: Only correct if it fits the popular narrative
  • 6 hours Crazy Stories From Round The World
  • 22 mins EU has already lost the Trump vs. EU Trade War
  • 16 hours Iran Burning: Shock Gas Price Hike Triggers Violent Protests After Subsidy Cuts
  • 5 hours Impeachment Nonsense
  • 1 day Do The World's Energy Policies Make Sense?
  • 7 hours Everything You Need To Know About Trump
  • 1 day What are the odds of 4 U.S. politicians all having children working for Ukraine Gas Companies?
  • 2 days China's Renewables Boom Hits the Wall
  • 16 hours Atty General Barr likely subpeona so called whistleblower and "leaker" Eric Ciaramella
  • 2 days Forget out-of-date 'dirty oil' smear, Alberta moving to be world's cleanest oil industry
  • 2 days Water, Trump, and Israel’s National Security
  • 1 day Who writes this stuff? "Crude Prices Swing Between Gains, Losses"

Breaking News:

Russia Plans To Boost Crude Oil Exports

Alt Text

OPEC Output Soars As Venezuela Bounces Back From The Brink

Despite Saudi overcompliance and political…

Alt Text

Megamerger Could Create The Next Deepwater Oil Giant

Offshore oilfield service companies Saipem…

Alt Text

Worrying Data For OPEC

OPEC’s latest edition of its…

Joao Peixe

Joao Peixe

Joao is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Keystone XL Proposed Launch Delayed to 2016

Canadian pipeline giant TransCanada Corp. (TRP) has delayed the start date for the planned Keystone XL pipeline for a second time this year to 2016, as approval from Washington for the controversial project is still pending.

The Keystone XL pipeline-which would run from Alberta’s oil sands to the US Gulf Coast--will take at least two years to complete once approval is granted, and TransCanada is now expecting the green light early next year.  

The Canadian company is now building the southern leg of Keystone XL, which does not cross the US border and does not require presidential approval.

Related articles: 1,300 Mile Bike Path to Turn Keystone XL into Tourist Attraction?

For the northern leg of Keystone from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico, the US Department of State has commissioned an environmental study to determine how the pipeline might negatively impact the climate.

However, as the start date for Keystone continues to be pushed back, the estimated costs of the project continue to rise.

On Tuesday, 19 November, TransCanada raised its preliminary cost estimate for Keystone XL to at least $5.4 billion--$100 million more than its earlier estimate.  

This estimate could rise further, according to TransCanada.

"That number will rise and we'll firm that up as we get clarity on exact timing," Don Marchand, TransCanada's chief financial officer, said at the company's annual investor day in Toronto on Tuesday.

Related articles: How an EU-US Free Trade Agreement will Affect the Energy Sector

TransCanada shares were down 53 Canadian cents to C$46.77 by midafternoon on the Toronto Stock Exchange when the company announced the increased cost estimate.

TransCanada has been waiting five years for approval from Washington for this controversial project, which environmental groups say would promote development of oil sands that release more greenhouse gases during production and refining that other forms of oil.  

Canada is pushing strongly for the project to promote growth within its own energy sector.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • William King on November 23 2013 said:
    Why is there no mention of the tremendous Chinese investments in the tar sands? Could it be that then the discussion would have to move from just being about American oil and also American jobs for the pipeline? Also, why is this play being called the oil sands rather than the tar sands. Could it be that there is a desire to ignore that it takes even another energy source to convert the tar sands to oil?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play