• 4 minutes Tariffs to derail $83.7 Billion Chinese Investment in West Virginia
  • 9 minutes Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 17 minutes Kaplan Says Rising Oil Prices Won't Hurt US Economy
  • 1 min Could Venezuela become a net oil importer?
  • 1 hour Reuters: OPEC Ministers Agree In Principle On 1 Million Barrels Per Day Nominal Output Increase
  • 4 hours Saudi Arabia plans to physically cut off Qatar by moat, nuclear waste and military base
  • 3 hours Tesla Closing a Dozen Solar Facilities in Nine States
  • 5 mins Why is permian oil "locked in" when refineries abound?
  • 4 hours EU Leaders Set To Prolong Russia Sanctions Again
  • 12 hours Battle for Oil Port: East Libya Forces In Full Control At Ras Lanuf
  • 16 hours Teapots Cut U.S. Oil Shipments
  • 44 mins Oil prices going down
  • 7 hours Saudi Arabia turns to solar
  • 7 mins Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 1 hour Could oil demand collapse rapidly? Yup, sure could.
  • 17 hours Hot line, Macron: Phone Calls With Trump Are Like Sausages Best Not To Know What Is Inside
  • 21 hours Russia's Energy Minister says Oil Prices Balanced at $75, so Wants to Increase OPEC + Russia Oil by 1.5 mbpd
  • 4 hours China’s Plastic Waste Ban Will Leave 111 Million Tons of Trash With Nowhere To Go
  • 1 day Corruption On The Top: Netanyahu's Wife Charged With Misuse of Public Funds for Meals
Alt Text

Uncertainty Looms Large Over Latin American Oil

While Venezuela is grabbing a…

Alt Text

The Fed Is Driving Down Oil Prices

The hawkish U.S. Federal Reserve…

Rory Johnston

Rory Johnston

Rory Johnston is a Master of Global Affairs student at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs where he focuses primarily on the…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Exxon Responds to Carbon Asset Risk Concerns

Exxon Responds to Carbon Asset Risk Concerns

Last week I wrote about the emerging investor language of “Carbon Asset Risk” and ExxonMobil’s agreement to publish its plans to deal with the risk of potentially “stranded” assets in a carbon-constrained future. Exxon’s answer arrived Monday with the publication of “Energy and Carbon—Managing the Risks,” a report that outlines the corporation’s views on the risks climate change pose to its assets and the future of its business model.  

In short, Exxon is not too concerned.

The report makes clear that Exxon does not believe the world will meet the emissions reduction targets required to limit global warming to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. It goes on to say that all long-term investments are based on its global outlook for energy, which has explicitly factored in potential future emissions regulation. The report concludes that, “based on this analysis, we are confident that none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will become ‘stranded.’”

Related Article: Exxon Eyes Production at 10 New Projects

This is because Exxon believes that the “low carbon scenario”—the one that sees an 80 percent reduction in global emissions by 2050 and a stabilization of CO2 in the atmosphere at 450 ppm—is unlikely.  It goes as far as saying that not only is it unlikely, but that it is undesirable as the “damaging impact to accessible, reliable and affordable energy resulting from the policy changes such a scenario would produce are beyond those that societies, especially the world’s poorest and most vulnerable, would be willing to bear.” Furthermore, this scenario would require CO2 prices to rise above $200 per ton by 2050, which the report juxtaposes against the current EU price of $8-$10 per ton.

Costs of CO2 for Various Emission Pathways

One of the key concerns behind the carbon asset risk movement was the hundreds of billions of dollars being spent on exploration to buttress reserves that may never be used. However, even under the “450 Scenario” the world would still consume significant volumes of liquid hydrocarbon fuels. As the chart below shows, if firms stop investing in exploration and production maintenance, supply will fall sharply below demand.

Related Article: Geopolitical Turmoil Takes its Toll on ExxonMobil

Liquids Supply/Demand

By this logic, it is clear why Exxon doesn’t seem to worry about the future value of its assets. It has a secure future demand base, even if the environmental community pulls off a miracle and manages an 80 percent emissions reduction by 2050.

A corporation the size of Exxon, with annual revenues exceeding the gross domestic product of 167 countries, has considered every possible threat to its business model, climate change included. This is likely why the turn-around time on Exxon’s response to the carbon asset risk proposal was so short—they already knew their answer.

By Rory Johnston of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • carson on April 03 2014 said:
    I think the firm is purposely downplaying the negative side of the impact!

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News