• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 15 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 1 day How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 11 days What fool thought this was a good idea...
  • 1 day Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 9 days A question...
  • 14 days Why does this keep coming up? (The Renewable Energy Land Rush Could Threaten Food Security)
  • 14 days They pay YOU to TAKE Natural Gas
Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Chilcot Report: UK Oil Interests Were Lead Motive For Iraq War

Middle East

The long-awaited report of John Chilcot, a senior UK civil servant, on the Iraqi War and the events that led to it has revealed that the UK energy business had a pretty solid vested interest in the conflict.

Documents revealed as part of the huge, 12-volume report, show that British government officials involved in the events that led up to the war, the war itself and the following restoration period pursued as a main objective the corporate interests of energy giants BP and Shell. This was not, however, mentioned in the 150-page summary of the impressively extensive report: 2.6 million words in all.

Secret meetings between government officials and BP and Shell to discuss how they would proceed once Saddam was been toppled are revealed in the document. Iraq, the minutes of one such a meeting read, is “special for the oil companies” and “BP are desperate to get in there.”

In other words, what Chilcot’s report has revealed, albeit reluctantly and seemingly unwillingly, is that energy, not weapons for mass destruction (non-existent as it turned out) was the main motive for the Iraq invasion and the bloody conflict that ensued.

Energy concerns continued to top the agenda in the aftermath of the war as well. According to Open Democracy, a theme repeatedly appearing in the documents that were analysed by Chilcot and his team was “to transfer Iraq’s oil industry from public ownership to the hands of multinational companies, and to make sure BP and Shell get a large piece of that.” Related: Diminishing Outages Could Exacerbate Oil’s Fall

BP operates the huge Rumaila oilfield in Iraq, while Shell operates the equally giant Majnoon field. From 2010, when BP stepped in as operator, Rumaila produced 2.2 billion barrels of crude to 2015 and at the moment accounts for a third of Iraq’s overall oil output.

Production at the Majnoon field, on the other hand, only started around three years ago, with the firs crude flowing in 2014. Since then, production had reached 210,000 barrels by 29015, but as oil prices began sliding, Shell moved to revise future production targets, as exploitation of the field under those price circumstances became much less lucrative.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

ADVERTISEMENT

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • John Scior on July 07 2016 said:
    Any mention of what was in it for American Oil Companies ??? ie Exxonmobil or Chevron ???
  • Tony Quinn on July 08 2016 said:
    a very one sided viewpoint
  • Philip Branton on July 08 2016 said:
    Where is this article on the front page of the CNBC website..? It takes a "Chilcot Report" to determine that OIL was a motive for war..? Heck, just watch "Egypt's Lost Power" via youtube to get a similar clue. The so called "Arab Spring" was about oil. The "motive" for Boko Haram and the Darfur drama is about....OIL.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News