• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 3 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 25 mins The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 5 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 15 mins Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 10 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 3 hours Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 15 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 14 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 3 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 14 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 16 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
  • 23 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 6 hours < sigh > $90 Oil Is A Very Real Possibility
Alt Text

Exxon’s Shocking Supply And Demand Predictions

Exxon has a announced some…

Alt Text

Goldman: Trade War Won't Crash Oil Prices

In spite of the impact…

Alt Text

Can China Afford To Slap Tariffs On U.S. Oil?

China’s latest round of tariffs…

Leonard Brecken

Leonard Brecken

Leonard is a former portfolio manager and principal at Brecken Capital LLC, a hedge fund focused on domestic equities. You can reach Leonard on Twitter.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Inflated EIA Data Could Keep Oil Prices Subdued Next Year

Inflated EIA Data Could Keep Oil Prices Subdued Next Year

It is indisputable that central bank mandates have morphed from just employment/inflation managers to all out asset class manipulators.

One may argue what assets classes those are but it’s pretty clear that anything is up for grabs. The whims of central bank policies are directly affecting equity and bond markets. The trend has been underway for some time – the Fed has increased its hand in the economy over the past decade so it is no wonder that the Fed seems to have a mandate to prop up certain asset classes while depressing others.

The fact that we have come to this in U.S. after two bubbles isn’t surprising. Related: Strippers Suffering From Low Oil Prices

What is surprising is the extent to which investors not only adhere to this mentality but assist in it. We all know the adage “don’t fight the Fed,” which has been a longstanding unwritten Wall Street law so to speak. But what is now occurring is that Wall Street is following the Fed with disregard to underlying fundamentals.

Yes, there are some investors showing caution, but there are too many investors running with the Fed, which cause enormous swings in the price of different assets. We witness this daily as either prices crash on shorting or jump on short covering. Again the measure of the distortion level is the disparity and inverse relationship of commodities and NASDAQ, which continues despite record low valuations and short interest in one and very high valuations on the other. Money managers have not hid the fact that they are long on beta and short on energy, nor are they shy in piling in the most crowded trade in history: being long on the dollar knowing the U.S. economy is weakening, solely driven by the Fed’s desire to end ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) and because the EU is printing money like mad. They are doing this knowing full well the oil supply story will end as hedges roll off in 2016 and oil remains far below the free cash flow break-even point.

Production is poised to plunge regardless of near term noise from OPEC or any other conjured up media hype to depress commodities. The fact is beyond the day-to-day noise it’s the dollar that is driving things and will continue to regardless of fundamentals in 2016. Related: OPEC Isn’t Dead. It’s Shifting Strategies

I suspect that despite the high probability of U.S. production declines imminently and the restatement of supply and demand by EIA/IEA to more accurately reflect a much smaller oil imbalance than perceived, it will be the dollar that drives prices. In fact today the EIA raised its demand growth for oil in U.S. to 160,000 barrels per day in 2016 from 120,000 barrels per day despite 2015 being 300,000 barrels per day. Unless there is a recession why would demand wane by that much when larger cars are being sold I ask?

On top of this they cut their projection for production levels in 2016 by 570,000 barrels per day, a larger decrease from the previous 520,000 barrels per day. But these figures could still be understating the case.

Take Kinder Morgan, for example, which just announced a 75 percent cut to its dividend, which will open the door to other MLPs on reducing or eliminating dividends. This will have an extraordinary impact on the returns for investors – we are talking billions payouts to investors using MLP’s to supplement income. Kinder Morgan alone pays out $5 billion in dividend income! Investors were burned once by the dramatic fall in equity, but now a virtual elimination of dividend income. But for companies, this will offset the effects of lower oil, helped also by reductions in capex and layoffs.

The MLP space largely worked through the 2008-2009 financial crisis without cutting dividends. This time they won’t be quite as lucky despite the common belief that the economy is good. The systemic rise in debt due to easy money has increased the problem from 2008 and Kinder Morgan’s problems are just one example of it. Related: How Electricity Markets Could be Upended by this Supreme Court Decision

Once the charade of propping the economy up through easy money gimmick plays out (and it is beginning to do so as we speak) all the debt piled on by governments and corporations alike will get exposed. The Fed raising rates only accelerates that process.

Still, there is a chance that none of this matters because something else could crop up in 2016 that will mask this upward pressure on prices, whether it be the dollar or Iran or something else to depress oil. Until OPEC forces prices higher or the Fed changes policy, prices probably won’t recover. By 2017 the same bearish media will reverse course as the dollar bubble bursts. Plenty of reasons will be invented to justify these events but no one will admit that the entire asset class distortion that is ongoing is tied to central bankers broadening their mandates and using any means to manipulate assets prices to prop up economies that are now swimming in debt.

Central banks are manipulating equity prices by 20 to 30 percent on the upside, and the same amount for commodities on the downside. But they can’t have it both ways. Sooner or later the house of cards will come tumbling down.

By Leonard Brecken for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • Amvet on December 12 2015 said:
    I think that there is no global oil production glut.
    (1) The majority of oil is produced by developing countries. (2) The majority of oil is used by developing countries. (3) Global demand is increasing. Chinese imports up 8.7% Jan-Nov this year. There is no evidence that global production is increasing. (4) An EIA study of 1,600 oil fields that produce 70% of global production showed a decline rate of 6.2% per year.
    90 million bpd x 70% x 6.2% = 3.9 million bpd. So at least 4 million bpd of new production per year is needed. Where are they ???
    Having a storage increase in the US caused by an import surge and having the Saudis cutting the oil price does not mean there is a global surplus but these are dishonestly used to claim a surplus.
    Look at history:
    1994 oil price crash caused by massive shorts.
    1997-98 oil price crash. 700 million bbls were said to be produced but were never found.
    2001-02 oil price crash. 445 million bbls were said to be produced but were never found.
    2015 Production over reported. Demand growth ignored.
  • Henry Hughes on December 12 2015 said:
    Thank you for one more GREAT article!
  • Jack Naneek on December 14 2015 said:
    This is a poorly written piece that makes little sense. My high schooler could have written a more coherent essay. What is the author saying? On the one hand, production is decline and demand is growing? On the other, none of this matters because of bearish media and central banks? And it's all manipulation by the bearish media?? What?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News