• 4 minutes England Running Out of Water?
  • 7 minutes Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 10 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 14 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 4 hours Russian Effect: U.S. May Soon Pause Preparations For Delivering F-35s To Turkey
  • 3 hours China's Expansion: Italy Leads Europe Into China’s Embrace
  • 3 hours Poll: Will Renewables Save the World?
  • 3 hours New Rebate For EVs in Canada
  • 2 hours One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 4 hours Chile Tests Floating Solar Farm
  • 2 hours Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 1 hour 3 Pipes: EPIC 900K, CACTUS II 670K, GREY OAKS 800K
  • 5 hours Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 6 hours The Political Debacle: Brexit delayed
  • 22 hours Trump sells out his base to please Wallstreet and Oil industry
  • 21 hours No Mercy: EU Fines Google $1.7 billion For Abusing Online Ads Market
  • 12 hours Boeing Faces Safety Questions After Second 737 Crash In Five Months
  • 18 hours Oil-sands recovery by solvents has started on a trial basis; first loads now shipped.

Breaking News:

BP Faces Platform Workers’ Strike

Alt Text

Oil Prices Shoot Up On Large Inventory Draw

Oil prices rose on Wednesday…

Alt Text

Why OPEC’s Decision To Delay Makes Sense

OPEC’s decision to maintain the…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Halliburton Reports $3.2 Billion Loss, But Sees Activity Picking Up

Halliburton reported its second quarter earnings on Wednesday, revealing a huge loss of $3.21 billion, or $3.73 per share. That compares to net income of $54 million for the same quarter a year earlier.

It has been a rough two years for the oilfield services industry, although the pain has become more acute in 2016 as drilling activity has ground to a halt. Bloomberg notes that all four major oilfield services companies dipped into negative earnings territory in North America in the first quarter, where much of their business is located.

Halliburton’s bad quarter also reflects a $3.5 billion termination fee that it was forced to pay Baker Hughes for its failed takeover bid. The U.S. government blocked the $28 billion merger on antitrust grounds. Halliburton also took an interest-bearing promissory note from Venezuela in exchange for $200 million in outstanding trade receivables.

Halliburton is curtailing activity in the South American country because of lack of payment. While North America represents nearly half of Halliburton’s revenue, South America is still a substantial slice of its business. The region accounts for more than a tenth of Halliburton’s revenues, and its earnings there fell 22 percent from the first to second quarter.

Nevertheless, Halliburton’s CEO put on a brave face, arguing that not only will the oil markets start to rebound in the near future, but Halliburton is strongly positioned to profit as it has actually gained market share during from competitors because of the down cycle.

“We believe the North America market has turned. We expect to see a modest uptick in rig count during the second half of the year. With our growth in market share during the downturn, we believe we are best-positioned to benefit from any recovery, including a modest one,” Halliburton CEO Dave Lesar said in a statement. “Internationally, we are maintaining our service footprint, managing costs and continuing to gain market share.”

The rig count has indeed climbed over the past two months, a sign that some producers are starting to bring back some drilling activity. Still, with oil prices back down to $45 per barrel, the oilfield services industry is not out of the woods yet.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • G. V. FOREMAN on July 21 2016 said:
    The oil industry “powers” and the majority of “expert analyst” fail to appreciate nor comprehend the bases for the past two years of turmoil in the industry is traceable to one momentous event: amending the 1975 Energy Policy and Conversation Act in 2015 to permit export of U.S. crude oil.
    It is not ironic, the drop in crude oil prices commenced in August, 2014, less than four months after the lobbying effort commenced. One could and should consider this essentially a “shot over the bow” from OPEC. It was OPEC’s way of saying “thank you” to the US for reneging on a 40 year legislative “no compete” agreement. It was OPEC’s signal to US oil operators “if you enter our sandbox, ie, allow US crude oil exports into the global market, there’s going to be hell to pay”. They have and continue to give “us” fair warning. Unfortunately, US operators haven’t taken the “hint”.
    The fact is the US oil industry does not live in a bubble. The fact is OPEC, in the form of the Saudi’s, have a more quantitative and qualitative comprehension of the US oil industry than the US oil companies. The “ugly American” attitude and approach culminated with the official amendment of the 1975 EPCA legislation permitting unfettered US crude oil exports.
    Never being one to oversimplify a single issue, nor “conspiracize” a given issue, I have to make an exception on this particular subject. Everything that has befallen the US oil industry in the past two years can unequivocally be traced to amendment of the 1975 EPCA and the resulting resumption of US oil exports.
    If anyone “thinks” otherwise...then they may need an evaluation of their thought processes.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News