• 4 hours British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 8 hours Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 10 hours Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 11 hours Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 12 hours OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 13 hours London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 14 hours Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 17 hours Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 23 hours India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 1 day Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 1 day Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 2 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 2 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 2 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 2 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 2 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 3 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 3 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 3 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 3 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 3 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 3 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 3 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 3 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 4 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 4 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 4 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 6 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 6 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 7 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 7 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 7 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 7 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 7 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 7 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 7 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 7 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 8 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
Alt Text

What’s Stopping An Oil Price Rally?

Oil prices rallied in Q3…

Alt Text

The New Challenger To Lithium Batteries

The lithium-ion battery is head…

Alt Text

Are Combustion Engines Reaching Peak Demand?

As countries announce plans to…



IWPR helps people in the world's most challenging environments have the information they need to drive positive changes in their lives — holding government to…

More Info

Iraqi Provinces Angered by Energy Auctions Which May Have Violated the Iraqi Constitution

Iraqi Provinces Angered by Energy Auctions Which May Have Violated the Iraqi Constitution

The oil ministry’s auction of three natural gas fields this week have been angrily opposed by all the governorates in which they are located, with provincial officials threatening legal action against Baghdad and warning that they will refuse to cooperate with the developers.

Bids were granted to companies from Turkey, Kuwait, Kazakstan and South Korea to develop gas fields holding approximately ten per cent of the country’s reserves. The fields in Anbar, Diyala and Basra are primarily being developed for domestic consumption to improve Iraq’s feeble power supply, oil ministry officials said.

But provincial council members maintain the oil ministry overstepped its bounds – and may have violated the constitution – by holding the auction without consulting local officials. The provinces say they want more control over their natural resources and assurances that the developments will benefit their economies.

The dispute reflects ongoing tensions between local authorities and Baghdad over management of the country’s vast natural resources. The proposed hydrocarbons law, drafted in 2007, regulates the management and contracting of natural resources between local and federal authorities – though it has been stalled for years. Parliament was expected to debate the legislation after the March elections, but this has been held up by the bitter political disputes that have left the country without a functioning government.

Iraq has the fourth-largest proven oil reserves in the world, and is believed to have the tenth-largest gas reserves. Most of the country’s natural resources are undeveloped.

In western Anbar governorate, the council is threatening to sue the oil ministry for not consulting local authorities on the auction bid. It says it will not assist the foreign firms that won the right to develop Akkas, a large gas reserve near the Syrian border.

While no laws exist to regulate Iraq’s natural resources, local officials point to Article 109 of the constitution, which mandates that the federal government should manage oil and gas “with the producing governorates and regional governments”.

“The council will not provide any kind of cooperation or support or facilities to those companies that won the bid,” Jasim al-Halbusi, the head of the provincial council, told IWPR.

Asked if there could be attacks on the foreign companies developing the field, Halbusi responded, “The central government will bear the responsibility for ignoring the decision of Anbar’s local government and the demands of Anbar’s people.”

“Signing the contract regarding Akkas gas field without listening to our decision [to refuse the deal] will stoke problems between the local and federal governments.”

Once the centre of the Sunni insurgency, Anbar is now largely controlled by local tribes who defected from groups such as al-Qaeda. Security has improved there since 2007 but remains a major concern, particularly for foreigners.

Oil Minister Hussein al-Shahristani called on local authorities to cooperate with the firms that won the gas field auction, warning that “the government will be very strong and severely punish everyone who hinders development of these contracts”.

Anbar’s provincial council announced its opposition to the auction days before bidding opened in Baghdad. The conflict between Anbar and central government began earlier this year when the oil ministry turned down a proposal by local officials to have a consortium of Turkish and German companies develop Akkas, Mezher Hasan al-Mullah, head of Anbar council’s investment committee, said. The council threatened to reject the oil ministry’s proposals after their own was turned down, Mullah said.

In Diyala and Basra, officials claimed they were never officially notified about the auction. The oil ministry maintains that it has the right to sign development contracts for oil and gas, and that local officials were well aware of the auction, which was originally scheduled for September.

But Ahmed al-Seleti, a member of the Basra provincial council, insisted, “This is an important issue for the province, and we should not be excluded like this. Perhaps after several years we will need another revolution to nationalise oil.”

Sadiq al-Musawi, deputy governor of Diyala, also claimed that the development contracts were illegal because local authorities were not consulted, although he said his council did not intend to take the dispute further. Basra officials said they are to discuss taking action against the oil ministry over the deals.

In addition to threatening to sue the government for not consulting local authorities, Anbar’s provincial council is considering organising demonstrations and may go on strike to protest the oil ministry’s decision, Halbusi said.

Still, Tariq Harb, a member of parliament and a legal expert, said the contracts are “legal and constitutional, and the provinces have no power to object to the contracts or the bid results”.

Thamir al-Ghadban, prime minister Nuri al-Maliki’s oil adviser, said the gas development projects will improve quality of life in the provinces by providing electricity and jobs.

And Jihad, the oil ministry spokesman, said the ministry will discuss the contracts with both local officials and citizens and does not believe security will be a concern, adding, “I don’t think there will any problems.”

But local opposition to the projects is clear. Residents of Basra, Anbar and Diyala said they were angry about the contracts, maintaining that the money would not trickle down to citizens if it was controlled by Baghdad.

“The revenue from the gas will go to Baghdad and the situation here will still be miserable,” said Sheikh Salam Ajmi, a Fallujah tribal leader who participated in a demonstration in the city this week.

Basim Saeed, a 45-year-old teacher in Diyala, said the local government should stop international companies from working in the provinces.

Calling them “vampires who want to suck the blood of locals by making a deal with Baghdad”, he added, “If those firms try to come here and exploit our wealth they will be in trouble and won’t be able to get out of it.”

Reporting by IWPR Iraq senior local editor Abeer Mohammed in Baghdad and IWPR-trained journalist Uthman al-Mukhtar in Fallujah. IWPR-trained journalists Ali Mohammed and Ali Abu Iraq contributed to this report from Diyala and Basra.

By. Abeer Mohammed and Uthman al-Mukhtar

This article originally appeared in IWPR.net and is produced by the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, www.iwpr.net

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News