• 5 minutes Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 8 minutes What Can Bring Oil Down to $20?
  • 14 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 7 mins Alberta govt to construct another WCS processing refinery
  • 4 hours Let's Just Block the Sun, Shall We?
  • 14 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 22 mins Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 15 hours OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 28 mins Quebecans Snub Noses at Alberta's Oil but Buy More Gasoline
  • 19 hours $867 billion farm bill passed
  • 2 days Sleeping Hydrocarbon Giant
  • 2 days Sane Take on the Russia-Ukraine Case
  • 23 hours Contradictory: Euro Zone Takes Step To Deeper Integration, Key Issues Unresolved
  • 20 hours IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 17 hours Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 19 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
Alt Text

The Next Big Development In Offshore Oil & Gas

German tech company Siemens announced…

Alt Text

Qatar’s OPEC Exit May Just Be The Beginning

Qatar shocked markets yesterday with…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Hapless Alberta Takes Action As Oil Prices Crash

Faced with a crisis moving oil out of the country, the provincial government in Alberta is stepping in to purchase trains in order to ease the midstream bottleneck.

Western Canada Select (WCS), the benchmark for heavy oil in Alberta, continues to trade below $15 per barrel, or roughly $40-per-barrel lower than WTI. That is a hefty discount, although slightly narrower than the $50 per barrel discount WCS traded for a few weeks ago.

“It’s worth more in the ground than it is to produce it right now,” Athabasca Oil Corp. CEO Rob Broen said in an interview Wednesday with BNN Bloomberg Television. “These differentials are so extreme.”

The problem for Alberta – and for Canada – is that after a decade of trying, the region is still no closer to building a major oil pipeline to move product to either the United States or to the Pacific Ocean. As pipelines have filled up, the discount has exploded.

Now, the government in Alberta is in talks to purchase enough rail cars to move 120,000 bpd out of the province. Alberta’s Premier Rachel Notley said the deal could be concluded within a few weeks and could cost C$350 million (US$263 million). The provincial government said that the additional rail capacity could narrow the WCS discount by $4 per barrel.

Alberta, as a hopelessly oil-dependent petrostate, is flailing about, looking for a solution to the pipeline bottleneck. Last month, oil sands producers asked the Premier to mandate industry-wide production cuts. Notley’s challenger in next year’s election for premier is now trumpeting his support for mandatory production cuts.

It’s an odd evolution for Notley, who ended decades of rule by the Progressive Conservatives, and as a New Democrat, is decidedly to the left of the longstanding industry-friendly PCs. She even introduced a carbon tax after she took office and moved to shut down coal plants.

But “leftist” in Alberta, if she can be called that, is not the same as leftists everywhere else. After all, the carbon tax was conjured up in order to smooth the path for new pipelines – the logic being that a carbon tax and other incentives to boost renewable energy would buy the “social license” to operate, and might convince the U.S. government to greenlight Keystone XL. Related: The Biggest Winners Of The Oil Price Slump

The green initiatives have done little to advance a new pipeline, even though the Trump administration gave the go-ahead to TransCanada’s long-delayed project. So Notley is now dispensing with the green trade-off and is now using every power at her disposal to support the oil industry, including state-led intervention to buy railcars. She has also aggressively campaigned for pipelines in every direction – she championed the Trans Mountain expansion pipeline that would run west, the Keystone XL pipeline that would run south, and the now-defunct Energy East pipeline that would have run to the east.

Canada’s federal government stepped in to nationalize the Trans Mountain expansion earlier this year, even though its construction remains an open question. Alberta is now looking to buy trains to move oil out of the province. Canada – at both the provincial and federal level – is at the mercy of, and now an active owner in, the oil industry.

Still, the rail cars will take time to procure and bring into operation. According to Reuters, the first 15,000 bpd of rail capacity would not come online until December 2019, and won’t reach the full 120,000 bpd until the following summer – August 2020. Still, there are no other options. If Keystone XL or the Trans Mountain Expansion are ever constructed, those projects will come online well after 2020.

However, the one salvation could be Enbridge’s Line 3 replacement, which is expected to come online late next year or early 2020. “The good news is there is light at the end of the proverbial pipeline,” analysts at Scotiabank wrote in a note on November 21, referring to Enbridge’s Line 3 replacement, which would provide an outlet for 370,000 bpd. “The bad news is that Line 3 is still at least a year away. Between now and next winter the Western Canadian oil market is at the mercy of rail schedulers and their attempts to mobilize more locomotives, tank cars, and trained crews—an effort that has thus far proved insufficient to clear the market.” Related: Goldman: Oil Prices Set For Rebound In 2019

Alberta estimates the province is currently over-producing by about 250,000 bpd. The capacity addition from the Line 3 replacement is expected to add more than that amount, and since it is scheduled to come online before the rail cars, the whole business of the government buying into rail seems odd. But Notley is unbowed. “Line 3 only clears the market for three months before we find ourselves back in this situation again,” Notley told Maclean’s.

Meanwhile, the addition of $4 per barrel to the price of WCS from new rail capacity is also a relatively small payoff. “Don’t mistake me -- this is not the long-term answer,” Notley said on Wednesday. “It absolutely is not. New pipelines are the long-term answer.”

To reiterate, though, pipelines are not a near-term answer. In the meantime, the WCS discount of around $40 per barrel is probably too much to bear for many oil producers. Some are already voluntarily cutting back. Scotiabank says that a hypothetical 4 percent mandatory production cut (140,000 bpd) could narrow the discount from $40 per barrel to to something like $20 per barrel. That sounds more effective than a provincial-led purchase of rail capacity that will take 18 months to go into effect.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Tom Blazek on November 30 2018 said:
    More Trains, More Dead People at Railroad Crossings. All for $4.00 per barrel. Maybe the $4.00 should go the victims for the crossing accidents.

    All Because a Government is not doing its job.

    What a Joke!

    Kick up a lot of dust, but at the end of the day nothing changes.

    Maybe, Canada needs new Leadership!
  • Rudy de Haas on December 02 2018 said:
    Umm, no

    First, It is my belief that the energy related decisions being made in the Alberta Government are driven by Brian Mason (whom I believe is a dedicated communist) and not Ms. Notley. Mason, I think, is opposed to the oil industry and has been aligning policy with the those of the federal, B.C. and Quebec governments to ensure that no pipelines are built.

    Second, the rail car idea is well beyond stupid if intended to move oil, brilliant if intended to stop the movement of oil because (a) building them in Quebec or Ontario gives money and jobs to areas dominated by politicians already opposed to the industry; and (b) this "solution" spends Alberta tax monies for something that'sboth too small and too far in the future to do any good. So Notley can be seen to be "doing something" while doing nothing and helping the other side.

    Third, there is an obvious, and fast, solution: (see winface.com/smith for more): build two large refineries near the U.S. border, ship only refined product by truck or rail. On a crash build basis, the permits can go through in minutes, construction would take about 18 months - less than the rail cars, million+ bbd capacity, jobs in the west, losses in Quebec, Ontario, and B.C.
  • Nick Tchoudov on December 02 2018 said:
    Our Canadian brothers should build a big pipeline and push the goodies towards us, our US of A... even getting the slime at $15 per barrel will make hard working Americans feel better

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News