• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 2 hours americavchina.com (otherwise known as OilPrice).
  • 7 mins Democrats through impeachment process helped Trump go out of China deal conundrum. Now Trump can safely postpone deal till after November 2020 elections
  • 4 hours Forget The Hype, Aramco Shares May be Valued At Zero Next Year
  • 2 days Wallstreet's "acid test" for Democrat Presidential candidate to receive their financial support . . . Support "Carried Interest"
  • 2 days Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 19 hours Natural Gas
  • 10 hours Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, Ukraine Oil & Gas exploration company Burisma, and 2020 U.S. election shenanigans
  • 5 hours POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 3 mins Iraq war and Possible Lies
  • 1 hour READ: New Record Conoco Eagleford Vintage 5 wells, their 5th generation test wells . . . Shale going bust . . . LAUGHABLE
  • 1 day 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019
  • 1 day Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
  • 24 hours Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO
  • 15 hours My interview on PDVSA Petrocaribe and corruption
Alt Text

Canada's Oil Crisis Isn't As Bad As It Seems

Alberta’s oil industry has faced…

Alt Text

China Is Winning The Offshore Oil Game

China’s international presence in the…

Philippa Jones

Philippa Jones

Philippa is a writer for Environmental Finance.Environmental Finance is the leading global publication covering the ever-increasing impact of environmental issues on the lending, insurance, investment…

More Info

Premium Content

European Power Plants Win Reprieve on Emissions

The European Parliament voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to adopt the Industrial Emissions Directive, after agreeing a compromise position that will give power plants extra time to comply with stricter levels for air pollution.

After two-and a-half years of debate, the directive finally updates and merges seven pieces of existing legislation, including the Large Combustion Plant directive and the 1996 Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) directive, which sets the rules for around 52,000 industrial and agricultural installations with a high pollution potential.

The directive will place from 2016 stricter limits on emissions of nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide and dust from installations as diverse as pig farms and oil refineries. Newer power stations face an earlier, 2012 deadline, for the tighter targets, although the measure excludes carbon dioxide emissions as they are already regulated by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).

However, the measures are not as stringent as many MEPs and green lobbyists would have liked, with the final compromise agreeing that EU member states can use “transitional national plans” to allow large combustion plants, including fossil fuel power stations, until July 2020 to meet the rules. Moreover, some older plants may not have to meet the targets as long as they close by the end of 2023 or after operating for a total of 17,500 hours after 2016, whichever comes first.

As a trade-off, the Parliament managed to restrict the scope member states have to deviate from best available technologies (BATs), which are the basis for permitting industrial installations. All businesses covered by the directive must apply BATs to optimise their all-round environmental performance, taking into consideration their emissions to air, soil and water, as well as noise and safety.

Member states will have some leeway to ease the rules but, at the in sistence of MEPs, this will only be allowed if they can prove that the costs would be disproportionate to the environmental benefits. 

German Liberal MEP Holger Krahmer, who guided the legislation through Parliament, said the compromise would, “compared to the current situation…offer more clarity and a better chance of a level playing field across Europe on environmental requirements for industrial installations”.

But he rued the deadline extension given to power plants. “It is a European tragedy that a number of outdated coal-fired power plants will be allowed to pollute for another decade,” said Krahmer. “This is also grossly unfair to member states who took early action to meet the requirements.”

The CBI, the UK’s business organisation, said the extra years were necessary to allow companies enough time to build alternative low-carbon energy sources to replace lost capacity. Neil Bentley, CBI’s director of business environment, said “the alternative would have meant the forced closure of many existing power stations without sufficient time to build replacements. This could have seriously undermined the UK’s energy security.”

Member states now need to rubberstamp Parliament’s decision in the coming months, but this is merely a formality since they have already signalled their support for the compromise position.

By. Philippa Jones

Source: Environmental Finance




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on July 13 2010 said:
    As a Canadian billionaire pointed out a couple of years ago, "we live in the most dishonest period in human history". That isn't even the half of it. As I noted in my energy economics textbooks, where things like emissions trading and electricity pricing are concerned, anything goes. What Mr Krahmer and others seem to forget is that regardless of the progress made in environmental matters in Europe - which isn't and won't be much except for a few countries - the opening of e.g. coal power plants in Asia and elsewhere will result in the continued build-up of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play