• 5 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 9 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 15 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 1 hour US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 9 hours Petrol versus EV
  • 1 hour EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 23 mins The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 12 mins WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 3 hours OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 51 mins The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 14 hours E-mopeds
  • 6 hours 10 Incredible Facts about U.S. LNG
  • 3 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 4 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 1 hour A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 1 day These are the world’s most competitive economies: US No. 1
  • 1 day The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
Alt Text

EIA Report Threatens Oil Price Rally

After a very bullish week…

Alt Text

U.S. And Europe Divided On The Future Of Oil

Oil majors in Europe and…

Rory Johnston

Rory Johnston

Rory Johnston is a Master of Global Affairs student at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs where he focuses primarily on the…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Exxon Responds to Carbon Asset Risk Concerns

Exxon Responds to Carbon Asset Risk Concerns

Last week I wrote about the emerging investor language of “Carbon Asset Risk” and ExxonMobil’s agreement to publish its plans to deal with the risk of potentially “stranded” assets in a carbon-constrained future. Exxon’s answer arrived Monday with the publication of “Energy and Carbon—Managing the Risks,” a report that outlines the corporation’s views on the risks climate change pose to its assets and the future of its business model.  

In short, Exxon is not too concerned.

The report makes clear that Exxon does not believe the world will meet the emissions reduction targets required to limit global warming to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. It goes on to say that all long-term investments are based on its global outlook for energy, which has explicitly factored in potential future emissions regulation. The report concludes that, “based on this analysis, we are confident that none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will become ‘stranded.’”

Related Article: Exxon Eyes Production at 10 New Projects

This is because Exxon believes that the “low carbon scenario”—the one that sees an 80 percent reduction in global emissions by 2050 and a stabilization of CO2 in the atmosphere at 450 ppm—is unlikely.  It goes as far as saying that not only is it unlikely, but that it is undesirable as the “damaging impact to accessible, reliable and affordable energy resulting from the policy changes such a scenario would produce are beyond those that societies, especially the world’s poorest and most vulnerable, would be willing to bear.” Furthermore, this scenario would require CO2 prices to rise above $200 per ton by 2050, which the report juxtaposes against the current EU price of $8-$10 per ton.

Costs of CO2 for Various Emission Pathways

One of the key concerns behind the carbon asset risk movement was the hundreds of billions of dollars being spent on exploration to buttress reserves that may never be used. However, even under the “450 Scenario” the world would still consume significant volumes of liquid hydrocarbon fuels. As the chart below shows, if firms stop investing in exploration and production maintenance, supply will fall sharply below demand.

Related Article: Geopolitical Turmoil Takes its Toll on ExxonMobil

Liquids Supply/Demand

By this logic, it is clear why Exxon doesn’t seem to worry about the future value of its assets. It has a secure future demand base, even if the environmental community pulls off a miracle and manages an 80 percent emissions reduction by 2050.

A corporation the size of Exxon, with annual revenues exceeding the gross domestic product of 167 countries, has considered every possible threat to its business model, climate change included. This is likely why the turn-around time on Exxon’s response to the carbon asset risk proposal was so short—they already knew their answer.

By Rory Johnston of Oilprice.com


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • carson on April 03 2014 said:
    I think the firm is purposely downplaying the negative side of the impact!

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News