• 5 minutes Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 28 mins WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 7 hours Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 3 hours Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 1 min Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 4 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 6 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 7 hours Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 5 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 3 hours Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 21 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 21 hours California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 10 hours Again Google: Brazil May Probe Google Over Its Cell Phone System
  • 10 hours Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
Alt Text

Are The Saudis Involved In The Tesla Buyout Plan?

Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Trending Discussions

JPMorgan Settles Energy Price Fix for $410M

JPMorgan Settles Energy Price Fix for $410M

JPMorgan Chase & Co. has settled with the federal government for $410 million for charges that it manipulated energy markets in California and Michigan between 2010 and 2011.

Of the $410 million, the state of California will get $124 million, and the rest will go to the US Treasury.

Ratepayers in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator will receive $1 million to settle charges JPMorgan also manipulated the power market in the Midwest.

Related article: Why Oil is Good for Real Estate

The banking giant was accused of manipulating energy prices in Michigan and California to make money-losing power plants appear more profitable to investors—and now it faces penalties from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which regulates the sale of electricity. The two states paid an estimated $83 million more than they would have without the manipulation.

JPMorgan continues to deny any wrongdoing.

The scandal heated up in November, when FERC imposed a temporary, 6-month ban on JPMorgan’s ability to trade physical power at market-based rates, beginning in April this year. The reason: The bank failed to disclose information to FERC and the California authorities during the market manipulation investigation. JPMorgan blew off the ban with a shrug.

This is the second house to go down (not literally, of course because they can handle the fines) for energy price manipulation. Earlier this month, Barclays (LON:BARC) was fined $453 million and four of the bank’s traders were separately fined $18 million for energy price rigging in the Western US between 2006 and 2008.

Related article: Why Oil is Good for Real Estate

The Barclay’s fine was a record fine levied by the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for energy market manipulation. Trader Scott Connelly was fined $15 million, while Karen Levine, Ryan Smith and Daniel Brin were fined $1 million each. The four traders have now left Barclays.

FERC has also ordered Barclays to give up $34.9 million in profits to dole out to programs that assist low-income homeowners to pay their energy bills in the states of California, Arizona, Oregon and Washington—where energy markets were manipulated.

Barclays continues to deny the allegations. Last year, Barclays was fined £290 million by UK and US regulators for attempting to rig the interbank lending interest rate, LIBOR.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News