• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 1 day Does Toyota Know Something That We Don’t?
  • 4 days OPINION: Putin’s Genocidal Myth A scholarly treatise on the thousands of years of Ukrainian history. RCW
  • 22 hours World could get rid of Putin and Russia but nobody is bold enough
  • 58 mins America should go after China but it should be done in a wise way.
  • 4 days CHINA Economy IMPLODING - Fastest Price Fall in 14 Years & Stock Market Crashes to 5 Year Low
  • 3 days China is using Chinese Names of Cities on their Border with Russia.
  • 4 days Russian Officials Voice Concerns About Chinese-Funded Rail Line
  • 3 days CHINA Economy Disaster - Employee Shortages, Retirement Age, Birth Rate & Ageing Population
  • 9 days huge-deposit-of-natural-hydrogen-gas-detected-deep-in-albanian-mine
  • 4 days Putin and Xi Bet on the Global South
  • 4 days "(Another) Putin Critic 'Falls' Out Of Window, Dies"
  • 5 days United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 5 days Biden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs

Breaking News:

Chicago Files Suit Against Big Oil

Can Hydrogen Cars Compete With EVs?

Can Hydrogen Cars Compete With EVs?

Hydrogen emerges as a promising…

A Ban on LNG Exports Could Boost Carbon Emissions

A Ban on LNG Exports Could Boost Carbon Emissions

President Biden’s recent decision to…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Premium Content

Is This The Next Big Threat For Oil Investors?

Investors have a hidden risk ahead of them. Even as the market sits near all-time highs, the DOL’s (Department of Labor) new Fiduciary Rule threatens to upend the investing industry, and in the extreme, perhaps destroy many active manager’s businesses. This is especially true in sectors that have a lot of retail participation like the energy sector.

The fundamental issue with the new DOL rule is that it forces advisors to act as fiduciaries, which in turn will lead many advisors to try and play it safe by only recommending the lowest cost investment products such as basic plain vanilla index funds. That in turn could cut off investment advice available to individual investors, creating problems in sectors like energy which are complex and require special knowledge of industry metrics.

There is nothing wrong with being cheap and trying to save a buck, but the problem is that choosing only the lowest cost investment vehicles forces investors to give up slightly more expensive investment options that are still very much worthwhile – like selectively investing in those energy stocks which are most poised to benefit from the rebound in energy prices.

For instance, international stock ETFs like those for Russia are almost always more expensive than domestic equity ETFs. That’s understandable because international stocks are more expensive to trade. Yet advisors concerned about mitigating lawsuit risk and meeting a fiduciary obligation might push investors give up potential upside associated with energy power house Russia in exchange for the regulatory safety of a defensible holding in pure U.S. equities. That would be a costly long-run error for the investor though – at the end of the day, while international stocks in places like Russia can be volatile, they still serve a valuable diversification purpose in one’s portfolio.

Investors certainly should not be paying higher fees for mutual funds and investment advisors that do not perform. The problem with the new rule is that advisors may begin advocating that all of their clients put their portfolio into the lowest cost ETF without considering the upside that goes along with strategies like trend following in sectors like energy. It’s unclear if the bulk of advisors are willing to take the risk of doing what’s right for their client in the long-run at the risk of the short-run. All investment strategies have ups and downs, and advisors telling clients to pursue a more-expensive strategy that ends up suffering in the short-run (even though it should outperform in the long run), may face client wrath. Related: OPEC Head: Oil Inventories Already Dropping From High Levels

For advisors, the way to put out this fire (and protect their own business), is through investor education. Investors need to understand what they are paying for and they need to have clear expectations about the value being provided by premium investment research and advising.

The reality is that the average individual investor earns a return of roughly 4 percent in their portfolio over time according to the best studies on the topic. That abysmal return is despite a market that has an average return of 10.8 percent since 1949. The reason individual investors do so badly is that they get emotional and trade too often buying into the market when it is highest, and selling when it is lowest. This happened in energy in the oil price crash most recently.

One role of advisors in the future should be to keep clients from making that mistake. Helping investors stay the course and avoid panicking when markets like oil turn down is a valuable service. To help investors make the right long-term choices though, advisors are going to have to withstand the pressure to move to all vanilla indexing.

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com


More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Scott on January 22 2017 said:
    Investors choose index funds because they got tired of fund managers holding their wealth hostage for alternative revenue streams that only the managers would enjoy. The recession showed that. Lots of people wouldn't back out of retirement funds for fear of fees and penalties and lost way more while fund managers told them to wait it out. Index (passive) funds were the back lash. The fiduciary rule is in place to actually help public sentiment and reckless funds. Its often referred to as anti free market but it promotes free market for investors because they are now open to more investment opportunities and this creates competiiton in the market for managing wealth. You pointed out the 4% figure for individual investors which is probably true for a lot but I see major retirement funds that are performing at that level as well. Some of us indivual investors constantly out perform the indices and that's what people want. They want managers to work much harder for their investments rather than just picking up a load fee and risking pools of money with risky securities that could possibly wipe out their savings or not share in any of those rewards (including bets against their own investments). That's what the fiduciary rule is about. Large money market account and invesment firms are already changing the way they charge investors to counter the migration of their clients to passive funds. Thats how you gain back trust and clients. Investors were way ahead of the fudiciary rule and many are happy with their returns and fees. Oil is in no risk of losing investments. After all, whats in a good portion of those index funds? Energy stocks, even in the sustainable energy funds. I think all the active and passive fund competition will actually increase the invesment balance sheet of America and the rest of the world. Yes they will have cycles, just as we do in picking value and growth stocks for example. People have way more opportunities to invest their wealth these days and that will help all sectors including oil, especially with the new administration coming in.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News