• 3 minutes Is Pete Buttigieg emerging as the most likely challenger to Trump?
  • 5 minutes Can LNG Kill Oil?
  • 8 minutes Question: Why are oil futures so low through 2020?
  • 11 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 19 hours “The era of cheap & abundant energy is long gone. Money supply & debt have grown faster than real economy. Debt saturation is now a real risk, requiring a global scale reset.”"We are now in new era of expensive unconventional energy
  • 33 mins CoV-19: China, WHO, myth vs fact
  • 7 hours Question - What if there are no buyers for Chevron's Appalachia Assets?
  • 47 mins Blowout videos
  • 21 hours Energy from thin air?
  • 1 day OIL trades as if the virus is a 1 quarter event. As if it's Containable, Reversible and Temporary. Is it ?
  • 1 day Hey NYC - Mayor De Blasio declares you must say goodbye to fossil fuels. Get ready to freeze your Virtue Signaling butts off.
  • 2 hours Natural Gas
  • 2 days Fast-charging, long-running, bendy energy storage breakthrough
  • 2 days Foxconn cancelled the reopening of their mfg plants scheduled for tomorrow. Rescheduled to March 3rd. . . . if they're lucky.
  • 2 days "For the Public's Interest"
  • 6 hours Cheap natural gas is making it very hard to go green
Alt Text

Can’t Afford An EV? You’re Paying For It Anyway

Perhaps the best arguments of…

Alt Text

Brazil’s Oil Production Jumps 20% To New Record In January

Brazil’s oil production jumped by…

Alt Text

The Complete Guide To Oxygenates

Oxygenates are chemical compounds such…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Premium Content

How the Super Committee's Failure Could Harm Energy Technology Development

After three months of meetings, discussions and political squabbling, the Congressional “super committee” burdened with the task of reducing the US federal budget by $1.5trillion over the next ten years has failed to agree on a suitable plan.
 
In a last ditch meeting, the Montana Senator Max Barcus gave his opinion about the likelihood of a deal, “There’s always hope.” It speaks volumes about the state of confidence in the Congress that no one believed it.
 
US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta said he had "never been so concerned" about the ability of lawmakers to solve the nation's problems in his four decades of public service.
 
The committee co-chairs Senator Patty Murray and Representative Jeb Hensarling said in a statement that, "Despite our inability to bridge the committee's significant differences, we end this process united in our belief that the nation's fiscal crisis must be addressed and that we cannot leave it for the next generation to solve."
 
Brilliant, so what that means is that after several months of discussions they have agreed that something must be done........but they already knew that back in July and still nothing has been done.
 
Exactly what this failure means for the energy sector is unclear at the moment, but the required cuts are so large that major projects and research facilities are likely to face a dangerous lack of investment. In such a young, under-funded industry as renewable energy any cut in government subsidies could threaten the development of promising technologies and delay the progress of a green energy era.
 
Michael Lubell, head of public affairs with the American Physical Society, suggested that, “It’s going to be a real bloodletting.”
 
More than half of the cuts will fall on national security and defence, which could prove crippling to the US army. All other programmes could face an 8% cut, but is unlikely that the cuts will fall evenly; opening the doors for frenzied lobbying of prized projects that could set groups of scientists against one another.
 
It’s hard to say exactly which projects are under the most risk, but the Department of Energy’s system of national laboratories, which cost more than $10 billion a year to run, may face some tough times. The DOE addresses America’s energy, environmental and nuclear challenges through transformative science and technology solutions. Reductions to this department could severely restrict development of more efficient, greener and renewable energy technologies, limiting America’s competitiveness in the market with the Chinese, Germans, and others.
 
In an attempt to reassure markets and ratings agencies President Obama assured that "One way or another, we will be trimming the deficit by at least $2.2 trillion over the next 10 years."
 
The US Energy Sector can still live with the hope that they will continue to receive the necessary financial support from the government, despite the failure of the committee to discover a better resolution to the economic predicament. As Bloomberg News noted “Congress has a history of undoing previous attempts to require debt reduction.”
 
By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News