• 4 minutes Ten Years of Plunging Solar Prices
  • 7 minutes Hydrogen Capable Natural Gas Turbines
  • 10 minutes World looks on in horror as Trump flails over pandemic despite claims US leads way
  • 13 minutes Large gas belt discovered in China
  • 5 hours Rioting and Protesting
  • 23 mins Trump waves a Bible
  • 9 hours Anti-Lynching Bill
  • 1 min Coronavirus hype biggest political hoax in history
  • 4 hours US and Australia Sign SPR Lease Agreement
  • 12 hours Thugs in Trumpistan
  • 5 hours George Floyd’s History
  • 17 hours Model 3 cheaper to buy than BMW 3 series.
  • 18 hours Sudan Rice claims Russians are behind recent US riots
  • 6 hours Let’s Try This....
  • 17 hours China to Impose Dictatorship on Hong Kong
  • 17 hours We Are Better Than This
  • 18 hours Obamagate Is Not a Conspiracy Theory
  • 19 hours National Guard kills again
Oil And Gas Rig Count Falls For Ninth Straight Week

Oil And Gas Rig Count Falls For Ninth Straight Week

Baker Hughes reported on Friday…

Oil & Gas Still King Despite Renewable Hype

Oil & Gas Still King Despite Renewable Hype

Renewables are often credited for…

Russia Is Quickly Becoming The Most Dominant Force In Energy

Russia Is Quickly Becoming The Most Dominant Force In Energy

Russia is aggressively pursuing global…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Premium Content

Could North America Pull Off Its Own Oil Cartel?

As oil prices turn lower again, many companies in the oil patch face renewed danger of financial distress or even bankruptcy over the next couple of years. The oil market seems more chaotic than ever, and while OPEC meetings still make news, the reality is that the cartel is clearly losing some control over the world’s most important commodity.

With that in mind, it’s time to ask if a new regime makes sense – a North American oil cartel (NAOC). There has been some talk of such a cartel, but no progress of note has been made, and it’s not even clear that U.S. authorities would support such an idea. Strangely, the U.S. has a strong position against cartels and market power in general even though a system of “perfect competition” has many downsides.

In economic terms, perfect competition means a system of numerous small firms competing against one another all with zero pricing power. That’s the ideal of many capitalists, and it is a pretty accurate description of the U.S. oil market currently. Related: Could This Mark The Renaissance Of North Sea Oil And Gas?

In contrast to the views of most Americans, monopoly and oligopoly, which pervade many other sectors of the U.S. economy, can actually have some economic benefits. To be clear, both monopolies and oligopolies are 100 percent consistent with capitalism and are actually a natural byproduct of unfettered capitalism in some industries.

First, perfect competition requires a lot of firms to move in and out of the market with each economic cycle – that means a lot of bankruptcies and a lot of worker turnover. Monopolies and oligopolies tend to be more stable. One major benefit of a NAOC would be the ability to easily alter production to match demand and the output of OPEC and Russia. This would help prevent the wild gyrations in oil prices that hurt businesses and consumers.

A second benefit to monopolies in some cases is that they actually have lower costs than firms do under perfect competition thanks to the benefits of economies of scale. Again, this would be to the benefit of both business and consumers as it would give NAOC greater ability to compete against OPEC and Russia both of which have easier-to-access oil reserves. Related: Low Oil Prices Make This Stock A Good Long-Term Bet

Unfortunately, despite the benefits of a NAOC, it is very unlikely to be formed. First, of course, U.S. law forbids exactly this type of effort to concentrate market power. But setting that issue aside for a minute, the prospect of actually forming a NAOC would be economically unfeasible. OPEC is predicated on having a few large nationally controlled oil companies in each country. That enables effective governing of production by OPEC. The U.S., Canada, and Mexico lack that structure completely. With the widespread availability of unconventional reserves across the continent, there is no real way even for oil majors like Exxon to roll-up the entire industry and consolidate production.

In addition, the major downside of oligopoly and in particular monopoly is a governance one. Big companies tend to rest on their laurels. Having achieved large economic profits, monopolies tend to underinvest in research and innovation, and to start taking on bloated labor and cost structures. Mexico’s oil monopoly is a prime example of this. PEMEX has been a mess for a long time because of exactly these issues. Related: Shell Backs Geothermal Gun Tech

While a NAOC would be great in times of turmoil or distress like the current period, the reality is that once the crisis passed, any such cartel would find its power quickly diminished. Add to that issue the difficulty of getting hundreds of small oil producers spread out across a continent all backing the same strategy, and it’s clear that a NAOC is just not in the cards today.

By Michael McDonald for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Brad on August 06 2015 said:
    Mike, good article.

    Free markets have too many challenges to attempt a 'cartel'.

    There is already far too much bickering between the few OPEC states.

    God forbid, we should try to get hundreds, no thousands of North American free-market oil-n-gas producers to agree on specific policies!

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News